Jump to content
  • Sign in to follow this  

    Samsung Galaxy Note 7 alternatives. What is out there?


    With the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 truly finished, what other devices are out there to replace this device? First of all let's look at what made Galaxy Note 7 great - it had a great camera, screen, performance, build and battery life. 

    Our choices for these alternatives are based in the following categories, Camera, Screen, Performance, Build and Battery. We didn't just look at the latest Android options but also the best option that Apple has to offer. The alternative phones picked were the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Google Pixel XL and the Apple iPhone 7 Plus. 


    We rounded up these devices because you can buy them now. Also these are the closest devices to the Galaxy Note 7 we can find, that tick almost all the features the Galaxy Note 7 packed, be its size and features. We understand that some of these devices have different size options, whenever this occurs we have chosen the larger device, because that is the one closest to the Galaxy Note 7, Phablet size.


    One of the greatest things about the Galaxy Note 7 was the camera. It was the same camera found in the previous Samsung flagship Galaxy S7/ S7 Edge, which interestingly is one of the reasons the phone is in our list.

    The Galaxy Note 7 came packed with a 12MP F1.7 aperture sensor with OIS, making this an ideal point and shoot - like the device before it packing the same sensor - for low light photography and quick pictures. Using the double press on the home button to open the camera app, it made capturing the moment easy and quick, and in the majority of situations it took great pictures and videos. All three phones are packing a 12MP sensor with an aperture of F1.7-2.0, however each has brought something different to the table. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge packs the same sensor as the Galaxy Note 7, so you can expect the same performance from it.

    The Google Pixel XL on the other hand is packing a smaller aperture at F2.0 and no OIS, however because it uses a bigger sensor than any other device in the list at 1.55µm pixel size and with Google's engineering know how they have done an amazing job to address those shortcomings - utilising the Gyro sensors in the device and with software magic* - they are able to mostly mitigate the need for OIS. For early impressions of this device have a look at Paul's article.

    The Apple iPhone 7 Plus this year brings a dual 12MP F1.8 - F2.8 camera setup - one wide lens and another zoom lens, allowing for 2x optical zoom - offering OIS on the wider lens,  ensuring that every picture you take is blur free. The camera app has been improved to allow for zoom and a later update will add software bokeh combining input from both lenses.

    If you are using one of these devices you have the latest and greatest device in camera photography. The above phones provide the best image quality you can get out of a mobile phone and I would add replace the need for point and shoot cameras.


    I’m just going to say it, Samsung have one of the best looking screens in the market and Galaxy Note 7 was the best, offering a curved 5.7” QHD Super AMOLED display with HDR hitting 1000 nits - it was a beautiful screen to look at. Yes, it was a Super AMOLED display and it made all the colours pop, but if you didn’t like it you could change this in the settings to a different profile.

    From all the devices we have discussed only the Galaxy S7 Edge comes close to the Galaxy Note 7. It was the obvious inspiration for the design choice for Samsung, to take their best selling device design and implement it on the Galaxy Note 7. 

    The display on the Galaxy S7 Edge is a bright colourful 5.5” QHD Super AMOLED display and curves that give it a nice edge (pun intended) over the competition. Some would question the practicality of the Edge, however it allows the form factor to feel smaller than any other device with the same screen size.

    The Google Pixel XL brings with it a 5.5” QHD AMOLED display, which promises to deliver a bright display also, although I’ll reserve my full comments until I’m able to handle one for more than a few days.

    This leaves the iPhone 7 Plus display falling behind if you look at the specs on paper, offering only a 5.5” 1080P IPS LCD display, however you will be surprised by the actual quality of the display when in use. It has a very accurate display reproducing very good accurate colours. They do not pop like the AMOLED based displays do, but are closer to real life colours.  As for the smaller resolution it is very subjective to the person viewing the device, if there is any big difference between the resolutions.


