105 replies to this topic

[Ang3l0912]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 14:31, said:

im just having quikc check now thanks for offer tho

ok unfortuantly i couldnt get wifi to function i used blade files for help all i managed was loss touch screen lol

Edited by Ang3l0912, 09 March 2011 - 02:35 PM.

[equiliym]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 15:35, said:

ok unfortuantly i couldnt get wifi to function i used blade files for help all i managed was loss touch screen lol

just a tought, can you try libs from 2.1, would they work?

[Vlatko25]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 15:35, said:

ok unfortuantly i couldnt get wifi to function i used blade files for help all i managed was loss touch screen lol

so till now,the 2.2 rom needs wifi to work?or camera and calibration still bug?what is your progres since last posted upload?any fix
Have a luck:) I SUPPORT YOU

[Ang3l0912]

equiliym, on Mar 9 2011, 14:39, said:

just a tought, can you try libs from 2.1, would they work?

the onli way to test about 2.1 files is to try yourself but im nto sure it will =[

[equiliym]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 15:41, said:

the onli way to test about 2.1 files is to try yourself but im nto sure it will =[

well okay, ill try that later, will post results but i doubth it

[Vlatko25]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 15:41, said:

the onli way to test about 2.1 files is to try yourself but im nto sure it will =[

i  must have pc to change files?or i can do it with something else?push link with last rom 2.2 i can give it a try

[Ang3l0912]

Vlatko25, on Mar 9 2011, 14:45, said:

i  must have pc to change files?or i can do it with something else?push link with last rom 2.2 i can give it a try

i think basicly we got to fact ov evrythign works besides wifi and camera

[Ang3l0912]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 14:57, said:

i think basicly we got to fact ov evrythign works besides wifi and camera

right we need to find out how to fix this wifi issue if we all google possible fixes try them or even suggest them we get further i hope come on peole lets get wifi going

[Ang3l0912]

Just update people whiel quickly searching it could be linked to the WPA_suplicant or somethign if thats not right no wifi at all even with drivers and modules also could be file permission but i tryed that maybe i havent excuted properly but didnt work for me

Edited by Ang3l0912, 09 March 2011 - 04:42 PM.

[Vlatko25]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 9 2011, 16:18, said:

Just update people whiel quickly searching it could be linked to the WPA_suplicant or somethign if thats not right no wifi at all even with drivers and modules also could be file permission but i tryed that maybe i havent excuted properly but didnt work for me

any progress guys
any of you!!!!!!!!!!

[equiliym]

well, im out of options, whatever i tried, just got messed up more.. leaving it to the pro's

[Ang3l0912]

equiliym, on Mar 9 2011, 20:35, said:

well, im out of options, whatever i tried, just got messed up more.. leaving it to the pro's

look at new topic in forum would appreciate it

[shuaidi]

I know blade's system can fix wifi bug. And I have tried many times. But failed. If using blade's system, touch screen is diffcult to fix. Becau the size of the screen is different. Rresistance and capacitance screen are different too.

[Sebastian404]

The Blade uses a different touch screen to the racer..

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MSM

vs

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_SYNAPTICS_I2C_RMI
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_CYPRESS_I2C_RMI

(the blade has at least two different hardware versions, so the kernel has to include both)


As for the Camera, there seems to be another (slight difference)

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_SOCKET

vs

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_FPC

The blade seem to have the same camera hardware, but interfaced differently....

There are other differences, I should be able to build a Blade Kernel using the hardware options from the Racer...  I'll see if that makes any difference...

Edited by Sebastian404, 10 March 2011 - 10:39 AM.

[Ang3l0912]

Sebastian404, on Mar 10 2011, 10:39, said:

The Blade uses a different touch screen to the racer..

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MSM

vs

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_SYNAPTICS_I2C_RMI
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_CYPRESS_I2C_RMI

(the blade has at least two different hardware versions, so the kernel has to include both)
As for the Camera, there seems to be another (slight difference)

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_SOCKET

vs

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_FPC

The blade seem to have the same camera hardware, but interfaced differently....

There are other differences, I should be able to build a Blade Kernel using the hardware options from the Racer...  I'll see if that makes any difference...

so the camera for the racer is unix socket based but the blade goes through a specified  port way ?? i think im right lol

Edited by Ang3l0912, 10 March 2011 - 10:44 AM.

[shuaidi]

Sebastian404, on Mar 10 2011, 18:39, said:

The Blade uses a different touch screen to the racer..

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MSM

vs

CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_SYNAPTICS_I2C_RMI
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_CYPRESS_I2C_RMI

(the blade has at least two different hardware versions, so the kernel has to include both)
As for the Camera, there seems to be another (slight difference)

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_SOCKET

vs

CONFIG_MT9T11X_QTECH_MCNEX_FPC

The blade seem to have the same camera hardware, but interfaced differently....

There are other differences, I should be able to build a Blade Kernel using the hardware options from the Racer...  I'll see if that makes any difference...

Yes, you are right. The kernel I complied could drive blade's system including the touch screen. I adjust the screen range of the code, so the touch screen works. But touch screen is not accurate. The code of the camer is wrong, but wifi is right. so wifi can be fixed by replacing files of system, But camera can not.

[Vlatko25]

shuaidi, on Mar 11 2011, 03:48, said:

Yes, you are right. The kernel I complied could drive blade's system including the touch screen. I adjust the screen range of the code, so the touch screen works. But touch screen is not accurate. The code of the camer is wrong, but wifi is right. so wifi can be fixed by replacing files of system, But camera can not.

thats cool,when it is going to be ready   nice work shuaidi    

[Ang3l0912]

This Is For Rexchun to report bugs on the 2.3 ROM

[Lam1Q]

Ang3l0912, on Mar 14 2011, 18:36, said:

This Is For Rexchun to report bugs on the 2.3 ROM

The some bug of unlock resolution.(like CM only)
And red/green button
Radio doesnt work:)

Edited by Lam1Q, 14 March 2011 - 12:57 PM.

[rexchun]

Lam1Q, on Mar 14 2011, 12:50, said:

The some bug of unlock resolution.(like CM only)
And red/green button
Radio doesnt work:)

radio ,do you mean no signal?or the radio app