Guest am0k Posted June 5, 2005 Report Share Posted June 5, 2005 just for your information... a site (wich is currently offline) is claiming to have the magneto rom for the mpx200 of course i can´t give links but attached is a picture mpx owners better start searchin now :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gitkua Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 (edited) Have a look HERE Edited June 6, 2005 by gitkua Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gitkua Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 Have a look HERE <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Can you enlighten me with your motives to edit my post??? I didn't post any url's or requested roms or anything.. I was only asking the original poster where he found the picture that he posted... nothing more nothing less. Is that something illegal, and if so, why wasn't his post deleted?? seems to me you're a bit to eager to edit posts... i was doing nothing wrong, and your rules url doesn't say anything about asking for the source of a picture.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pondrew Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 (edited) Am0k made it clear the picture was from the site in question and he also made it clear he wouldn't provide the link. Is there really anything to argue over here?! Edited June 6, 2005 by Pondrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gitkua Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 Am0k made it clear the picture was from the site in question and he also made it clear he wouldn't provide the link. Is there really anything to argue over here?! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maybe there's nothing to argue over.... but I just can't see the problem... I was only asking where he got the picture from... Why is that wrong? don't you think it's a bit overrated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chocula81 Posted June 9, 2005 Report Share Posted June 9, 2005 Can you tell us how does WM5 work on the MPX200? Is it true or just a fake? Maybe you can give us interesting information about it without breaking the forum rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest am0k Posted June 9, 2005 Report Share Posted June 9, 2005 Can you tell us how does WM5 work on the MPX200? Is it true or just a fake? Maybe you can give us interesting information about it without breaking the forum rules. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1. i don´t have it on my phone. 2. it´s not fake 3. everything else has been said (per pm ;)) and pondrew is right posting the link to the source of that pic would be like telling that link and the thread should have been closed 5 posts ago :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest randn Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 1. i don´t have it on my phone. 2. it´s not fake 3. everything else has been said (per pm ;)) and pondrew is right posting the link to the source of that pic would be like telling that link and the thread should have been closed 5 posts ago :D <{POST_SNAPBACK}> yes it does work. i have it running (ie WM5 on mpx200). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Madeye Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 yes it does work. i have it running (ie WM5 on mpx200). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Shhhh... stop talkin about naughty software you lot! :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rampe Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 yes it does work. i have it running (ie WM5 on mpx200). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, why don't you tell us more. Is it faster? Is it stable? Is it better? Is it pretty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest awarner [MVP] Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 It certainly will not be faster and should be slower than 2003 as 2003 is slower than 2002 due to the increased memory usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gitkua Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 It certainly will not be faster and should be slower than 2003 as 2003 is slower than 2002 due to the increased memory usage. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well I can't agree with you on that one... I have 2003 running on my mpx200 for some time now, and it's way faster and more stable than 2002. 2003 is taking less space on my mobile than 2002 was. I quess it's more compressed or something. But it works way faster and the battery life has improved as well... I don't know exactly wich firmware I've got, m.s extended rom or something? But it's way better than the orginal 2002 firmware. So 2005 doesn't have to be slower. I could be faster for all we know. Nobody has posted any experiences. So you can't say that for sure. If microsoft developers used it to test 2005 on, it has to be running okay. Why would they test it on the mpx200 if it wasn't running normally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest awarner [MVP] Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 If you check you will find the physical memory is less running 2003 than 2002. Also I can say for sure that on the MPX200 it will run slower as does 2003. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gitkua Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 If you check you will find the physical memory is less running 2003 than 2002. Also I can say for sure that on the MPX200 it will run slower as does 2003. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> because you have experience with wm2005 on the mpx200?? If you don't, the you can't say for sure can you. My physical memory is the same with 2003.... It just runs faster and more stable with 2003... that's it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest am0k Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 it is slower. it has been said before: mpx200 is the lowest device to run wm05 it needs an sd card because the rom wouldn´t fit. if the sd card is bigger than 32mb it will run even slower because of memory locating... because you have experience with wm2005 on the mpx200?? If you don't, the you can't say for sure can you. My physical memory is the same with 2003.... It just runs faster and more stable with 2003... that's it <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pondrew Posted June 11, 2005 Report Share Posted June 11, 2005 gitkua, no one knows the MPX200 better then Awarner! At least, no one outside Chi Mei the manufacturers. He knows it inside and out having contributed massively to this forums understanding of all things Motorola Smartphone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wen1 Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 Did anyone install it ?. Did anyone get it ? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts