96 replies to this topic

[fense]

ock 23541_M2D 302.1446

Edited by fense, 27 February 2010 - 04:12 PM.

[Raheel Anjum]

I am currently using Pdhee build 23540 ultralite and believe me it is very fast. SKtools Interger score 309.75.

[g3n3ral]

rendeiro2005, on Feb 27 2010, 09:26, said:

hi g3n3ral,
this is the results from ock_UltraLite_23541 299.9

ei thanks... keep posting bro

[g3n3ral]

g3n3ral, on Feb 13 2010, 19:31, said:

benchmark integer test performance  

#chef currently on list ( free to request rom and chef )  who chef do you preferred
( you can help me updating the thread post by posting your benchmark result )

-PDhee --> currently have the fastest rom base on benchmark test
-Ock

performance percentage base on sktools benchmark
the higher the better  

#235XX

305 ock_M2D_23529
308 PDhee_i900Omnia_23529.5.5.0_Lite_beta1
313 PDhee_i900Omnia_23534_lite_beta1 ( fastest yet )
308 PDhee_i900Omnia_23540_Lite_beta1
300 ock_UltraLite_23541

#282XX

310 ock_PremiumSpecialEdition_ 28218
309 PDhee_i900Omnia_28223.5.3.3_Lite_beta1
307 PDhee_i900Omnia_28217_M2D_beta1
311 PDhee_i900Omnia_28230.5.3.3_Lite_beta1

#218XX

304 ock_21889_UltraLitev2.zip
303 PDhee_i900Omnia_21891.5.0.88_Lite_beta1
307 PDhee_i900Omnia_21892_Lite_beta2 ( sleep bug )
303 PDhee_i900Omnia_21889_M2D_beta2  

#220XX

311 ock_UltraLite_22004
305 ock_M2D_22004

any one interested to my speed compilation.... if so i will continue posting
free to request other chef just indicate what build

[shokka9]

Just out of curiosity.....

Can somebody benchmark a few of my ROMs (old be it, but very nice!)

Thanks....

6.1 and 6.5 if possible, be interesting to see how they compare to others and also old against new?

Much appreciated.

[g3n3ral]

fense, on Feb 27 2010, 16:11, said:

ock 23541_M2D 302.1446

thanks for helping

Raheel Anjum, on Feb 28 2010, 05:49, said:

I am currently using Pdhee build 23540 ultralite and believe me it is very fast. SKtools Interger score 309.75.

thanks

shokka9, on Mar 3 2010, 14:34, said:

Just out of curiosity.....

Can somebody benchmark a few of my ROMs (old be it, but very nice!)

Thanks....

6.1 and 6.5 if possible, be interesting to see how they compare to others and also old against new?

Much appreciated.

6.1 has lower  benchmark than 6.5 don't know why...

Edited by g3n3ral, 03 March 2010 - 02:45 PM.

[shokka9]

g3n3ral, on Mar 3 2010, 14:44, said:

6.1 has lower  benchmark than 6.5 don't know why...

i do....

its to do with the slots (virtual RAM)..... 6.5 is different and is capable of more processes etc than 6.1.

See here if 'you are really' concerned

http://forum.xda-dev...amp;postcount=2

but i meant my 6.1's compared to other 6.1's...

Thanks bro!

Edited by shokka9, 03 March 2010 - 03:22 PM.

[loopism]

Compuse, on Feb 27 2010, 21:14, said:

Nicklashidegard, with all his flavors and variations, he made us the most stable ones!  

I got 302 with Nicks HIDE19 24001 Neo ROM

[Sb.]

I think you maybe need to get the tests from at least 3 different phones, I'm sure that each phone will give different readings judging by the responses in each thread regarding speeds but then again realistically when using how much can you really notice? I flash almost everyone's ROM and most of the time can hardly see any difference in speed for same builds, just depends on whats cooked in like M2D etc. I personally think people are getting too carried away with hopes of using another rom because its 1 millionth of a second quicker than the other. My point is how many seconds faster is one ROM running compared to another doing certain tasks?

[ock]

Sb., on Mar 4 2010, 16:39, said:

I think you maybe need to get the tests from at least 3 different phones, I'm sure that each phone will give different readings judging by the responses in each thread regarding speeds but then again realistically when using how much can you really notice? I flash almost everyone's ROM and most of the time can hardly see any difference in speed for same builds, just depends on whats cooked in like M2D etc. I personally think people are getting too carried away with hopes of using another rom because its 1 millionth of a second quicker than the other. My point is how many seconds faster is one ROM running compared to another doing certain tasks?

