Available for a limited time only - £10 off a £20 spend at eXpansys! For more details visit this topic!

Please Log In or Register - it's FREE!

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
 Ann: mTimeSync for Smartphone
SlipstreamSoluti...
post Mar 17 2005, 08:53
Post #1


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 13
Joined: 17th March 2005
Member No.: 117,689



New from SlipstreamSolutions.co.uk...

mTimeSync for Smartphone!



mTimeSync is a .NET application to keep your Smartphone clock automatically synchronized with atomic NTP time servers on the Internet.

mTimeSync uses a minimal amount of bandwidth and its rich, intuitive interface allows a user to select from a number of options, including:
  • Configurable settings, including server name, NTP string and NTP port.
  • Automatic polling, including synchronization every N-minutes and N-retries of a failed sync (optional).
  • Primary and Secondary NTP time servers for failover and reliability.
  • Automatically dials if not connected (optional).
  • Automatically starts synchronizing when the application is run (optional).
  • Automatically runs in the background.
  • Supports worldwide time zones and daylight saving times.
All you need on your Smartphone is Microsoft .NET Compact Framework and a connection to the Internet (such as GPRS).

www.SlipstreamSolutions.co.uk


This post has been edited by SlipstreamSolutions: Mar 17 2005, 13:54
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Lee
post Mar 17 2005, 09:55
Post #2


Addict
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 576
Joined: 29th May 2003
From: Sale, UK
Member No.: 7,007

Device(s): MDA Vario III



FYI your website doesn't work in Firefox.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tudor
post Mar 17 2005, 10:04
Post #3


Diehard
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 374
Joined: 20th January 2005
From: Romania
Member No.: 106,056

Device(s): SPV C600



QUOTE(Phil Lee @ Mar 17 2005, 09:59)
FYI your website doesn't work in Firefox.
*

Then get a more powerful browser, like Internet Explorer wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
badlad
post Mar 17 2005, 10:05
Post #4


Regular
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 100
Joined: 1st April 2003
From: York
Member No.: 4,177

Device(s): M500 / XDA IQ



QUOTE(Phil Lee @ Mar 17 2005, 09:59)
FYI your website doesn't work in Firefox.
*

Its does work .... just very badly smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Confucious
post Mar 17 2005, 12:02
Post #5


Peanut Brain
Group Icon

Group: MoDaCo Plus
Posts: 6,409
Joined: 10th September 2004
From: Surrey, England
Member No.: 56,072

Device(s): iPhone 8Gb. Athena, C600



I would have had a look at this but as I use Firefox I can't.

If a company can't even use proper standards for it's website does one have to question the standards used in their software?

wink.gif


--------------------
He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tudor
post Mar 17 2005, 12:09
Post #6


Diehard
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 374
Joined: 20th January 2005
From: Romania
Member No.: 106,056

Device(s): SPV C600



Why do people blame the webmaster for the site not being diplayed properly and not the Firefox browser for not being able to display it? The issue is that Internet Explorer CAN and Firefox CAN NOT display the page, and I don't think it's fair to judge the company by Firefox's ability to display a page.
And... before you question this... I'm not related to this company, nor am I interested in their product - it's just a matter of principle.


This post has been edited by tudor: Mar 17 2005, 12:09
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gcparris
post Mar 17 2005, 12:28
Post #7


Regular
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 53
Joined: 20th August 2003
From: Bishop's Stortford
Member No.: 13,478

Device(s): HTC S710 (VOX) Smartphone



Tudor, not wishing to slate you but you obviously don't really know too much about web page design standards then wink.gif


QUOTE(tudor @ Mar 17 2005, 12:13)
Why do people blame the webmaster for the site not being diplayed properly and not the Firefox browser for not being able to display it? The issue is that Internet Explorer CAN and Firefox CAN NOT display the page, and I don't think it's fair to judge the company by Firefox's ability to display a page.
And... before you question this... I'm not related to this company, nor am I interested in their product - it's just a matter of principle.
*


--------------------
HTC S710 (VOX) + Bluetooth SiRF III GPS + MODACO CamerAware with T-Mobile.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tudor
post Mar 17 2005, 12:34
Post #8


Diehard
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 374
Joined: 20th January 2005
From: Romania
Member No.: 106,056

Device(s): SPV C600



QUOTE(gcparris @ Mar 17 2005, 12:32)
Tudor, not wishing to slate you but you obviously don't really know too much about web page design standards then wink.gif
*

Actually, I do know, but I also appreciate the capability of Internet Explorer to cope even with poorly written pages.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Confucious
post Mar 17 2005, 12:45
Post #9


Peanut Brain
Group Icon

Group: MoDaCo Plus
Posts: 6,409
Joined: 10th September 2004
From: Surrey, England
Member No.: 56,072

Device(s): iPhone 8Gb. Athena, C600



No, it just means that Micro$oft change the rules to suit themselves.

If people want to write their web pages so only IE users can view them then fine. It's there problem, I'm nopt going to use IE just to suit them.. If they don't want me to view their page I wont. If they want their pages to be viewable by most people they shouls use agreed standards.

