Sign in to follow this  
hajj_3

Firefox 19 Beta now works on 600mhz armv6 such as ZTE blade :)

Recommended Posts

hajj_3    34

Hi guys, if you go to play store you can now download firefox 19 beta which works on our zte blade phones :)

Previously, the browser required an 800MHz ARMv6 processor or faster, but Mozilla lowered the requirement to 600MHz, along with 512MB of memory, and HVGA (480x320 pixels) screen resolution.

The browser is 21.37mb btw.

more info: http://news.cnet.com...-android-reach/

Firefox 20 will have a memory requirement of just 384MB, a customizable homepage, HTML5 context menus support and private browsing.

Edited by hajj_3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shezar    45

Wow, the initial armv6 nightlies were "a bit" faster...

Anyways, nice to see firefox finally on my phone, I'll try using it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vNa5h    105

Whats the big deal man..

imo the stock jb browser is better than firefox...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hajj_3    34

Whats the big deal man..

imo the stock jb browser is better than firefox...

Stock browser on android 2.3.7 cynogenmod gets 200 on html5test.com, firefox 19 beta scores 392.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sulthekk    155

Whoah when did this thing became so much slower?

I'm wondering how do they intend to put firefox os on low-end phones if it stays that way...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hajj_3    34

Whoah when did this thing became so much slower?

I'm wondering how do they intend to put firefox os on low-end phones if it stays that way...

I think the requirements of firefox os is an 800mhz cpu as the minimum allowed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
targetbsp    467

Last time I tried firefox it was horrifically sluggish and worked fine. Has this changed? A spec change is meaningless if its still slow.

And I'm not talking about benchmarks but how it actually is to use.

Frankly the last time I used the desktop version it had pretty much the same problems. It could ace a webpage 0.01 seconds faster than its competitors but spent several seconds longer loading itself up which kinda defeated the point. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hajj_3    34

Last time I tried firefox it was horrifically sluggish and worked fine. Has this changed? A spec change is meaningless if its still slow.

And I'm not talking about benchmarks but how it actually is to use.

Frankly the last time I used the desktop version it had pretty much the same problems. It could ace a webpage 0.01 seconds faster than its competitors but spent several seconds longer loading itself up which kinda defeated the point. :D

The desktop version is actually pretty quick now in v18 as it has a new javascript engine. The phone version is fairly slow, but so is android's and opera's. I'd rather have a slower browser that could render modern html5 webpages properly than a faster old browser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
targetbsp    467

Does anyone know if FF can auto flow text to width of screen? If FF can't any alternatives? Thanks

Angel browser is the best I've found at that. Which is why I use it. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sulthekk    155

Does anyone know if FF can auto flow text to width of screen? If FF can't any alternatives? Thanks

It can't by default, but there is an addon for it.

FF has a nice plugin architecture... Even though I'm not sure it's good for phones as it is. I mean, I installed an addon and there were no permissions shown to be accepted, which I guess means that every addon can use the rights of the browser, so a malicious addon, once installed can easily do anything with ff's current permissions! :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mitchde    13

I think the new FF beta can run faster (as standard browser) if the hw environment is much better, like RAM = 1 GB.

Running on low end smartfones with less RAM ONLY some js benches are better but in real life (browsing real sites) needs to much ressorces (RAM) for our blade. benefit of fast (but RAm eating) FF goes into other site = slower or has some short hangings.

Edited by mitchde

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
emotty    14

lol just read permissions on this thing its much to cheeky for me .. went in dustbin :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2016. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.