240 replies to this topic

[plegdroid]

Rahulj85, on 06 January 2012 - 07:10 AM, said:

oh ok..that makes sense..maybe we will simply have to adjust to the touch response now..i am getting use to the lovely soft touch experience, but still thought to bring this up once..thanks anyways..:-)

it's really tender, think we've been used to having to really nail the screen to input anything, but this is way better and more akin to how it should feel, feels like a high end phone now.

[SoftStoner]

vamshistunner, on 06 January 2012 - 08:45 AM, said:

The reason i am back of 2.6.35 is that it has got all the drivers working for racer except wifi . But its working fine. The main problem for our racer is there are no new proprietary libs which supports newer kernels..

Bummer. Well, it will still be better than 2.6.32.9, though... I'd love to take a look at your .config, maybe something could be optimised (it's a single CPU, so disabling all SMP cruft and enabling CONFIG_TINY_RCU would be a performance win, and I don't know if cgroups are used for anything in Android). Also, have you tried enabling zram/compcache? It didn't work last time I tried (I know it does work on the ZTE Blade, with Linux 2.6.35.7).

[miki994]

hey vamshi how is the work going with 2.6.35

[vamshistunner]

SoftStoner, on 06 January 2012 - 10:24 AM, said:

Bummer. Well, it will still be better than 2.6.32.9, though... I'd love to take a look at your .config, maybe something could be optimised (it's a single CPU, so disabling all SMP cruft and enabling CONFIG_TINY_RCU would be a performance win, and I don't know if cgroups are used for anything in Android). Also, have you tried enabling zram/compcache? It didn't work last time I tried (I know it does work on the ZTE Blade, with Linux 2.6.35.7).

If you have my kernel#38 pull from it. Tiny rcu, zram can be put in .35.

[vamshistunner]

miki994, on 06 January 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:

hey vamshi how is the work going with 2.6.35

I'll post the updates if there is any.

[Kylexx]

Vamshi, first thanks for the kernel.

But I'm having problems with keys  Home - Menu - Return , work with difficulties, sometimes you have to press several times to work.

I tested with the roms racerboy # 257v2, # 257, #251 and #248 and the problem persists.

Edited by Kylexx, 07 January 2012 - 04:25 AM.

[thadog2010]

can some1 give me link to kernal

[plegdroid]

thadog2010, on 07 January 2012 - 09:16 AM, said:

can some1 give me link to kernal

it's@ post #1

[vamshistunner]

Kylexx, on 07 January 2012 - 04:21 AM, said:

Vamshi, first thanks for the kernel.

But I'm having problems with keys  Home - Menu - Return , work with difficulties, sometimes you have to press several times to work.

I tested with the roms racerboy # 257v2, # 257, #251 and #248 and the problem persists.

Just press on the name/symbols or bit above it not too near to screen. It is working fine.

[Racerboy]

@Kylexx   i assume your using the #68 version of kernel on 1st post of this thread? touch_to_key is present in my roms, which give the haptic feedback and home.menu,back functions.........if your still having problems try a full clean wipe and install the rom again then the kernel #68

[shubkin]

hi! and can make the kernel under gen2?

Edited by shubkin, 07 January 2012 - 03:49 PM.

[vamshistunner]

shubkin, on 07 January 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:

hi! and can make the kernel under gen2?

If there are more no.of users who need it for Gen2, then i can look at it.
I am not aware of base address for gen2. So let me know about it.

Edited by vamshistunner, 07 January 2012 - 06:05 PM.

[equiliym]

ok im just cursed, whatever kernel i use on my custom roms screenshot doesnt work xD but i can say i tried your kernel and im basing my new rom for serbian community on it, works like a charm

[SoftStoner]

equiliym, on 10 January 2012 - 10:13 AM, said:

ok im just cursed, whatever kernel i use on my custom roms screenshot doesnt work xD but i can say i tried your kernel and im basing my new rom for serbian community on it, works like a charm

Well, mostly... Not being able to fully disable haptic feedback is a pet-peeve of mine... Not a killer, though.

[equiliym]

SoftStoner, on 10 January 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

Well, mostly... Not being able to fully disable haptic feedback is a pet-peeve of mine... Not a killer, though.

well, thats not really a kernel issue afaik, kernel uses touch_to_key for softkeys and that binary is compiled with enabled haptic.. and we dont have source of it lol, i think rexchun made that

[plegdroid]

SoftStoner, on 10 January 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

Well, mostly... Not being able to fully disable haptic feedback is a pet-peeve of mine... Not a killer, though.

will removing the sh file disable haptic?

[SoftStoner]

plegdroid, on 10 January 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:

will removing the sh file disable haptic?

What script are you refering to?

[plegdroid]

SoftStoner, on 10 January 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

What script are you refering to?

system/ bin

[SoftStoner]

plegdroid, on 10 January 2012 - 12:24 PM, said:

system/ bin

The only scripts I have in /system/bin are backuptool.sh, modelid_cfg.sh and verify_cache_partition_size.sh. I'm inclined to believe this is a kernel issue.

[plegdroid]

SoftStoner, on 10 January 2012 - 12:34 PM, said:

The only scripts I have in /system/bin are backuptool.sh, modelid_cfg.sh and verify_cache_partition_size.sh. I'm inclined to believe this is a kernel issue.

are you on deadlink kernel per chance?