Patrick73

G300 Benchmark scores updated..

22 posts in this topic

post-808402-0-48668100-1334507551_thumb.post-808402-0-22929700-1334498139_thumb.post-808402-0-94108100-1334498174_thumb.

I have tested a few games on it that i have got

GTA 3 works very well on it so far.

Minecraft is smooth too.

I have done neocore and Quadrant standard test and both good for the spec.

Edited by Patrick73
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good scores. The Cortex A5 is a fantastic chip and hopefully these results will please people who think the phone won't be much better than the Monte Carlo/Skate :lol:

2072 is pretty nice in Quadrant. Could somebody please run antutu and Linpack and provide those results please?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deary me, that is a fair jump from the Blade. I know people say Quadrant scores don't mean much, but there must be something meaningful when it's more than double. :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my highest blade score on antutu. was around 1950 on stock sd card at 729 MHz but most Roms are around 1600-1700 so will be interesting to see comparisons

Edited by Davidoff59
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my highest score on antutu. was around 1950 on stock sd card at 729 MHz but most Roms are around 1600-1700 so will be interesting to see comparisons

Not bad. I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S. If it's true then that's impressive.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry. those scores were on blade.. Opera playing up so could not edit

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

Was that a stagefright thing...

like was it not broken on Froyo....

giving double scores cos when enabled.....

lotta really good Blades out there, I seem to remember!!!1

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah its very good for the price shame about the rear speaker ( i might go on about that a bit ).

And the Shite UI.

I was looking at getting the Nokia 710 for £129 plus top up, but I did like the feel and look of this one. But as I have just under 100 app's for Android, It was better for me to get this lol.

Thinking of doing a youtube video review, but my voice is a bit rough at the min.

Its a twat to open fully up too. and not much inside :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was that a stagefright thing...

like was it not broken on Froyo....

giving double scores cos when enabled.....

lotta really good Blades out there, I seem to remember!!!1

Yes it was but they fixed that in the latest versions of Quadrant.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

2985 score for antutu.

Although that does not show up the poor scrolling of web pages which is terrible for some reason , not a patch on the monte carlo , think it must be a software issue.

Edited by putbinoot
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul O'Brien has run AnTuTu! Score of 2882

post-697226-0-14844800-1334505374_thumb.

And Quadrant score is 2105

post-697226-0-95061900-1334505452_thumb.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad. I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S. If it's true then that's impressive.

If it helps here is a Quadrant of a Galaxy S 1270, I have just got the new Galaxy S Media 3.6, and this hammers the Galaxy S, hope these help in your comparisons

post-407498-0-38265500-1334515538_thumb.

post-407498-0-14264000-1334515639_thumb.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, bugger. I bought a skate, and this is lovely

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S.

So you're saying this is better than the galaxy s? Z

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you're saying this is better than the galaxy s? Z

Well it's not as easy as that. Obviously the Galaxy S build quality is far higher and it has a much nicer screen. The benchmark scores just show that the G300 is a pretty decent device and should have some room for improvement.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The benchmark scores just show that the G300 is a pretty decent device and should have some room for improvement.

Yup that's what I meant by better tongue.gif. Of course the Galaxy S' build quality would be better. Always find myself wanting to knick the lover's phone

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure the Galaxy S build quality is really better than the G300...

P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah its very good for the price shame about the rear speaker ( i might go on about that a bit ).

And the Shite UI.

I was looking at getting the Nokia 710 for £129 plus top up, but I did like the feel and look of this one. But as I have just under 100 app's for Android, It was better for me to get this lol.

Thinking of doing a youtube video review, but my voice is a bit rough at the min.

Its a twat to open fully up too. and not much inside smile.gif

the speaker is a software problem. an app called spirit will enable the fm transmitter without hedphones enabled to increase sound.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

G300, my Quadrant scores, no overclocking:

On GB I had 1950-2100

ICS official 1500

CM9 1500

Infusion B07 1700

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The highest score I have ever got is 4651 on Antutu (CM9 R3). That's with 1.2 ghz and ondemand settings.

post-969101-13544574671068_thumb.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2016. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.