    The Galaxy Note 7 packed one of the best chipsets available in 2016, the Exynos 8890 chipset introduced this year on the Galaxy S7 range, providing great performance for graphics intense applications while also being very battery friendly. If you live in the North America, Samsung in their wisdom went with the Qualcomm SD820 chipset, however performance between the two models is very similar, with some negligible difference on battery and GPU performance.


    With the introduction of the Google Pixel XL, Google decided to go with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821, best described as a factory overclocked Snapdragon 820, so you know it will be snappy. Considering this is the first phone made by Google - where they control hardware and software - the experience of this device makes it a very smooth device indeed, with no lag and great for multitasking, the performance is on par if not better than the Galaxy Note 7. This offers a true Google experience with no additional bloat that Samsung often adds to their devices.


    I’ll be honest - I’m an android user through and through, however I’m not a die hard fan of Android in that I cannot appreciate other devices, even Apple made ones. The iPhone 7 Plus is one of those devices that not only offers hardware but software optimisations that make its performance never leaving you wanting. This the also the first time that Apple has matched specs on paper to other manufacturers, offering a Quad core CPU and 3GB of RAM, not that it ever needed a lot of RAM in the first place. The A10 Fusion chipset really packs a punch, it is fast and the apps are quick to open, when playing games on this device there is rarely any slowdown - actually I’m still yet to see one - because in the iOS ecosystem app developers in general really optimise the apps for these devices. Considering the the Android ecosystem has hundreds of different devices, you can perhaps understand why.



    Battery is one of those subjective topics that is is hard for one user to be able to replicate the performance of another user, this is due to mobile network signal, user usage etc. There are many factors to take into account to be able to provide a benchmark that could be reproduced by every user.

    We know however that the biggest drain of battery of a phone is the screen on time and playing games with the device. Obviously having a bigger battery will help with any device, the previous Note models had removable batteries allowing a user to go from 0 to 100% battery in a matter of seconds just by swapping their battery.

    On the Galaxy Note 5, Samsung introduced a non removable battery and also a smaller battery with only 3000mah - Samsung received a lot of complaints regarding these choices. With the Galaxy Note 7, Samsung took on board the user feedback and increased the battery capacity to 3500mah - still smaller than the Galaxy S7 Edge with its 3600mah - but with their new Exynos chipset allowing the Galaxy Note 7 to have great battery life, people reported SOT of 5+ hours.

    The Galaxy S7 Edge with its 3600mah has one of the best battery performances we have seen in a flagship device this year, generally lasting more than 1 day usage consisting of browsing, watching YouTube, messaging and calls. And thanks to its Qualcomm QC 2.0 feature you are able to charge the phone very quickly indeed.

    We have yet to formulate a conclusion for the Google Pixel battery performance, but from early impressions of this phone, we can report that it’s 3450mah battery delivers above than average battery performance, though we will reserve judgment for our forthcoming review of this device. Don't forget Google touts fast charging with these devices saying 15 minutes of charging will give you 7 hours of usage.

    If you are an Apple user then you know that if you want the best battery life experience, you pick the iPhone Plus, because they use a bigger battery than the normal iPhone. Also having a 1080P display helps with battery consumption with less pixels being pushed by the GPU. With the iPhone 7 Plus the battery performance really doesn’t disappoint. However don’t expect quick charging on this device so if you need a quick top up you are out of luck.


    The build of the Galaxy Note 7 was superb minus the exploding battery (Hey, that is the reason why you are reading this article!), it felt nice in the hand with its glass back, and the design made it feel smaller than most devices of its class.

    If you want the exact same build feeling the Galaxy S7 Edge offers you almost exactly the same experience in the hand and you don’t have to worry about those pesky exploding batteries.

    The Google Pixel form factor and its build quality are great, very reminiscent of the HTC 10 design, enclosed in an anodised aluminium body with Corning Gorilla 4 glass protecting its screen, it definitely feels premium. it is arguably a slightly a bland design choice by Google, the Nexus 6P at least had a unique design.

