Guest Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 @pbr111: which ROM do you use? And what "tweaks" did you possibly apply? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fonz93 Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) It has an g510 (1209 mhz frequency), it is more or less as 7500 on our Y300.. not so much When your scores dropped from 1000 to 700 ... did you use during those runs? If not try to "enable" it and see if something changes. The only thing disabled was frandom in today's build, the rest was the same (overcommit, min_free etc..) Edited July 22, 2014 by fonz93 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 Try to enable it and see if something changes. You can do it with a console command: start frandom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) moddingg, You can compress the kernel with LZ4 and enable unaligned memory access for faster boot? I've found the issue why the kernel refused to boot being compressed with LZ4: we had no support for unaligned access in the decompressor module --> ARM: 7583/1: decompressor: Enable unaligned memory access for v6 and … Here is an TEST-BUILD with an LZ4 compressed kernel (both: zImage + ramdisk): http://www19.zippyshare.com/v/80789091/file.html Changes: switched from GCC's -O2 to -Os (optimized for size) temporary removed all custom GCC flags (to further shrink kernel's size) patched ARM's dma.c kernel module (seems to increase random read/write a little) add/removed some kernel commits But as previously said and like expected: the boot-time didn't really decrease noticeable, because our memory bandwidth is too low. Edited July 22, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vule991 Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) Zram + KSM is far more efficient, swap decreases performance and creates lag. Your kernel and CM 10.1 is the best match so far. I hope that soon a new test version. Thanks Ole, great! Hehehe :ph34r: Edited July 22, 2014 by Vule991 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jor1196 Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 moddingg33k want to try your latest test kernel with no tweaks B199? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 I fear I'm unable to understand your question :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Domino2115 Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 (edited) With lastest version my phone fly, with enabled zram multitasking improved a lot, phone runs smoothly, no problems so far, it just laggs abit when you pull down notificatons you know, thanks Edited July 23, 2014 by Domino2115 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 You know that it's only supposed to be a test build so far? I've only uploaded it for anyone who wants to test the booting of an LZ4 compressed kernel image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 (edited) Yet another TEST-BUILD: http://www24.zippyshare.com/v/10826854/file.html ( Update -> http://www26.zippyshare.com/v/41036313/file.html ) switched to linux's OnDemand (imported from kernel 3.7) applied some frequency calculation commits for OnDemand taken from higher kernel levels (including the brand new changes from 3.17 -> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTc0NzA) tryed to further restore performance by cleaning up some commits OnDemand is from now on supposed to be more battery friendly. It also scales better through all available frequency ranges. Following commits have been applied: cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency cpufreq: Introduce new relation for freq selection Introduce CPUFREQ_… cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the dead band effect in low load Unless I'm fully satisfied with the build it will stay an "test-build" only, sry I'd still appreciate about feedback meanwhile. Edited July 24, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 (edited) Due of the changed frequency algorithm it might be possible that benchmark scores dropped a little, because OnDemand doesn't fire @ full power all the time anymore. If it helps to extend battery life and if everything else is still working fluid and without any issues this shouldn't be a big deal imho. For pure benchmarking you might wanna consider using another governor like Interactive. Edited July 23, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Romagnolo1973 Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 Testing, but at the moment I can only confirm is booting and working, because I'm charging the phone. Tomorrow I can give a better feedback Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Romagnolo1973 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) Ok, test report after somo hour of heavy use: Boot is faster and is not a placebo effect, well is not flash gordon, but for our poor hardware now it boot noticeable faster My set is OnDemand and Sio and for me your ondemand revisited is really perfect, seems battery friend and everithing working with no lag I have set 122 mhz as minimal and mp3 works perfectly, i can even play with other backgroud apps and the suond is perfect, no glitch or others problems ( i use gonemad player but i think is the same with others players) 61mhz is not used in any app i have tested today For me is perfect, awesome kernel !!! Just a curiosity: now if my Y300 if is power off, it wakeup 1 minute before alarm will ring, as was in original huawei rom. I'm not used to stay with device off but i'm sure with old fusionx+cexstel kernel this was not happening, my device still stay power off I don't know if is a kernel feature you add or is a AOSP rom addiction. Thanks for all your great work Imho you can pass this version from beta to stable download because is really a great kernel for our device Edited July 24, 2014 by Romagnolo1973 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 This wakeup feature needs kernel (and ROM) support. I think Cexstel's kernel might support is as well, but I'd have to look it up to be sure. The latest build is using GZIP kernel compression again :D :P Thx for your detailed report. The new refined OnDemand is not perfect, yet. Maybe I will implement a modified CodeAurora-Version as well in the next build for comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Romagnolo1973 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 To tell the true I power off my device 1 time a week so could be a placebo effect :-) but compared with 17/07 kernel seems really better in boot, or could be avax instead of nova as default laucher, that the only modification I made (and i suggest to made because reduce ram usage). Another curiosity compared to cexstel, using performance control there is a fast battery charger option that you r sinopsys don't have. I don't know what is exactly and i never activate it because I think is another placebo feature or can damage the battery, what it is if you know? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SH3H1 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 "Can't connect to the camera".....anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fonz93 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 "Can't connect to the camera".....anyone? Which ROM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SH3H1 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 Which ROM? AOSP MOD ...,Nevermind a reboot fixed the issue :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SH3H1 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 Which ROM? AOSP MOD ...,Nevermind a reboot fixed the issue :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thetonyxx Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 I/O score whit antutu is poor... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 I/O score whit antutu is poor... Test it again with some other governor like: Interactive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thetonyxx Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 Test it again with some other governor like: Interactive now is 600/510 but whit kernel of AOSP old version (juny 2014) is 610/600 and total score is around 7900 points, now 7500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Domino2115 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 now is 600/510 but whit kernel of AOSP old version (juny 2014) is 610/600 and total score is around 7900 points, now 7500 Its not everything about antutu score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 The truth is: if you compile the provided source code by Huawei without touching anything, the kernel will most likely always score worse on benchmarks than any stock kernel. That's an observation I made long time ago. Stock kernels from Huawei are compiled with some different source code, which is being kept company internal an never got released to public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vule991 Posted July 24, 2014 Report Share Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) Its not everything about antutu score Antutu score is lowered to the latest versions aplication on our devices about 400-500. Especially in the sections: multitask, runtime, 2D and 3D. Kernel is perfect. Edited July 24, 2014 by Vule991 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now