Available for a limited time only - £10 off a £20 spend at eXpansys! For more details visit this topic!

Please Log In or Register - it's FREE!

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
 Remote Code Execution on Windows Mobile - '0wnd by an MMS'
Paul (MVP)
post Aug 9 2006, 16:41
Post #1


The Main Man
Group Icon

Group: Admin Team
Posts: 20,495
Joined: 6th November 2002
From: Norwich, UK
Member No.: 1

Device(s): HTC Advantage



[teaser]Think that mobile phone viruses are going to be limited to the Symbian world, and that you are safe using a Windows Mobile device?

Well, that's not the case, according to this article over at Symantec.

QUOTE(Symantec)
...at DefCon this past weekend, Collin Mulliner demonstrated a remote code execution flaw via MMS on Windows CE.

Collin's slides show how he used a malformed MMS message to achieve arbitrary code execution on a device, simply by having a user view the message. This is obviously of great concern; Windows Mobile devices are becoming more and more prevalent and the substantial challenges with patching continue to exist.

At the end of 2005, the Symantec Advanced Threat Research team performed a detailed attack surface analysis of Windows CE 5. We took a very broad and a very deep look as to how attacks could target Windows CE (and thus Windows Mobile) devices both from a remote perspective, as well as a local privilege escalation perspective (CE 5 includes the concept of trusted versus un-trusted applications). This research included documenting all of the remote attack vectors that could potentially exist. During the course of the research, as you would expect, we found a number of remote code execution flaws that could be leveraged in a malicious fashion. While we won't be disclosing the specific flaws just yet, what we will discuss is the overall security architecture of CE5, the types of vulnerabilities we discovered, how these impact mobile devices, and what, if anything, people can do to protect themselves....
[/teaser]
Concerning words indeed, and I thoroughtly recommend checking out Collin Mulliner's PDF slide deck here if you want to learn more about this particular vulnerability, or to read Collin's research into Windows Mobile Phone devices' attack surface in general.

Remember people, don't have nightmares wink.gif

P (via msmobiles)



--------------------
Paul O'Brien - Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices, MoDaCo.network Founder. Check out my Blog!

£10 off a £20 spend at eXpansys - click for details
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheAfroman
post Aug 9 2006, 21:18
Post #2


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 13
Joined: 27th March 2006
Member No.: 179,919

Device(s): T-Mobile SDA



I was at this talk in Vegas this past weekend.. great talk..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
muff
post Aug 10 2006, 09:59
Post #3


Addict
Group Icon

Group: MoDaCo Plus
Posts: 938
Joined: 19th January 2003
Member No.: 2,098



serious amount of testing went into finding these exploits - very nice write up
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samsonite
post Aug 11 2006, 13:58
Post #4


Addict
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 650
Joined: 11th July 2004
Member No.: 49,096

Device(s): QtekS100, E650, Touch Dual



scanning thru the PDF, it would appear to me that the onus is in the networks to resolve this.

Without the speaker, the notes are only giving half the story but i could pick up that the sanitizing of the messages is achieved at the infrastructure level, not the device. The device seems unable to differentiate between a good and bad message...

With this in mind, would an anti-virus package in the conventional context actually offer any protection? I dont think it would...

considering the actual number if MMS's sent to Windows Mobile units -and as the PDF states, this is all based in the previous OS kernal, not WM5 - is it a real worry? i think i shall still run the gauntlet and stay unprotected...

interesting/comforting to know that there is a real effort in this area though. Both in the 'attacking' and 'defence from' areas.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swampie
post Aug 11 2006, 14:06
Post #5


Diehard
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 384
Joined: 31st March 2005
From: Surrey, UK
Member No.: 120,987

Device(s): MDA Vario III + MDA Vario



QUOTE(Samsonite @ Aug 11 2006, 14:58) *
scanning thru the PDF, it would appear to me that the onus is in the networks to resolve this.


I thought I read that MS and the MMS software company had provided a fix, but it was up to the networks to provide new ROMs for the devices... which on a Windows Mobile 2003 device is unlikely now.

