Jump to content

Is E200s cam better than Nokias 6600


Guest v_patel1

Recommended Posts

Guest Simon Desser
VGA F2.8 SPV E200 Camera

VGA F3.5 1:2:8 Nokia 6600 Camera

Which one is better?

The only real way to say is to try them both :wink:

"On paper", they're both the same spec:- Both VGA ie 640 x 480 pixels.

You've said the 6600 is F3.5, but it's not, it's 1:2.8, which is another way of saying F2.8 (same as the E200) This indicates the aperture of the lens, or how much light it lets in.

What 3.5 relates to (no F in there) is the "angle of view" A standard SLR camera's view is 50mm (or 45mm in the old days) But standard focal length or angle of view, varies according to the film size, or in digital terms, the size of the chip.

I don't know the focal length of the E200's camera, but chances are it's the same or very similar to the Nokia's.

So in theory, on paper, they're the same :)

(Sorry if I got carried away with the technical stuff)

6600 Cam.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sackgesicht

Hi,

we made a lot of pics in the past with Nokia 3650 >f=2,8 and SPV Tanager (f=?) The pic quality was always better at SPV - believe us. The only thing was the slow serial connection - you have a bad preview at the screen.

But for the new E200: cam is build in, comfort like Nokia and others and the quality will be better, again.

Greets

Sackgesicht

For expl: Nokia 7650 has only f=3.5 and the light sensity is not so high...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.