    Apple iPhone 7 Plus again offers a recycled look, with the only stand out difference from its previous iteration being its dual camera setup. You could say removal of the antenna lines distinguishes it from its previous iterations but it is barely noticeable.

    All the devices except the Google Pixel XL offer water resistance, so if you were to dunk it in the toilet or a pool of water, they would survive, not so for the Google Pixel XL. With this being a standard feature for for every flagship device in 2016 you have to wonder why Google opted not to add this feature to it’s Pixel range.


    As you can see you are able to find great alternatives to the Galaxy Note 7, and it maybe that this is why it feels like Samsung rushed this device to market, allowing for defects to pass through their QA process. However this is great for other manufacturers as they are able to swoop in and offer good alternatives such that you won’t feel that you are missing out by not having the Galaxy Note 7. 

    A few features that neither of our alternative phones offer are a Stylus S Pen and a MicroSD slot. We would question how much use users really get out of a S Pen. However should you feel that this is one of the killer features which you must have in your phone, then look no further than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it has a great 5.7” QHD Super AMOLED display, great battery performance, the chipset can still punch above some of the 2016 release phones and it comes with a stylus. Oh and the screen is flat, I never understood why Samsung chose to combine a curved display with a stylus.Try and sign something on the edge of the display, I dare you!

    As for external storage I feel that with all these device offering various storage solutions, the only negative of this is the cost, which may seem high, but you are getting fast storage and some devices offer a 256GB option.

    We would like to give worthy mention to two other devices, which even though they are not in the same class as the Galaxy Note 7, are still options if you don’t mind sacrificing the latest and greatest hardware there is. They come in at a considerably lower price than the Galaxy Note 7 and the alternatives.

    Before Google introduced the Google Pixel recently, it had the Nexus brand, and the Nexus 6P still has one of the best cameras in the market - it takes amazing pictures and with the HDR+ feature from Google it can really show how capable the camera is.  It also offers a 5.7" QHD AMOLED display, with 32GB and 64GB storage options. This phone can be had for really silly prices right now.

    The other device is the Honor 8 with its dual 12MP camera setup - introduced earlier on their Huawei P9 flagship model - offering a RGB sensor and a monochrome sensor. It comes with a 5.2" 1080P LTPS display, plenty of storage and external storage for almost half the price of a Galaxy Note 7.

    So what phones do you think could fill the Galaxy Note 7 boots? Do you agreed with our choices? Would you change to Apple or have you because of this? Let us know in the comments below.

