Jump to content


Photo

Moto G -Worth the upgrade?

- - - - -

23 replies to this topic

#1
Thedarkphonetech

Thedarkphonetech

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Devices:Orange San Diego
So the recently moto g has recently been realesed to the budget market. It feautures a snapdragon 400 quad core cpu clocked at 1.2ghz,1gb ram,720p screen with a ppi of 321,5mp with 720p recording and android 4.3. So how does this compare to our beloved san diego?
Well in terma of cpu, I think we have a win- our intel processor proves to be very snappy as benchmarks and real life performance shows. Both have 1gb of ram - so a draw. The san diego has an 8mp with dual flash and 1080p at the rear and 1.3mp with 720p. This definately beats the moto g on paper,however I don't have any sample pictures with me. The moto g has a better screwn, with nicer colours and is that bit sharper with the extra ppi. Design and build wise, the moto g again wins with removable coloured backs and curved design. Software wise the moto g runs 4.3 out of the box with a promised 4.4 update in January with virtually no bloat ware. However our sandiego is crammed with lots of bloatware and runs an outdated 4.0.4. Also the san diego is completely locked down both in network and bootloader. Although root is present nothing else can devolpe. The moto g already has lots of devlopment. The san diego wins for connectively with an hdmi port and dedicated camera button. The speakers are also better than the moto g (dual speakers). Is it worth the £150 NO!!!!:lol:

  • 0

#2
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

Just a few points.

 

1. I find it hard to believe anyone can tell the difference between 321 PPI and 297 PPI on a 4 (or so) inch screen.

2. I didn't think there was that much bloatware on the OSD, but as soon as you're rooted it's all gone anyway.

3. Once out of the minimum term it's not network locked. Admittedly you do have to wait and it can be problematic to unlock to say the least.

 

As to whether it's worth it if you already have an OSD is a personal question and everybody would have their own take on that.

If you are looking to buy one Tescos are selling the 16GB version for £129 I think but of course that is network locked.


Edited by BlueMoonRising, 23 November 2013 - 09:54 AM.

  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#3
Thedarkphonetech

Thedarkphonetech

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Devices:Orange San Diego
I agree, but there is a considerable amount of bloatware which many users would not enjoy...

  • 0

#4
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

I forgot to mention that if you root then of course you can slap a 64GB MicroSD card in the OSD which for me personally is the clincher.


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#5
spike68

spike68

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 12 posts

I forgot to mention that if you root then of course you can slap a 64GB MicroSD card in the OSD which for me personally is the clincher.

The moto G leaves it for dead. Camera is only thing on the phone that can by frowned upon but the camera app is customized. Great pics. Blazing fast with 50gb Google drive + 8gb on board. Graphics/display shame the s4, confirmed by friends with s4's. Much longer battery life. Don't compare to this phone, get nexus 4 OE better.
99£ on any network from phones for you but use a friends payg orange sim. Loving it.

Attached Files


  • 0

#6
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

The moto G leaves it for dead. Camera is only thing on the phone that can by frowned upon but the camera app is customized. Great pics. Blazing fast with 50gb Google drive + 8gb on board. Graphics/display shame the s4, confirmed by friends with s4's. Much longer battery life. Don't compare to this phone, get nexus 4 OE better.
99£ on any network from phones for you but use a friends payg orange sim. Loving it.

Remind me where the MicroSD slot is since I use it as my MP3 player?

 

;)


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#7
Ced_Gee

Ced_Gee

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 29 posts

I'm moving over to a Moto G as soon as Tesco get some more 16GB's back in stock.  

 

The San Diego has been ok but the build quality (mine has more cracks than a crack house) and the battery life (screen just saps power) are major bugbears.  The lack of support and updates are annoying and as I'm leaving EE I don't fancy giving them another £15 just to unlock it.

 

It's a shame really as it had the potential to be an outstanding phone but the execution and the unwillingness to unlock the bootloader was deeply flawed.  A bit of a disappointment compared to the original San Francisco, which has been kept alive by a healthy development scene.

 

Needless to say I wont be buying another 'Orange' phone again...


  • 0

#8
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

I'm moving over to a Moto G as soon as Tesco get some more 16GB's back in stock.  