Fine by me either way. wink.gif


--------------------
He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chucky.egg
post Mar 17 2005, 12:49
Post #10


Did I say that out loud?
Group Icon

Group: News Team
Posts: 4,530
Joined: 20th August 2003
From: Kent, England
Member No.: 13,469

Device(s): Kaiser, Touch



QUOTE(tudor @ Mar 17 2005, 12:38)
Actually, I do know, but I also appreciate the capability of Internet Explorer to cope even with poorly written pages.
*


This is all kind of OT, but...
You say we shouldn't judge the company based on Firefox's ability to display the page, and then say that their page(s) are poorly written. So in effect the judgement of the company is based on their ability to produce a working web page and not on Firefox's ability to display it.

Anyways, mTIMEsync is not as interesting to me as mGALsync...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tudor
post Mar 17 2005, 13:14
Post #11


Diehard
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 374
Joined: 20th January 2005
From: Romania
Member No.: 106,056

Device(s): SPV C600



OK guys, here are my APOLOGIES :oops:
I've just had a brief look before on their home page's source code and it all seemed clean to me, except for some redundant tags, that's why I've defended them. The idea that Firefox would not be able to display it made me question the quality of the browser.
However, I've just installed Firefox now to check and the home page renders fine, but there are other pages that don't show up ok, and IT IS poor design. I think it's due to FrontPage and the WYSIWYG design.
Still, I don't think we should judge the application by the look of the web page.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Confucious
post Mar 17 2005, 13:24
Post #12


Peanut Brain
Group Icon

Group: MoDaCo Plus
Posts: 6,409
Joined: 10th September 2004
From: Surrey, England
Member No.: 56,072

Device(s): iPhone 8Gb. Athena, C600



Tudor - when I suggested that we should it WAS tongue in cheek. Never take anything I say to seriously - I don't wink.gif


--------------------
He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Belgarath Krall
post Mar 18 2005, 13:58
Post #13


Regular
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 74
Joined: 15th December 2003
From: Bournemouth
Member No.: 24,728

Device(s): Tytn II



so i can update my phone's clock (which doesn't lose more than a few minutes over a few months i imagine) over the air with a pay-for gprs connection...or use activesync for free like pretty much every smartphone user here

...sorry to be cynical, or have i missed the point?


--------------------
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the Universe is winning."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SlipstreamSoluti...
post Mar 21 2005, 14:53
Post #14


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 13
Joined: 17th March 2005
Member No.: 117,689



Hi guys, apologies for the incompatibility problems with FireFox. :oops:

I have soundly beaten my web designer (which he actually seemed to quite enjoy) and the pages are now displaying correctly.

Joanne
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunoke
post Mar 21 2005, 15:36
Post #15


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 16
Joined: 16th March 2005
Member No.: 117,495

Device(s): QTEK 8500



The problem is not the incompatibility with firefox, but not following a html standard. When I validate your web page it is still full of errors. If you fix those the page and the page does comply, for example to the html 4.01 transitional standard, it can be correctly interpreted by a browser that complies with that standard (most browsers do).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SlipstreamSoluti...
post Mar 21 2005, 21:47
Post #16


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 13
Joined: 17th March 2005
Member No.: 117,689



Hi sunoke, cheers for the tip.

I've passed it along with a few comments... :evil: ...and looks like they're getting busy.

Jo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

Similar Topics

  Topic Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No new Topic has attachmentsFinally... the Microsoft utility for configuring GPSID on Smartphone
180 Paul (MVP) 80,641 Today, 15:24
Last post by: dutchphoto
No new Topic has attachmentsgames for the Omnia i900.
474 loquillo 256,685 Today, 18:58
Last post by: NeilZA
No new Topic has attachments(Updated 9/12/08)New graphic Interface for OMNIA
We are working for you....
385 Hellbender 103,461 Today, 18:40
Last post by: sepp_a_u
No New Posts Topic has attachmentsToken2Shell SSH for Windows Mobile - free RC testing!
7 Paul (MVP) 380 Today, 13:56
Last post by: UndeadDevil
No New Posts Average time for a GPS fix??
8 Master_Axe 274 Today, 19:14
Last post by: dirty83sanchez
No New Posts Is there a "hard-spl" for the Omnia
0 Pete2 41 Today, 16:08
Last post by: Pete2

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


RSS hit counter Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2009 - 19:16

Please visit our 'Plus Partners' - these companies support MoDaCo through 'MoDaCo Plus' - Click Here for more details!

ActiveKitten | Aiko Solutions | Ateksoft | Binaryfish | Conduits | DeveloperOne | eSoft Interactive | FTouchSL | Inesoft | Lingvosoft |

monocube | Mykesoft | OmegaOne | Omnisoft | Opera Software | Resco | SBSH | Slipstream Solutions | SPB Software House |

Splashdata | Sprite Software | Syncdata | Teksoft | VITO | WalkingHotSpot | WebIS | z4soft

Would your company like to become a 'Plus Partner'? Click Here to contact us!