5 replies to this topic

[hunyango_uk]

don't know so much bout processors. but i think these phones are faster than mpx:

imate jam/htc magician/xda mini/mda compact
xda ii/m1000
xdaiis/pda2k

yet mpx (arm omap 733 195mhz), is expensive than this the ppc phones above.i mean come on.

if i'm wrong please enlighten me.

thanks.

http://www.howardfor...threadid=550550

Attached Files

•  untitled.bmp   600.06K   26 downloads

Edited by hunyango_uk, 02 March 2005 - 01:24 AM.

[hunyango_uk]

don't know if this is smartphone or ppc phone?

[fraser]

Image on screen and stylus suggest PPC to me. I don't know if I'd want a normally landscape phone to be honest. Sure, it's a little better for many applications, but most PPC 2002 software doesn't display well. Not bad long term once software is updated, but awkard right now.

That's the phone that you open up two ways though, right? That's a cool feature.

[Pondrew]

The MPX is an expensive toy. Nice to look at but nothing more besides.

As far as Pocket PCs go it's a joke. The review you've linked to says itself that a two year old XDA is a better example...

[hunyango_uk]

i fancied of having one before. The design is very nice, but i think i'm not going for the design.

Looks are deceiving!!!

some sites won't put the description of the processor in their review.i was kind of thinking "why they did not?"

Performance is really poor.

why the hell i'm going to buy one?

[hunyango_uk]

on all the review of mpx models (mpx, 200,220)

i'd rather go with mpx200 or mpx220. rather than mpx.

sorry for the mpx lover, they are ripping lots of money from a crop.(sorry to be rude) 8)