There was no mention whether the bug was also in WM5. Seeing as the MMS is still a separate app I believe, it's possible. If so, lets hope they (and then the networks) release an update.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDAHazzard
post Aug 13 2006, 11:15
Post #6


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 7
Joined: 8th October 2004
Member No.: 59,711



Symantec is not a real frontline player in the mobile AV market. I'd rather believe F-Secure, when it comes to Mobile AV, as they have developped much earlier AND own AV software for both PDA's and smartphones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pookiecheeks
post Aug 13 2006, 14:59
Post #7


Regular
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 90
Joined: 16th February 2006
Member No.: 172,939

Device(s): orange spv m2000, se k800i



hello all,
so when last year i forked out £50+ for airscanner's 'mobile security suite' and people laughed at me saying i wasted my money and that the software would never be needed, does this mean i'm covered for such nastiness and that its now my turn to laugh ?


pooks


ps. or does this mean that once again i need to wipe the egg off my face ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samsonite
post Aug 13 2006, 16:29
Post #8


Addict
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 650
Joined: 11th July 2004
Member No.: 49,096

Device(s): QtekS100, E650, Touch Dual



QUOTE(pookiecheeks @ Aug 13 2006, 15:59) *
hello all,
so when last year i forked out £50+ for airscanner's 'mobile security suite' and people laughed at me saying i wasted my money and that the software would never be needed, does this mean i'm covered for such nastiness and that its now my turn to laugh ?
pooks
ps. or does this mean that once again i need to wipe the egg off my face ?

depends if your protection can prevent 1000 MMS's being delivered to your phone....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fraser
post Aug 30 2006, 12:46
Post #9


Hardcore
Group Icon

Group: Posters
Posts: 1,810
Joined: 17th February 2003
From: Scotland
Member No.: 2,867

Device(s): M2000



QUOTE(Samsonite @ Aug 11 2006, 14:58) *
With this in mind, would an anti-virus package in the conventional context actually offer any protection? I dont think it would...

It would not help at all. A remote exploit is not a virus, it's simply a way of executing code. Now, the code the attacker may execute might install a virus. If the virus scanner was familiar with that virus (or how it hooks into the OS boot proceedure), then it might be able to detect it. Maybe.

However, there aren't any viruses for the windows mobiles platform yet, so there is nothing to look for. It's nice to see Symantec working hard to change that...ought to be good for their sales. mad.gif

Here's what the code probably looks like in all the existing scanners. Remember, there's nothing for them to look for at the moment.

CODE
while(true) {
    doNothing();
    sleepAWhile();
}


Firewalls on the other hand are a different matter, but the last time I scanned my phone nothing showed up. No running services = no exploits. Microsoft learned that one the hard way years ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

Similar Topics

  Topic Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No new Topic has attachmentsPaul's complete guide to installing OSX Leopard on your MSI Wind / Advent 4211
Video uploading now...
546 Paul (MVP) 205,503 Today, 18:23
Last post by: elalitte
No new Pinned: Topic has attachmentsROM download links, naming scheme + 'Incorrect Software Version' fix
171 Paul (MVP) 76,759 Today, 18:01
Last post by: PhilipE
No new Pinned: Topic has attachmentsPaul's must have FREE i900 Omnia software
62 Paul (MVP) 30,187 Today, 18:18
Last post by: GTDave
No New Posts T-Mobile MDA Vario IV release date?
12 vii_voo 1,004 Today, 16:33
Last post by: acre
No new How to browse Files on your PC using wifi
18 BazzaE 610 Today, 18:20
Last post by: L.P
No new Topic has attachmentsComplete install guide for Manila (TouchFlo 2D) on i900
HTC Standard Skin - All files incl
67 robf80 4,912 Today, 18:02
Last post by: sector

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


RSS hit counter Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th October 2008 - 19:20


Please visit our 'Plus Partners' - these companies support MoDaCo through 'MoDaCo Plus' - Click Here for more details!

VITO Technology | Slipstream Solutions | Aiko Solutions | PDAMill | Inesoft | SBSH | LingvoSoft | Ruttensoft | Astraware | MadBeetle | Sprite Software

Opera | Westtek | TetraEdge | Z4Soft | KBM Systems | Conduits | Mini Lyrics Magic | Proporta | Semsons | SyncData | Active Kitten | Binaryfish | Textr

SPB Software House | Omega One | OmniSoft | Resco | eSoft Interactive | TenGo | ATEKsoft | imei-check | GpsGate | SplashData | DeveloperOne | monocube

WebIS, home of Pocket Informant, FlexMail and Note2Self

Would your company like to become a 'Plus Partner'? Click Here to contact us!