23 replies to this topic

[daffy]

some pics by mpx220

Attached Files

•  DSC_00012.jpg   151.74K   644 downloads
•  DSC_00011.jpg   119.47K   637 downloads

[haso0on]

its still blurry....
but how did u get these pictures..do u have an MPx220 ?

[McHale]

I'm not sure if the pics are blurry because of the phone or because of the person taking it.  Whenever I take a pic with a camera phone, 1/2 the time they are blurry because I can't keep my hand/arm steady.  

Without having one to test myself, it's at least something to consider...

-Mc

[daffy]

Quote

do u have an MPx220 ?

yes...it's a prerelease AT&T Wireless branded

[haso0on]

Quote

I'm not sure if the pics are blurry because of the phone or because of the person taking it.  Whenever I take a pic with a camera phone, 1/2 the time they are blurry because I can't keep my hand/arm steady.  

Without having one to test myself, it's at least something to consider...

-Mc

but it wouldnt be THIS blury, if you compare these pictures with the nokia 7610 (1MP) their much clear than the 1.23 MP of the MPx220
and both of them dont have the stabler

[McHale]

I dunno.  Shaky hands can turn the best camera into a real blurry pic.  I'm famous for it!  I used a friend's LG L1200 which has a pretty decent camera and 1/2 the time, my pics would look like Stevie Wonder took them.  

However, I haven't seen a single pic taken with the MPx220 that was clear though.  You may be completely right...

-Mc

[Helix]

Thoose pictures have bad purple fringing, nothing to do his hand shaking.

[moviecut]

it seems to me, that this is a vga-cam interpolating the resolution to 1,2MP...

[meatgrinder]

i would agree with you moviecut - it is not a "true" 1.23mp camera.

and i can take pics with my c500 with movement, and they dont blur anything like the steadiest piccies i've taken with my old e200.

Dave

[Helix]

Is'nt the whole idea of VGA is it's resolution is 640x480. I thought SVGA was 1024x768.

[haso0on]

the K700i has the extended resolution of 1024x768

[haso0on]

@daffy
try to take pictures with a lower resolution

[daffy]

macro and the same pic at  640x480 and 1280x960

Attached Files

•  DSC_00010.jpg   151.59K   377 downloads
•  DSC_00009.jpg   40.14K   378 downloads
•  DSC_00007.jpg   202.96K   372 downloads

[haso0on]

thanks man for the pictures
i guess motorola wasnt able to fix the problem yet....

[AvWijk]

A bit resized and polished up, the result is reasonable!  

Attached Files

•  pic.jpg   0bytes   206 downloads

[McHale]

not bad, but compared to the C500, well... there is no comparison.  The C500 is MUCH better.    I do plan on taking lots of pics with my phone so all things being equal, this could be a deal changer...

-Mc

[AvWijk]

In fact, I have to tell people all the time that its still to EARLY to compare
I saw the Sendo X in its early days the camera quality was also like s***..

[haso0on]

the phone is SUPPOSED to come out in 2 weeks time!

[McHale]

Howard did a review on Haward Forums  (a VERY biased forum by the way).  He must have had a very early ROM.  The pics in his review taken by the camera are much worse than the pics in this thread (strange colors on the borders).  In fact, I went and compared the quality of the pics in this thread to the pics in the C500 REVIEW thread and the MPx220 pics are every bit as good.

I'm buying the MPx220 for sure now.  The pics are every bit as good if not better than the C500...

-Mc