    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Social

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Извините, я плохо говорю по-английски. Гугл переводчик помогает. Я не могу скачать прошивку, вы можете прислать мне прошивку?
    • Hey!Any fellow motorcycle riders here? I just watched this video about Big Ear filtered custom motorcycle earplugs and I want to know if any of you here tried their products. I'd love to get myself a pair but I want to know if they're great first. Any other recommendation? Thanks! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74-CvPzyW48&t=5s
    • Hello! This is my first post here. Glad to finally join this community.
    • I dabble in pretty much every bit of tech out there, but there are two bits of tech that really interest me and I’ve never yet got involved with. The first is 3D printing (I still haven’t gone there, but I feel the time is coming) and the second is laser engraving and cutting. I’m not sure what the fascination is with the latter for me (maybe it’s the ‘freaking laser!’ factor), I’m not particularly craft or artistic, but I’ve always just thought the ability to engrave artwork onto stuff is fascinating. With this in mind, when I was asked if I wanted to review the Flux beamo, a new Kickstarter project looking to democratise laser engraving and cutting, I just couldn’t say no! Flux? Who? It’s probably worth starting with a few words on Flux themselves. Of course, when backing a Kickstarter project, the first concern is often ‘am I going to see the product I’m backing’? Thankfully, Flux has a solid pedigree in this regard so for once this is a Kickstarter you can enter with confidence. Taiwan based Flux was founded in 2014 with the goal of making 3D printing accessible to all. $1.6m of Kickstarter funding later saw the release of the critically acclaimed Flux Delta, a modular 3D printer that combined laser engraving and drawing. So what is the beamo? The beamo laser cutter and engraver packs a powerful 30W CO2 laser into an impressively small footprint that’s barely bigger than 4 sheets of A4 paper. It weighs in at 22Kg and it’ll fit in nicely with the most compact of homes or offices, not least because of its smart industrial design. Utilising the classic Flux approach, the design blends cutting-edge technology (pun intended) with impressive approachability, quality and functionality. While it might look like a well thought out consumer product, Beamo actually includes features only normally found in industrial-grade laser cutters including closed-loop, maintenance free water-cooling, a 1,000 DPI laser that is smaller than the width of a human hair with 0.05mm layer depth, an optional rotary add-on for engraving curved objects and even an optional diode laser and CO2 laser for improved cutting speed and efficiency. But what’s it like? By far the best way for me to review the beamo is to talk about my experience as a complete engraving / cutting / 3D printing novice. Honestly, it couldn’t have been any more straightforward. The machine comes well packed in a huge box with everything you need to get started included. Take the beamo out of the box, plug in the Wi-Fi adaptor if required, affix the extraction hose to the back with a jubilee clip (it’s just like a tumble dryer hose), plug it into the mains and turn it on. It really is as simple as that to set up. At this point the huge display on the right of the device (which looks to be Raspberry Pi powered by the way!) springs into life and you’ll quickly arrive at a straightforward touchscreen UI for controlling the machine. From here you can configure Wi-Fi details or view the Ethernet connection details, which will provide you with an IP address you’ll use to connect from your PC. On your PC or Mac you’ll need to download the Beam Studio application which connects to the beamo using the IP address displayed on your machine. A standard sample print is included (together with a small piece of wood in the box, a lovely touch!) to let you quickly and easily see the machine in action. It’s rather impressive! The sample project loads up and has a beamo logo set to engrave and a circle around it set to cut. When kicking it off for the first time and seeing the engraving in action, it’s incredibly cool and exciting, but when it cuts – wow, that’s when it really gets taken to the next level. This thing is AWESOME! After trying the demo project, setting up your own is incredibly easy. The Beam Studio app can import all types of files (including bitmaps, not just vectors), it can convert to monochrome or grayscale and it includes a wide range of presets for different types of materials. After starting the job, the display on the machine itself helps you keep track of progress and there’s a handy ‘abort’ option on the touchscreen display should things go awry. The beamo can engrave and cut cardboard, wood, bamboo, leather and acrylic and engrave fabric, rubber, cement (!), glass, stone, anode metal or stainless steel (with the diode laser). I’ve been a bit of a maniac and shoved all sorts of things in the machine from phone cases to Moleskine diaries to wallets and its handled everything with aplomb. It’s so easy to use and fun, you won’t be able to help yourself.  By far my favourite beamo feature is its built in camera. This allows you to take a picture of the bed with your material in place to allow you to perfectly align your image and ensure that things get engraved or cut in the correctly place. The only other action that needs to be completed before kicking off the job is focusing the laser, which is as simple as raising / lowering the laser unit against an acrylic guide (an autofocus mod is available for an additional cost). The reviewers guide for beamo suggested keeping a fire extinguisher nearby was a good idea, which makes sense, but on the whole beamo is designed to be as safe as possible. All fumes are vented out the back by a powerful fan and the machine pauses immediately if the lid is opened.  Should I buy a beamo? The $849 cost of entry for beamo is no small chunk of change, but my word, what a machine you get for your money. You’ll quickly find yourself inundated with requests from friends to engrave things and you’ll find yourself looking at everything in a new way with a ‘does it engrave’ thought in your mind. Flux have done an astonishingly good job of making laser tooling available to everyone and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend adding the beamo to your arsenal. Head on across to Kickstarter to back the campaign! View full item
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.