Jump to content
  • Sign in to follow this  

    Orange Santa Clara becomes the San Diego and gets a 6th June launch date

    As chronicled in our liveblog this morning, Orange have now announced the new name for the 'Santa Clara' Intel power device - it is now known as the 'San Diego' and will hit stores on 6th June.


    The new device has been 'coming soon' for a long time but we finally have specifics on the release... let's start by recapping the specs.

    Specs / Hardware

    The San Diego is of course the first Intel powered Android device in the UK and is based on the Intel reference design, manufactured by Gigabyte. The device uses an Intel Atom Z2460 processor at 1.6GHz (single core) with HyperThreading support, the GPU is a PowerVR SGX 540 @ 400 MHz. Of course, the CPU is the real difference from Android devices that have gone before, the other specs are as follows...

    • Android 2.3 Gingerbread
    • 16GB ROM
    • 1GB RAM
    • GSM bands 1900/1800/900/850 MHz
    • HSDPA Cat 14 (21.1Mbps)
    • HSUPA Cat 6 (5.7Mbps)
    • UMTS bands 2100/1900/900/850 MHz
    • GPRS / EDGE Class 10
    • Bluetooth v2.1
    • A-GPS support
    • WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
    • 4.03" 600x1024 screen
    • 8 Megapixel camera with LED flash, 10 pictures per second burst capture, image stabilisation, scene detection & tuning, advanced high dynamic range, ultra low light capture
    • 1.3 Megapixel front camera
    • 1080p video capture
    • HD voice
    • NFC
    • HDMI out
      [*}Dual mics for noise cancellation
    • microSIM
    • 5.4 Whr battery
    • 123mm x 63mm x 9.99mm
    • 117g

    Not bad. The only real downer I guess is the lack of microSD expansion, but that does really seem par for the course at the moment. The use of a 1024x600 screen is very unusual and is something we've seen only on tablets up to now.

    Design wise, the device is shiny black on the front, with a matte black finish on the back and matte silver finish around the edges of the device. The front has 4 capacitive buttons (back, menu, home and search), the power button and 3.5mm socket is on top of the device, the speakers and microUSB output are on the bottom, the right hand side of the device has a camera button, volume buttons and the microSIM tray and the left hand side has the HDMI port.


    Overall, the device feels very nice in the hand. Not 'cheap' - it feels like a premium device. The back of the device has the 'Intel Inside' logo proudly displayed, something Orange are going to be making a big deal of!





    In the box

    In the box you'll find the device, a mains USB adaptor, microUSB cable, headset, quick start guide, orange services guide and SIM tray pin.



    The San Diego ships with Android 2.3 Gingerbread with an update to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich currently in testing. This doesn't mean it's imminent though, although there is not an official date, I did hear October mentioned.

    As you would expect for an Orange own-brand device, the software build has been somewhat 'orangeified'. That said, this was primarily in the form of the launcher and a few additional Orange apps, so I would imagine it could be easily de-orangified again... although I'll reserve judgement until i've had a proper play!

    I know you guys would expect me to take a picture of the software version information screen... so I did. :)


    The device is running Gingerbread version 2.3.7 (the latest) and kernel version

    It feels smooth navigating around the device in the brief time I had with it, no complaints there. The camera app is pretty fully featured and the 'burst mode' on the camera is particularly impressive... 10 pictures in a second!

    Some readers might be concerned about incompatibility with apps optimised for ARM - The San Diego uses binary translation to run ARM apps (and can run 'just about everything' so we're told), with minimal performance deficit. Intel are also very keen to point out that they've worked very closely with Google to optimise Android for the Intel platform.


    I was chatting to MoDaCo team member Flibblesan earlier this week about likely pricing for the device earlier this week, and said I expected it to be around £200 (ideally £179.99) on prepay and very cheap on a contract. Turns out I was pretty much spot on.

    The San Diego will be £199.99 on Prepay (with a £10 topup) and free on a £15.50 24 month contract. Users buying on Prepay will receive 12 months of free 250MB/month mobile data.


    The launch of the San Diego will be supported by a multi million pound advertising campaign across TV, outdoor, print and online - the first time an Orange own-brand device has been featured in TV advertisements and by far the highest marketing spend on an ODM device to date (no doubt thanks to some of Intel's cash). The device will get a full month of primary in store advertising, which is also unprecedented for an own brand device.


    Hackability of the San Diego is a great unknown at the moment! We don't know how locked down it will be, we don't know what form the bootloader will take on the Intel chipset and, well, we don't know anything.

    I will be getting one and having a poke around though as well as writing a full review, watch this space! :)


    I'm actually impressed having seen the San Diego in person. The screen, with that unusual 1024x600 resolution on a 4" panel, looks very nice indeed. The materials seem good and it feels well built. All of this adds up to shelf appeal in store - something that Android also adds - so I think the handset will do well.

    I've been trying to decide if it's going to be another 'Android fan hit' in the style of the San Francisco and while I think there's a chance of this, I can see 3 potential issues. 1 is the lack of ICS, the second is the 'unknown' around hackability and the third... sadly, is the price. While £199 is pretty decent, the (admittedly inferior in many respects) Ascend G300 from Huawei is literally half the price... it's a shame the San Diego couldn't have landed at £149.99 perhaps.

    I'm really interested to see how this one is going to play out... Intel have arrived... let the fun begin! ;)

      Report Item
    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Gaz, They were manufactured with gingerbread, but Intel reputably already has a stable ICS available for rollout. No doubt, once enough people hold the phone, and the 'fruity' bloatware ;-) has been added the rollout will begin. Intel/Lava./Orange have consistantly been promising an 'early' ICS upgrade rollout at all the trade shows (i've seen on YouTube).

    Obviously similar promises have been made (and broken) in the past by other manufacturers regarding ICS, but it seems to me that Intel are super focused on this being a success given it's their first venture into the mobile world, and the commercial success of their SoC is at a critical point.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    bluetooth 2.1? are we not on 3.0 now?

    edit bluetooth is now on 4.0, and 3.0 has been out since 2009, how old is this chipset?

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    bluetooth 2.1? are we not on 3.0 now?

    edit bluetooth is now on 4.0, and 3.0 has been out since 2009, how old is this chipset?

    Agreed, that's one thing they've neglected here, but it does have a dedicated 400MHz GPU,(something orange didn't pick up on!) and it's completley new kit and kaboodle chipwise!! Look up 'xolo x900 reviews' The same phone with basiclly just different back shell/'camera look'... It needed a different back cover <anyaway> since that's where the mobile operator's logo is emblazened!. ;-)

    Both Operators chose the Intel reference design and ran with it. Quite a nice design at that. the front camera is capable of 720p for example!

    eg. here


    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Social

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By the way, wearing a case makes phone ugly and makes operation inconvenient. I think when most people choose a phone, the appearance is a major factor to consider, including the color. But in fact most people will put a case on the phone for fear of breaks, then it changes the phone look. As a NOMU fan, I strongly support it as I never need to wear a case to it as it is super drop-proof.
    • ZTE Axon 7 Mini Build quality & display
      When it comes to size, the Mini is only slightly smaller than the Axon 7. In fact, the size difference is hard to notice unless you actually put both phones side by side. The Mini measures 5.8 by 2.8 by 0.3 inches and weighs 5.4 ounces, making it just a bit smaller and lighter than the Axon 7 (6.0 by 3.0 by 0.3 inches, 6.2 ounces), but not nearly as small as the more genuinely miniaturized Sony Xperia X. The phone hasn't undergone any major changes in design, either. You get the same metal unibody build available in gray or gold, the same gentlyback, and the same button and port placement. a volume rocker and power button on the right side, a USB-C charging port on the bottom, a 3.5mm audio jack up top, and a SIM/microSD card slot on the left (which worked with a 256GB card). The back is home to a responsive fingerprint scanner set below the camera sensor. The Axon 7 Mini's 1,920-by-1,080, 5.2-inch AMOLED display is smaller, and less sharp, than the 5.5-inch Quad HD panel on its larger sibling. It has 423 pixels per inch, compared with 538ppi on the Axon 7. That said, many other phones in this size range like the 5-inch Google Pixel, and the 5.5-inch Moto G4 also have 1080p panels. The Mini benefits from rich colors, great viewing angles, and a maximum brightness that's easy to see outdoors. Performance
      The phone is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 processor. It's a midrange chipset, nowhere near as powerful as the Snapdragon 820 you get the larger device. There's also less RAM, 3GB instead of 4GB. Unsurprisingly, this results in significantly lower benchmark results. The Mini scores 46,859 on AnTuTu, which measures overall system performance, which is a lot lower than the Axon 7's 141,989. It's on par with other midrange phones like the Snapdragon 617-powered G4 (46,260) and the Snapdragon 430-powered X2 (43,984). That said, performance is still fairly smooth. While we encountered some stuttering when running lots of apps in the background, it wasn't any worse than you'll encounter on most midrange phones. A software update pushed out during testing seems to reduce many instances of sluggishness. The phone also handles games like Asphalt 8 and GTA: San Andreas without any difficulty. Camera quality
      Camera performance on the Mini's 16-megapixel rear sensor is solid, but it isn't particularly noteworthy. The phone takes good shots outdoors under brightly lit conditions, but compared with the 20-megapixel sensor on the Axon 7, it doesn't capture as much detail. In a shootout with the Axon 7 (in default Auto HDR mode), we noticed more instances of noise, a slower autofocus, slower shutter speeds, and notably worse low-light performance. The 8-megapixel front sensor is and still takes good selfies and video.   Youtube Review   Connectivity
      2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
      3G: WCDMA 850/900/1700/1900/2100MHz
      4G: FDD-LTE B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B19/B20 TDD-LTE B38/B40/B41 For more information please visit ZTE Axon 7 Mini. Thank you :)
    • The first feature of the Nomu T18 will be the ability to connect an external digital camera. The second feature is the possibility of working as a walkie-talkie, that is, a walkie-talkie.
    • That's true. A case can’t withstand the drop impact, maybe works a
      little, but all in all it mostly will get scratch, pieces. This phone
      deserves a try. By the way, wearing a case makes phone ugly and makes
      operation inconvenient. I think when most people choose a phone, the
      appearance is a major factor to consider, including the color. But in
      fact most people will put a case on the phone for fear of breaks, then
      it changes the phone look. As a NOMU fan, I strongly support it as I
      never need to wear a case to it as it is super drop-proof.
    • Hello, I have finally managed to gain access to my Dropbox account where I have managed to get my hands on a compatibility patch that we used for these devices. Assuming you now have CM11 installed, this may help matters. Let me know your email in a Private Mail message and I can get the compatibility patch to you.