 

The San Diego has been ok but the build quality (mine has more cracks than a crack house) and the battery life (screen just saps power) are major bugbears.  The lack of support and updates are annoying and as I'm leaving EE I don't fancy giving them another £15 just to unlock it.

 

It's a shame really as it had the potential to be an outstanding phone but the execution and the unwillingness to unlock the bootloader was deeply flawed.  A bit of a disappointment compared to the original San Francisco, which has been kept alive by a healthy development scene.

 

Needless to say I wont be buying another 'Orange' phone again...

Pretty much agree with all of that including not buying an 'Orange' phone again.

 

Just two things, it's £20 to unlock (even worse I know) unless it's changed and the battery life I've always found to be fine. Any high resolution screen is going to suck power, it's just the nature of the beast.


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#9
Ced_Gee

Ced_Gee

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 29 posts

^^^

Yeah, I agree with the screen thing.  Motorola seem to have cracked the battery issue though, which is one of the main reasons I'm moving over.


Edited by Ced_Gee, 24 November 2013 - 04:28 PM.

  • 0

#10
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

Slightly off topic but if anyone is looking to upgrade then Giffgaff have some interesting phone deals where you can pay for the handset over your choice of length of time and pay for the sim separately.

All the phones are even unlocked.

 

http://giffgaff.com/phones

 

 

 

Edit :- I only became aware of this today so apologies if you already knew, no idea how long they've been doing this.


Edited by BlueMoonRising, 25 November 2013 - 08:27 PM.

  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#11
Thedarkphonetech

Thedarkphonetech

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Devices:Orange San Diego
£20 to unlock actually!

  • 0

#12
gwebb

gwebb

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Devices:Nexus S, Nexus 7, OSD, Moto G

I've got both.

 

The San Diego should have been a great phone, it's ridiculous that Intel ported 4.2 to Medfield but none of the OEMs took them up on it, especially when the phones are essentially the FFRD manufactured by Gigabyte. The hardware is quite capable, but being locked down tight and stuck on 4.0.4 has sucked. Intel's first shot at mobile went down in flames, even the RAZR i and Lenovo K900 (?) seem to have stalled.

 

I'll never buy another Orange phone ever again, or indeed any third-party branded phone like Vodafone's Smart range, you are at the liberty of companies that simply do not care. Updates are a big enough problem as it is without letting operators even more in on the act than normal.

 

All in all it was a mistake to buy one, I'm just glad I only paid ~£80 or so.

 

 

As to the Moto G things are looking much brighter.

 

The good:

 

1. It's fast, certainly faster than you'd expect. No it's not going to win benchmarks but in use it feels good. I'm really very pleased with the performance.

 

2. Build quality is excellent for a cheap phone. There are no rattles or squeaks or flimsy parts on my phone at least. It looks good too.

 

3. The screen is very nice too. I don't think you can get a better screen for this price.

 

4. Software. Essentially completely stock. SIM unlocked from Phones 4U. Unlock-able, apparently, from Motorola. And 4.4 promised for January. This is how it should be done. Short of a Nexus, or Google Play Edition, it's as good as it gets.

 

5. It's cheap too, just over that £100 sweet spot. When you look at other Android phones around that price it's a hell of a good deal.

 

The bad:

 

1. The camera is a bit crap. If you really care about this, I don't, then look elsewhere.

 

2. No SD. I don't care about this either.

 

So for me personally there are no downsides to the Moto G. It does everything I want at a reasonable price. I've already half made up my mind to buy its successor. :)


  • 0

#13
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

I knew nothing about the Moto G until this thread came up but from a quick Google it looks really good especially for the price.

Tesco's seem to have them back in stock (just checked now) @ £99 for the 8GB and £129 for the 16GB one.

If you want to unlock then just £2.04 from a link on XDA is as cheap as you can get (short of free :)http://forum.xda-dev....php?p=47746445

 

In relation to the GiffGaff deals I mentioned above the moneysavingexpert website has a handy comparison table for handsets :- http://www.moneysavi...s&utm_content=5

 

 

 

Edit :- Tesco's also include them in their Club Card Boost scheme so if you've got enough you can half that online price.


Edited by BlueMoonRising, 27 November 2013 - 09:16 AM.

  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#14
MrPuddington

MrPuddington

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 278 posts
  • Devices:Android

Just a few points.

