• Announcements

    • Reminder - MoDaCo position on illegal content   07/30/15

      ILLEGAL CONTENT I'd like to just reaffirm MoDaCo's position regarding piracy and illegal content in the light of some recent questions / postings. Posts will be censored by myself or my moderation team if the contain or link to: Illegal / pirated / cracked software or sites that host such softwareNintendo emulators / ROMs or sites hosting them (in light of Nintendo's legal stance)CUSTOM ROMS You may discuss and post links to custom device ROMs on MoDaCo, provided the following rules are adhered to: ROMs must not contain any illegal 3rd party software (this includes trial versions included without permission)ROMs must give full credit to the original authorISSUES If you have any issues with this policy, please contact PaulOBrien directly via PM.
    • Reminder: Selling items on the forum directly is not allowed   07/30/15

      Please note that selling items on the forum directly is not allowed by the forum rules. There is a forum for eBay auctions whereby you can list the items on eBay and link to them there. This is the ONLY forum for this type of activity. You may also advertise links to the eBay forum in your signature. Please note that selling directly in contravention of these rules will result in a warning / suspension / ban.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

San Francisco vs San Francisco II any improvements??

6 posts in this topic

Posted

As long time ZTE Racer owner (Android 2.1) I want to update to a phone with Android 2.3 and a bigger higher resolution captivate touch screen.

So I noticed the San Francisco II today in the Argos catalogue being sold for roughly the same price as the older original San Francisco.

From what I can tell the San Francisco II has a 5mpix camera, 800MHz Processor (ARMv6??) and Android 2.3 Gingerbread which incidentally sounds pretty much like the specs for the oversized overpriced Orange Monty Carlo.

I also read additional comments on a review site that the Processor was under powered when compared to other handsets.

Now I'm not bothered about processing power I was happy to play Angry Birds on my Racer so I doubt this would be much of a problem on the San Francisco II.

However I was wondering how does this phone perform for making voice calls i.e. good quality loud speaker, GPS navigation, Wifi connectivity / stability and poor quality camera.

Also how easy is this to unlock is there an NCK code method like the Racer or do I need to flash my handset??

Richard S.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I think you'd appreciate the san fransisco 2 just for the capacitive touchscreen,better camera and for an unlock code you'd need to wait the compulsory 3 months to be issued an unlock code but theres threads on here to guide you to unlock via fastboot or TPT right away which are so easy.Also the processor does run at 800mhz which is fine for angry birds etc and it will be soon be overclockable. I have the t mobile vivacity which after the £10 compulsory top up of the handsets is £10 cheaper with the same inner parts as the san fransisco, the only difference is it has a different shell or case. hope this helps.

As long time ZTE Racer owner (Android 2.1) I want to update to a phone with Android 2.3 and a bigger higher resolution captivate touch screen.

So I noticed the San Francisco II today in the Argos catalogue being sold for roughly the same price as the older original San Francisco.

From what I can tell the San Francisco II has a 5mpix camera, 800MHz Processor (ARMv6??) and Android 2.3 Gingerbread which incidentally sounds pretty much like the specs for the oversized overpriced Orange Monty Carlo.

I also read additional comments on a review site that the Processor was under powered when compared to other handsets.

Now I'm not bothered about processing power I was happy to play Angry Birds on my Racer so I doubt this would be much of a problem on the San Francisco II.

However I was wondering how does this phone perform for making voice calls i.e. good quality loud speaker, GPS navigation, Wifi connectivity / stability and poor quality camera.

Also how easy is this to unlock is there an NCK code method like the Racer or do I need to flash my handset??

Richard S.

Edited by ROMZERO
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The Vivacity looks a nice phone I especially like the fact there are no navigation push buttons and the camera doesn't stick out like a sore thumb.

I did read somewhere the battery capacity is smaller than the SF2 and suffers from touch lag depending on the controller provided i.e. Amtel or Synaptics.

Is this lag a real problem or are some people just too picky because they type too fast??

Personally I'm not really bothered so long as the screen is accurate to my finger touch but I would like to know what the fuss is about.

Richard S.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Yeah it does look nice very much like an iphone 4 and the fact that it only has soft buttons is cool because they dont make a creeky noise like the sf2. I dont know about the battery being smaller but i find it fine for every day use and i play a lot of music through it. I charge it once a day so its full battery again tho. I have the inferior amtel touchscreen but ive not had a problem with it.kinda panicked at first finding out it wasnt a synaptics but its been fine with stock rom and after i flashed flibbles r2a rom and the vivacity stock kernel also provided by flibble kindly. Maybe their picky i wouldnt like to judge anyone on that. the choice is yours.im quite chuffed i saved a tenner and i was able to just walk into the t mobile store and purchase one unlike the sf2 they kept selling out because orange stores only get one at a time lol

The Vivacity looks a nice phone I especially like the fact there are no navigation push buttons and the camera doesn't stick out like a sore thumb.

I did read somewhere the battery capacity is smaller than the SF2 and suffers from touch lag depending on the controller provided i.e. Amtel or Synaptics.

Is this lag a real problem or are some people just too picky because they type too fast??

Personally I'm not really bothered so long as the screen is accurate to my finger touch but I would like to know what the fuss is about.

Richard S.

Edited by ROMZERO
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Battery is identical. I don't have a problem with the inferior Amtel screen either. Works very smooth and accuracy is spot on. Responsiveness is better but still not up with the expensive phones, which is to be expected.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

+1

Battery is identical. I don't have a problem with the inferior Amtel screen either. Works very smooth and accuracy is spot on. Responsiveness is better but still not up with the expensive phones, which is to be expected.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2015. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.