Benchmark result

[Guest siggey]

This are the result of my liquid A1 with 256 Mb swap clocked 921 Mhz on liquidnext 1.7.2 rom with kaerry's v6 supercharged scripts settings (the settings are from kaerry, the scripts are made by zeppenlinrox....):

Nenamark1 : 15.7 fps

SmartBench2011 : productivity 1151, gaming 846

Linpack single thread : 33.941 MFLOPS

HexEngineBenchmark : 34.69 fps

I hope you all post your results, so we can compare different rom and settings performance.

Note: all the benchmarks suite I used come free from market.

Edited August 28, 2011 by siggey

[Guest zorginho]

liquid a1 cm 6.1.1 gnufabio, v6 supercharger setting 2, cpu 921 lagfree, more than 120 apps installed.

Nenamark1 : best run 19,5

SmartBench2011 : productivity 1051, gaming 695

Linpack single thread : 18.9 MFLOPS

Neocore: 31.3 fps

it's incredible how a rom can change all the benchmark results.

[Guest siggey]

it's incredible how a rom can change all the benchmark results.

That's the target...

[Guest treyguitar]

Liquid E Liquidnext 1.7.2, Cpu 921mhz interactive

Nenamark1 : 19,9

SmartBench2011 : productivity 926, gaming 792

Linpack single thread : 33.11 MFLOPS

Neocore: 31.2 fps

[Guest Ma7moud]

overclocked to 921 mHz on MIUI 1.8.12 by Lens_Flare

Nenamark1 : 20.4 fps

Smartbench 2011 : Productivity 767 , Games 833

Linpack : 28.217 MFLOPS

HexEngine didn't work

Neocore 24.5 fps

the numbers don't look so good but other than the few minutes after the phone boots up it feels fluid and no lags unless you run many apps due to the low ram of the A1

[Guest MCAlex]

But we should have the same HW.

I mean, who makes a benchmark with 256MB swap with a Class8 SD-Card will have a different benchmark from who has 256MB swap on a Cl.6 Sd-Card and from who has not a swap.

Also there are others things which can make a comparison different.

I think we can't make a real comparing benchmark if we have different HW. :)

[Guest xdxdxdxdxdx]

i think miui2 had limit fps.we couldnot see the fps has over 30。

i had test many game on 2.3 or 2.2。liquid with 2.3 better than 2.2

[Guest xdxdxdxdxdx]

i think miui2.3 had limit fps.we couldnot see the fps has over 30。

i had test many game on 2.3 or 2.2。liquid with 2.3 better than 2.2

Edited August 30, 2011 by xdxdxdxdxdx

[Guest MCAlex]

i think miui2 had limit fps.we couldnot see the fps has over 30。

i had test many game on 2.3 or 2.2。liquid with 2.3 better than 2.2

miui2?

Btw obviously a game on GB works better than a game on F. They have different kernel.

[Guest siggey]

But we should have the same HW.

I mean, who makes a benchmark with 256MB swap with a Class8 SD-Card will have a different benchmark from who has 256MB swap on a Cl.6 Sd-Card and from who has not a swap.

Also there are others things which can make a comparison different.

I think we can't make a real comparing benchmark if we have different HW. :)

Oh yeah really big hardware difference between my liquid and your... my had an esacore processor and a quad sli..... wtf.... the result in first post are from my a1 with swap on a class 4 card... and the score is good.. Ginger is faster than froyo... but miui vs liquidnext? So, gimme some benchmarks

Edited August 31, 2011 by siggey

[Guest Wawa63]

Hello, with smartbench 2011 I got 1249/849.

I have an Acer liquid A1 on MIUI 1.8.26 from Lens Flare, with no swap, oc @ 960Mhz with performance governor. ;)

[Guest fana.fanisa]

my toy run on 2.3 liquidnext 1.8, OC @ 960mhz n gvnor to prformance...

smartbench results 931/883