Fully agree with you, Sb. I'm not really a fan of benchmarks cause the readings tend to fluctuate even on the same rom
Just pick a rom that suits you best, you won't go wrong with the roms here  

[lupus_hegemonia]

I'm looking forward for a fresh new build, with stable/fast/good performance, great battery life etc..., I've spoke with quite few "cookers" and all of them told me... "stick with 6.1s"!
So, till I find a GOOD/STABLE 6.5 rom, I'm still using my signature's rom ("KC" 6.1 build 21001 from OMNIA II).
Cheers.

[sudkcoce]

lupus_hegemonia, on Mar 4 2010, 15:12, said:

I'm looking forward for a fresh new build, with stable/fast/good performance, great battery life etc..., I've spoke with quite few "cookers" and all of them told me... "stick with 6.1s"!
So, till I find a GOOD/STABLE 6.5 rom, I'm still using my signature's rom ("KC" 6.1 build 21001 from OMNIA II).
Cheers.

I was sticking to the 6.1 (QBUS) for the same reason for a long time.

I was wrong. The 6.5.x builds are, imho, now as stable and as fast (if not faster) as the 6.1. And there are really many benefits when using 6.5.x builds!

I am currently using ock's 22004 premium and before I was using pdhee's COM2 build.

I think you should try it out...

[lupus_hegemonia]

sudkcoce, on Mar 4 2010, 17:08, said:

I was sticking to the 6.1 (QBUS) for the same reason for a long time.

I was wrong. The 6.5.x builds are, imho, now as stable and as fast (if not faster) as the 6.1. And there are really many benefits when using 6.5.x builds!

I am currently using ock's 22004 premium and before I was using pdhee's COM2 build.

I think you should try it out...

Thxs, m8.
Another problem of mine is this:

I'm using 1-2 "Today screen" plugins, like a greek name-holidays app ("Eortologio"), which is a 6.1's app (I don't know if the developer made a 6.5 ver)...
HOW CAN I use 6.1s' apps (with their "Today screen" horizontal pannels) in a 6.5 rom???

BTW... any SPECIFIC 6.5 suggestion, m8?

[raaj13]

khaunchai 21928 3 in 1 is giving 315.2733 in integer benchmark and 8.784 in floating point (with no titanium or m2d enabled in home screen)
311.76 in integer and 8.781 in floating point with titanium enabled.

Edited by raaj13, 05 March 2010 - 01:34 PM.

[sudkcoce]

lupus_hegemonia, on Mar 4 2010, 16:53, said:

BTW... any SPECIFIC 6.5 suggestion, m8?

Get _any_ of the top chefs roms: pdhee, ock or niclashidegard's.
My hands are itching again, this time I want to try nicks 23103 (I have read 231xx builds are htc branch...) build.
Enjoy and post comments...

[raaj13]

lupus_hegemonia, on Mar 4 2010, 21:23, said:

BTW... any SPECIFIC 6.5 suggestion, m8?

u need to find that out for urself whose rom u lyk

[lupus_hegemonia]

raaj13, on Mar 9 2010, 16:18, said:

u need to find that out for urself whose rom u lyk

I wasn't refering about "cookers', but... for BUILDS!
That's what I'm asking you, lads...
Which build you suggesting...

[sinancetinkaya]

SKTools benchmark is not a good benchmark tool to see overall performance

For instance sktools shows wm6.5 is faster than wm6.1 but in real life it's exactly the opposite

When I increase the file system cache, it increases overall performance but sktools still shows the same value. Use SPB bechmark, it's much better. I know it's hard to use but better.

[lupus_hegemonia]

sinancetinkaya, on Mar 9 2010, 17:43, said:

SKTools benchmark is not a good benchmark tool to see overall performance

For instance sktools shows wm6.5 is faster than wm6.1 but in real life it's exactly the opposite

When I increase the file system cache, it increases overall performance but sktools still shows the same value. Use SPB bechmark, it's much better. I know it's hard to use but better.

Merhaba, arkadas! Nasilsin iz?

Hehehe... Hello, "neighbor" from my grandmother's land! How are ya?
I wouldn't agree more on this comment!!! I just "turned" to 6.5s... only for their dark layouts!!! Too me, Shokka9's or KC build 21001 (from Omnia II) 6.1s... are FAR more fast/stable than many 6.5s I've tested.
But, you have to admit, 6.5s are more good looking, more beautiful roms...

Gorusuruz!

[chandanbs]

Lets not forget .. all our omnias are built for WM 6.1, thats why WM 6.5 builds are always been beta so far .. on omnia