I ordered one 2 weeks ago. Still waiting. Great specs for a good price. There are some problems, though. Especially the charging troubles me. From what I've read, the phone charges to no more than 85(6,7?)%( even if it shows full) and for a full charge you must use an external charger. That itself combined with a suboptimal battery capacity can make some trouble for heavy-users.
If you want you can try google translate on http://androidforum.cz/zavady-a-problemy-s-inew-v3-t51885-120.html . It's a thread dedicated to V3 problems.
Nah :-/ . I tried both and many others with no luck. All gone in under 2 sec. I forgot to log once, with another one I actually clicked in time but when I had selected the bundle, the item was already marked as sold. Guess those chineese are too quick for me. :) I managed to win one $30 coupon for $15 though. :) Damn, those would have been very good christmas presents.
No wonder if they sell items for 10% of their price. I am more than willing to wait for a $100 TCL Idol X http://gaga.aliexpress.com/250539016-1002459919-detail.html or a $50 8" tablet http://gaga.aliexpress.com/250610012-1220096076-detail.html.
The price is good but they charge $40 for DHL. :( I recieved one Haier through China Post. It took 36 days with a tax fee worth of $35 to arrive. The second one came through DHL in 8 days with no fee. I'll go with DHL again. :)
1. Yes, it does. I don't know about about L&F support but I can't see why it should't work.
2. I applied a screen protector using the wet method (lots of tries and water :)) while keeping the phone running and the phone works flawlessly. I'd say it is waterproof. Of course, I won't try to throw it in water but I think it could handle a few second in it (it's certified as IP54).
3. Yes, it does.
Exactly. There is an English guide in one of my posts that can be easily followed (a PDF with polish and english language guide). Root is as easy as it can be using one-click eRoot (mentioned in the guide). The rest is a classic CWM work.
EDIT: oops. I posted the guide link in some weird way. The address shown was correct but the link itself wasn't. I's now been corrected. Sorry 'bout that. :)