Guest Totyasrác Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 If I'm presently on tre kernel (FLB 1.2) do I have to go to december update via timemachine first, and then update, or can just update? I guess just update - if the firmware you're using is TMo HUN 2.1 (that can be directly upgraded). Not sure about Tre though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest brack Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 I guess just update - if the firmware you're using is TMo HUN 2.1 (that can be directly upgraded). Not sure about Tre though. I had official tre before flb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Got a reply to my tweet asking for the source: OH MA GAWD!!! YES!!! (Link please?) Woohoooo, first Swap and a truckload of customizations to FLB and than Froyo :) A good day indeed. Why didn't we get swap and stuff on 1.5, even though we had the source? And wouldn't Froyo still be hard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david_dawkins Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 (edited) OH MA GAWD!!! YES!!! (Link please?) Once they've sent it to me (well, tweeted the link), you can fill yer boots Edited August 6, 2010 by david_dawkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Once they've sent it to me (well, tweeted the link), you can fill yer boots I meant to the tweet, I wish to watch that tweet forever!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest igor_anta Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Why didn't we get swap and stuff on 1.5, even though we had the source? And wouldn't Froyo still be hard? As far as I know we had Swap support for 1.5, but it conflicted with apps2sd. Now that shouldn't be a problem :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Why didn't we get swap and stuff on 1.5, even though we had the source? Ask Paul :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 As far as I know we had Swap support for 1.5, but it conflicted with apps2sd. Now that shouldn't be a problem :) well it's a problem for me as I know nothing about compiling kernels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david_dawkins Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 I meant to the tweet, I wish to watch that tweet forever!! Oh! It was a private message, can't see how to link it. Attached screenshot for you. .. and Paul's alive (in response to tweet about the release): PaulOBrien @DaveDawkins Better late than never! Will check it out first thing Monday now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Ask Paul :) Paul, why didn't we have swap in 1.5 (that worked with A2SD)? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david_dawkins Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 well it's a problem for me as I know nothing about compiling kernels. We (mainly Mr Bear) put together a guide on how to do that, see Bear's sig for link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest igor_anta Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 well it's a problem for me as I know nothing about compiling kernels. Suppose there are people that know. Maybe Paul will fly over to give us Swap and return to his Galaxy S after that :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Oh! It was a private message, can't see how to link it. Attached screenshot for you. .. and Paul's alive (in response to tweet about the release): OH MA GAWD - I thought he died... And hopefully we get it today or tomorrow, I hate the wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azurren Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Suppose there are people that know. Maybe Paul will fly over to give us Swap and return to his Galaxy S after that :D If he does he won't get away with a hug :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Sooooooooooooooooo anybody want this ROM rooted, superuser installed and a2sd enabled? Uploading it now :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david_dawkins Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 (edited) OH MA GAWD - I thought he died... And hopefully we get it today or tomorrow, I hate the wait. Keep your expectations low - the released 2.6.27 source didn't build a working kernel, the same may happen this time. What's likely is that we can push the Egengucker/Bobo 2.2 kernel project forward (which is actually a .32 kernel, but TomG's work shows that 2.2 will run on .29). Sorry to piss on your fireworks... Edit: Correct .31 to .32, thanks Dan Edited August 6, 2010 by david_dawkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Sooooooooooooooooo anybody want this ROM rooted, superuser installed and a2sd enabled? Uploading it now :) Why? FLB is way better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanWilson Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Keep your expectations low - the released 2.6.27 source didn't build a working kernel, the same may happen this time. What's likely is that we can push the Egengucker/Bobo 2.2 kernel project forward (which is actually a .31 kernel, but TomG's work shows that 2.2 will run on .29). Sorry to piss on your fireworks... .32 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Why? FLB is way better. Believe it or not there are some strange people that prefer the stock rom :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Epic-Emodude Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Sooooooooooooooooo anybody want this ROM rooted, superuser installed and a2sd enabled? Uploading it now :) Can you create an FLB-MOD release based on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest robot1000 Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 I guess just update - if the firmware you're using is TMo HUN 2.1 (that can be directly upgraded). Not sure about Tre though. It can also be updated from TRE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 (edited) Can you create an FLB-MOD release based on it? I will base future versions on the UK rom. I tell you what though this ROM is way better than the Hungarian ROM, and that's with all the T-Mobile crap. It feels much smoother and a lot more responsive. Actually feels like FLB-Mod with the t-mobile theming and launcher... hmm :) Edited August 6, 2010 by flibblesan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 Keep your expectations low - the released 2.6.27 source didn't build a working kernel, the same may happen this time. What's likely is that we can push the Egengucker/Bobo 2.2 kernel project forward (which is actually a .32 kernel, but TomG's work shows that 2.2 will run on .29). Sorry to piss on your fireworks... Edit: Correct .31 to .32, thanks Dan The 1.5 kernel source certainly did work as Paul added compcache to the kernel along with some other tweaks (which I can't quite remember at the moment). What didn't work for us was compiling the Pulse Mini .29 code for the Pulse. It was missing some bits. Hopefully when we do get the .29 code for the Pulse we can at least build a working kernel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest giryan Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 I will base future versions on the UK rom. I tell you what though this ROM is way better than the Hungarian ROM, and that's with all the T-Mobile crap. It feels much smoother and a lot more responsive. Actually feels like FLB-Mod with the t-mobile theming and launcher... hmm :D Yeah, a friend's just updated to it(I'm sticking with FLB for the moment :) ), looks really good in comparison to the Hungarian one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david_dawkins Posted August 6, 2010 Report Share Posted August 6, 2010 The 1.5 kernel source certainly did work as Paul added compcache to the kernel along with some other tweaks (which I can't quite remember at the moment). What didn't work for us was compiling the Pulse Mini .29 code for the Pulse. It was missing some bits. Hopefully when we do get the .29 code for the Pulse we can at least build a working kernel. Well, I'm glad to now be in a position where I can stop propagating that particular piece of misinformation. :) That is AWESOME "news". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now