• Announcements

    • Reminder - MoDaCo position on illegal content   07/30/15

      ILLEGAL CONTENT I'd like to just reaffirm MoDaCo's position regarding piracy and illegal content in the light of some recent questions / postings. Posts will be censored by myself or my moderation team if the contain or link to: Illegal / pirated / cracked software or sites that host such softwareNintendo emulators / ROMs or sites hosting them (in light of Nintendo's legal stance)CUSTOM ROMS You may discuss and post links to custom device ROMs on MoDaCo, provided the following rules are adhered to: ROMs must not contain any illegal 3rd party software (this includes trial versions included without permission)ROMs must give full credit to the original authorISSUES If you have any issues with this policy, please contact PaulOBrien directly via PM.
    • Reminder: Selling items on the forum directly is not allowed   07/30/15

      Please note that selling items on the forum directly is not allowed by the forum rules. There is a forum for eBay auctions whereby you can list the items on eBay and link to them there. This is the ONLY forum for this type of activity. You may also advertise links to the eBay forum in your signature. Please note that selling directly in contravention of these rules will result in a warning / suspension / ban.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

[URL of 27MB Xolo update ZIP file - sniffed!]

26 posts in this topic

Posted (edited) · Report post

Hi guys.

For those who are interested, I packet sniffed and downloaded (on my PC) the 27MB Xolo "update" that causes all the problems and prevents rooting...

http://dl1.innopath....2416&m=1&j=91xs

You can also try:

http://dl1.innopath....v1/fota/383.dat

Rename it to .ZIP if it comes down as .DAT, and explore (just DO NOT install!)

*** Curiously, if you remove the last digit of 383.dat in the URL bar, and make it into 380, 381 etc, it downloads different sized updates... hmm... wonder what they all are ;) ...

### COULD THE JELLYBEAN UPDATE BE HERE?! :D ###

Edited by glossywhite
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

i change the last numbers in the ***.dat but the download remains the same i.e 383.dat ?

ok sorted it with a different browser ;-)

Edited by shootomanUK
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

ive downloaded a few of the zips and most of the files end with ".p"

like this : build.prop.p

and in the build prop it contains a load of mumbled jargon lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

But probably the list doesn't just contain x900 related downloads..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

But probably the list doesn't just contain x900 related downloads..

I downloaded six consecutive ZIP files from this server, and each says x900 in the install check scripts.

I don't work with probably or maybe.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

be careful as some of those roms are unsigned

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

be careful as some of those roms are unsigned

Thanks Ricky :)

I would never risk flashing *anything* except what was verified as working - I like my free San Diego that the kind Orange lady *gave* me, and don't want to spoil it :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I downloaded six consecutive ZIP files from this server, and each says x900 in the install check scripts.

I don't work with probably or maybe.

That's cool, because i didn't looked for each one of them so i had to say..

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That's cool, because i didn't looked for each one of them so i had to say..

I understand :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I understand :)

If you can please check the server for any new update. zip for x900 please... I don't know server hack

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Looks like there is a jellybean update on one of those links... although not specifically for the X900. For those who want a look, its update #478. JB version is 4.1.2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Looks like there is a jellybean update on one of those links... although not specifically for the X900. For those who want a look, its update #478. JB version is 4.1.2.

Just d/l 553mb

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Anyone wanna take the leap of faith and install?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

Anyone wanna take the leap of faith and install?

If it has "x900" mentioned in build.prop* then it should be the one.

[uPDATE]

Downloading now, but no way am I installing it before some deep forensic investigation :)

Edited by glossywhite
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

If it has "x900" mentioned in build.prop* then it should be the one.

[uPDATE]

Downloading now, but no way am I installing it before some deep forensic investigation :)

Just extracting a massive zip within it called SparkResource

Have they got a phone model called "Spark"?

Build prop is a "P" file extension

Edited by Andymac1969
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Just extracting a massive zip within it called SparkResource

Have they got a phone model called "Spark"?

Sounds rather incendiary... like it could BLOW UP your handset! :o LOL

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Tried to have a look in build.prop when I DLed but as someone mentioned its a .p file - seems to be either be compressed/encrypted or whatnot as I can't read it at all.

I found out it was JB by looking in META-INF/com/Android/metadata:


fromgb=False

post-build=Intel/AQ710A/Salitpa:4.1.2/JZO54K/V1.0.9:user/release-keys

post-timestamp=1365565898

pre-build=Intel/AQ710A/Salitpa:4.1.2/JZO54K/wa-1:user/release-keys

pre-device=Salitpa

Wonder what an Intel AQ710A is? And if Intel uses the same encryption keys on all their devices (their reference devices, not say Moto RAZR i)?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That P is pascal language, but way way over my head

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Tried to have a look in build.prop when I DLed but as someone mentioned its a .p file - seems to be either be compressed/encrypted or whatnot as I can't read it at all.

I found out it was JB by looking in META-INF/com/Android/metadata:


fromgb=False

post-build=Intel/AQ710A/Salitpa:4.1.2/JZO54K/V1.0.9:user/release-keys

post-timestamp=1365565898

pre-build=Intel/AQ710A/Salitpa:4.1.2/JZO54K/wa-1:user/release-keys

pre-device=Salitpa

Wonder what an Intel AQ710A is? And if Intel uses the same encryption keys on all their devices (their reference devices, not say Moto RAZR i)?

Yes, I saw that and was about to post it.

AVOID THIS UPDATE AND DO NOT FLASH IT

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yes, I saw that and was about to post it.

AVOID THIS UPDATE AND DO NOT FLASH IT

You do not have to SHOUT to get a point across.

Can you spell hypocrite?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Monkeys? That's not a kind thing to say - they're still humans with feelings and they deserve as much respect as you or I, no matter how dismissive or offhand they may be.

Forgiveness is powerful, or you'll end up being bitter and judgemental.

LOL!

Orange "customer service" - this is who answers your calls...

8671737885_a43ceb534b_z.jpg

Lol, I guess not... :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I would politely ask anyone attempting to cause arguments and pick fault, not to do so, if for nothing else, then for their own sake, as they risk a possible ban.

I have been asked by a certain member, not to quote them in posts, as it appears they dislike me, for whatever reasons. However, said member seems to think that their own rule does not apply to them, and that it is acceptable to deride and taunt in public, in a childish manner.

Please do continue, and enjoy your weekend.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I would politely ask anyone attempting to cause arguments and pick fault, not to do so, if for nothing else, then for their own sake, as they risk a possible ban.

I have been asked by a certain member, not to quote them in posts, as it appears they dislike me, for whatever reasons. However, said member seems to think that their own rule does not apply to them, and that it is acceptable to deride and taunt in public, in a childish manner.

Please do continue, and enjoy your weekend.

I don't know if it's just me who thinks this, but you seem patronising in so many of your posts
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Would it benefit anyone if I spoke my mind and vented? It would get me banned, and cause offence to others, neither of which I want.

See it as me holding my tongue and talking as calmly as I can, considering the bitterness and unkindness of some people. I'm not a patronising person, but I'm human and have feelings as we all do, and if that appears patronising unintentionally, that's better than willfully being rude and aggressive.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2015. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.