 

1. I find it hard to believe anyone can tell the difference between 321 PPI and 297 PPI on a 4 (or so) inch screen.

2. I didn't think there was that much bloatware on the OSD, but as soon as you're rooted it's all gone anyway.

3. Once out of the minimum term it's not network locked. Admittedly you do have to wait and it can be problematic to unlock to say the least.

 

 

I have done it, and I have to say it is worth it. The Moto G is the first phone that I can happy just use. I do not have the feeling that I have to tweak the software, because it just works. Android really has come along nicely since 4.0.

 

On the hardware side, there are pros and cons. The display is larger and has a higher resolution. You can see the higher resolution if you look very closely, but I doubt it is in any way relevant. The bigger size does make a difference. The Moto G is also slightly thicker, but it is curved and nice to hold. The CPU is more powerful, but has less single thread performance. Importantly it is an ARMv7, which means the phone has excellent compatibility with all apps (but I think no flash player?). The audio output and the speaker is not quite as good, and it has only one microphone (no noise cancellation). The camera has a lower resolution, but makes better pictures. The wifi signal is a bit stronger, I think. The build quality is much better. The battery lasts a lot longer. 

 

So the hardware is nearly on par (except for the display), and most of the difference is in the software. Don't forget that the Moto G has unified storage, which means 5 GB for apps. On the San Diego I easily run out of app space.  


  • 0

#15
MrPuddington

MrPuddington

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 278 posts
  • Devices:Android

The San Diego should have been a great phone, it's ridiculous that Intel ported 4.2 to Medfield but none of the OEMs took them up on it, especially when the phones are essentially the FFRD manufactured by Gigabyte. The hardware is quite capable, but being locked down tight and stuck on 4.0.4 has sucked. Intel's first shot at mobile went down in flames, even the RAZR i and Lenovo K900 (?) seem to have stalled.

This.

 

Intel made a great phone, and they turned it into a great hardware platform that easily outperforms ARM. But they failed to deliver the software to go with it. Now they have a bad reputation, and are only being used in cheap budget stuff like the Galaxy Tab 3. They blew it big time, they have turned evil (why do they still keep the boot loader locked even after they stopped selling it?) and they have only themselves to blame. 


  • 0

#16
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

I have done it, and I have to say it is worth it. The Moto G is the first phone that I can happy just use. I do not have the feeling that I have to tweak the software, because it just works. Android really has come along nicely since 4.0.

 

On the hardware side, there are pros and cons. The display is larger and has a higher resolution. You can see the higher resolution if you look very closely, but I doubt it is in any way relevant. The bigger size does make a difference. The Moto G is also slightly thicker, but it is curved and nice to hold. The CPU is more powerful, but has less single thread performance. Importantly it is an ARMv7, which means the phone has excellent compatibility with all apps (but I think no flash player?). The audio output and the speaker is not quite as good, and it has only one microphone (no noise cancellation). The camera has a lower resolution, but makes better pictures. The wifi signal is a bit stronger, I think. The build quality is much better. The battery lasts a lot longer. 

 

So the hardware is nearly on par (except for the display), and most of the difference is in the software. Don't forget that the Moto G has unified storage, which means 5 GB for apps. On the San Diego I easily run out of app space.  

I never doubted it's a good phone (amazing for the price) although with no SD card slot it's not for me. The fact that the build quality is better should come as no surprise to anyone who's bought an OSD :(

As far as the screen resolution goes perhaps I should have pointed out that I'm in my 50s with fading eye sight so I'll pass on that ;)


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#17
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

The Moto G is also now already rootable :-  http://www.modaco.co...available-r1269

 

 

I think I hate this phone :(


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#18
Thedarkphonetech

Thedarkphonetech

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Devices:Orange San Diego
Shud I get it or shud I wait?

  • 0

#19
BlueMoonRising

BlueMoonRising

    Hardcore

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, there and everywhere...
  • Devices:Orange San Diego, OSF

Shud I get it or shud I wait?

Yes, maybe. It's rather up to you I'm afraid.


  • 0
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

#20
Thedarkphonetech

Thedarkphonetech

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Devices:Orange San Diego
I really have been considering the xperia sp. Its £164 at EE. Is it any good?

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users