• Announcements

    • Reminder - MoDaCo position on illegal content   07/30/15

      ILLEGAL CONTENT I'd like to just reaffirm MoDaCo's position regarding piracy and illegal content in the light of some recent questions / postings. Posts will be censored by myself or my moderation team if the contain or link to: Illegal / pirated / cracked software or sites that host such softwareNintendo emulators / ROMs or sites hosting them (in light of Nintendo's legal stance)CUSTOM ROMS You may discuss and post links to custom device ROMs on MoDaCo, provided the following rules are adhered to: ROMs must not contain any illegal 3rd party software (this includes trial versions included without permission)ROMs must give full credit to the original authorISSUES If you have any issues with this policy, please contact PaulOBrien directly via PM.
    • Reminder: Selling items on the forum directly is not allowed   07/30/15

      Please note that selling items on the forum directly is not allowed by the forum rules. There is a forum for eBay auctions whereby you can list the items on eBay and link to them there. This is the ONLY forum for this type of activity. You may also advertise links to the eBay forum in your signature. Please note that selling directly in contravention of these rules will result in a warning / suspension / ban.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Well check this out developers

43 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

Deleted

Edited by nikufellow
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't understand LG. They are upgrading Gingerbread branch despite of supporting us or upgrading to ICS at least...

Ram is the biggest issue - their proprietary optimus crap ui + ics won't fit smoothly in mere 301 mb of dram nor would they ditch their launcher and bloats to give us upgrades, in short - we are on our own. Am happy that at least cm nightlies are available for us and guys like you, stan, gellamar and hectate are trying to make things better (sorry if I missed some one)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it will be easy for us if they release v3 kernel source.. i know it won't happen

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

http://pastebin.com/nYNph9YZ

Where I'am so far, current bug is with LGE TEST MODE asking what board is this, so wont build so far. but it looks like a complete source for the E430

lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:28:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME>
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c: In function 'CheckHWRev':
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:173: error: implicit declaration of function 'lge_get_board_revno'
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c: In function 'LGF_TestModeAccelCal':
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: 'lge_pcb_rev' undeclared (first use in this function)
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: for each function it appears in.)
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: expected ';' before 'hw_version'
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2063: error: 'hw_version' undeclared (first use in this function)
lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2070: error: 'LGE_REV_10' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[2]: *** [lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[/code]

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Where is included lg_diag_testmode.h? Do you know the functionality of this functions? Maybe we could remove related files.

Edited by crazybyte
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Where is included lg_diag_testmode.h? Do you know the functionality of this functions? Maybe we could remove related files.

currently comparing lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c from the e430 sources to the e400 sources...

of course we dont actually need it as CM does without

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

http://pastebin.com/nYNph9YZ

Where I'am so far, current bug is with LGE TEST MODE asking what board is this, so wont build so far. but it looks like a complete source for the E430

Seems like you should set CONFIG_LGE_BOARD_HEADER_FILE in defconfig.

Edited by StanTRC
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Seems like you should set CONFIG_LGE_BOARD_HEADER_FILE in defconfig.

agreed,

currently looking at:

git clone https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm -b android-msm-mako-3.4-jb-mr1
and
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-p700.git

as rmcc has recently added e610 (L5) support to the p700 (L7) kernel

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I've built CM 10.1 and tried to boot it with this kernel but I haven't had any luck so far. Tried different command line parameters for kernel, rebuilding ramdisk, messing with the kernel but still can't boot. Probably the boards differ too much. I don't have jtag or UART board to see why it doesn't boot.

as rmcc has recently added e610 (L5) support to the p700 (L7) kernel

He just merged e610 source provided by lg with p700 source also provided by lg.

I don't understand LG. They are upgrading Gingerbread branch despite of supporting us or upgrading to ICS at least...

It's simple, really. At the time of the release of L3, the only difference between L5, L7 and L3 was that L5 and L7 had more ram and a bigger screen at a much higher price. To justify the price difference, L3 has to have an "old" Android version while L5 and L7 has to have a "newer" Android version.

Now they release L3 II and the only difference with L3 is that L3 II has more ram. So to show potential buyers that L3 II is "better" and they have to upgrade, LG overclocked the kernel to 1000Mhz and release L3 II with Gingerbread.

Edited by DeathArrow
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We have a booting cm 10.1 with kernel 3.4 now. Needs a hell lot of bug fixing though !

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We have a booting cm 10.1 with kernel 3.4 now. Needs a hell lot of bug fixing though !

I can bug fix till the cows come home, where?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That's CM10 not CM10.1.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

but he hasnt pushed the sources to git yet :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

but he hasnt pushed the sources to git yet :(

here's the config used for the boot.img for the cm10 build

http://pastebin.com/CSukbMUK

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

here's the config used for the boot.img for the cm10 build

http://pastebin.com/CSukbMUK

going to see if it builds from the e430 source

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

well even if it doesnt build atleast we'll know whether any additional changes were made ;)

Edited by nikufellow
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

well even if it doesnt build atleast we'll know whether any additional changes were made ;)

it builds.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2015. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.