Jelly bean for SD
Started by
boristhespie
, Sep 13 2012 11:35 AM
#1
Posted 13 September 2012 - 11:35 AM
#2
Posted 13 September 2012 - 08:28 PM
Great news, now all we need is for the rom to leak. Preferably before we all get bored of the OSD and move on.
#3
Posted 24 September 2012 - 06:49 PM
So... what are the chances of it? And is the xolo running it? - heard rummors
#4
Posted 25 September 2012 - 08:18 AM
#5
Posted 25 September 2012 - 06:57 PM
Someone said on a thread that xolo is running it!?
#6
Posted 25 September 2012 - 07:09 PM
Can you show us the thread? A website address maybe?
#7
Posted 25 September 2012 - 08:42 PM
Ribs85, on 25 September 2012 - 07:09 PM, said:
Can you show us the thread? A website address maybe?
Hmm, there is a mention of it on the Xolo twitter account :-
XOLO
Hey
however this was posted on the 2nd Aug...
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
Matthew 23:12
Matthew 23:12
#8
Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:26 PM
Hilarious as it is that dec1153 has been banned. I do wish to talk about this thread some more now that we have ICS...
Is there any news on Jelly Bean at all? Everything seems to have gone quiet on that front.
Is there any news on Jelly Bean at all? Everything seems to have gone quiet on that front.
Edited by Ribs85, 21 October 2012 - 03:26 PM.
#9
Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:40 PM
Ribs85, on 21 October 2012 - 03:26 PM, said:
Hilarious as it is that dec1153 has been banned. I do wish to talk about this thread some more now that we have ICS...
Is there any news on Jelly Bean at all? Everything seems to have gone quiet on that front.
Is there any news on Jelly Bean at all? Everything seems to have gone quiet on that front.
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
Matthew 23:12
Matthew 23:12
#10
Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:56 PM
BlueMoonRising, on 21 October 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:
How do you manage to get banned from a site such as this?
1. Start 15 new threads in one evening, all of them saying nothing what-so-ever (one of his thread titles was "Home", and the text "sweet home", and that's it)
2. Constant bullshitting the whole time, saying dumb things like Jelly Bean being "confirmed" without citing any sources.
Load up his profile, he's in the "banned" group...
#11
Posted 21 October 2012 - 05:10 PM
Ah, of course, the strange lad. I'd forgotten him.
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
Matthew 23:12
Matthew 23:12
#12
Posted 21 October 2012 - 06:51 PM
This is old news and leaks won't help as they are signed with engineering keys so they won't install or boot on our phones. Believe me we tried when we found ICS ROMs in the past.
#13
Posted 21 October 2012 - 07:55 PM
Indeed. But what about a 'proper' update from Orange / Xolo? Any word?
#14
Posted 21 October 2012 - 08:36 PM
I haven't heard anything but I expect to see an update from Xolo first. Intel ported JB not long after the source was made available and I did read somewhere that they have updated to 4.1.1 - possibly even 4.1.2 now since the changes are minimal. Because Intel push a lot of it's own code upstream this has the benefit that the Android on our devices is basically AOSP (Android Open Source Platform). In theory if we had fully unlocked devices we could download and build the entire OS from source. Infact, Motorola have published all it's changes for the RAZRi as it's slightly different from the reference platform and these changes are made to be pasted over a download of ICS 4.0.4 from AOSP.
So yes to Jelly Bean. Who knows about anything else (4.2, 5.0 etc). depends on Intel.
BTW for those interested.. the kernel on our phones is almost stock code. Which is nice if we ever got the ability to unlock the bootloader to allow us to use our own kernels.
So yes to Jelly Bean. Who knows about anything else (4.2, 5.0 etc). depends on Intel.
BTW for those interested.. the kernel on our phones is almost stock code. Which is nice if we ever got the ability to unlock the bootloader to allow us to use our own kernels.
#15
Posted 21 October 2012 - 09:12 PM
flibblesan, on 21 October 2012 - 06:51 PM, said:
This is old news and leaks won't help as they are signed with engineering keys so they won't install or boot on our phones. Believe me we tried when we found ICS ROMs in the past.
question, are the ics and gb roms all signed with the same key, could it be cross referenced?
#16
Posted 21 October 2012 - 09:25 PM
The razr i processor is the same as ours - an az210 but at 2GHz? Why isn't ours like this at stock?
#17
Posted 21 October 2012 - 10:39 PM
#18
Posted 22 October 2012 - 06:24 AM
Yeah and on gsmarena our phone uses a z2460
#19
Posted 22 October 2012 - 07:58 AM
flibblesan, on 21 October 2012 - 08:36 PM, said:
I haven't heard anything but I expect to see an update from Xolo first. Intel ported JB not long after the source was made available and I did read somewhere that they have updated to 4.1.1 - possibly even 4.1.2 now since the changes are minimal. Because Intel push a lot of it's own code upstream this has the benefit that the Android on our devices is basically AOSP (Android Open Source Platform). In theory if we had fully unlocked devices we could download and build the entire OS from source. Infact, Motorola have published all it's changes for the RAZRi as it's slightly different from the reference platform and these changes are made to be pasted over a download of ICS 4.0.4 from AOSP.
So yes to Jelly Bean. Who knows about anything else (4.2, 5.0 etc). depends on Intel.
BTW for those interested.. the kernel on our phones is almost stock code. Which is nice if we ever got the ability to unlock the bootloader to allow us to use our own kernels.
So yes to Jelly Bean. Who knows about anything else (4.2, 5.0 etc). depends on Intel.
BTW for those interested.. the kernel on our phones is almost stock code. Which is nice if we ever got the ability to unlock the bootloader to allow us to use our own kernels.
Isn't it contradicting coming from intel to not be willing to unlock the bootloader and yet having a public repo of there sources for that device. There could just have pass them to xolo and orange internally. what's the point of that?
Second thing, when the phone came out I know paul had an official statment from orange to about bootloaders. Did intel did the same thing? I wasn't arround at that time.
Android folder music player for holo lovers :https://play.google....=fr.ayziaa.App2
#20
Posted 22 October 2012 - 01:46 PM
ayziaa, on 22 October 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:
Isn't it contradicting coming from intel to not be willing to unlock the bootloader and yet having a public repo of there sources for that device. There could just have pass them to xolo and orange internally. what's the point of that?
Second thing, when the phone came out I know paul had an official statment from orange to about bootloaders. Did intel did the same thing? I wasn't arround at that time.
Intel are usually pretty good with the whole openness thing. But they understand the market; carriers want locked bootloaders.
On the subject of the source: i do believe Android is gpl? (could be wrong here... The kernel is gpl at least) So they have little option but to release the source.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









