muude 0 Posted December 17, 2002 · Report post You all say that SD is about 4 x times as fast as MMC, but how does that affect playing videos? Does it lag with the MMC or can you run more fps or doesn't it really matter :?: :?: All I know from you guys is that SD is about 4 x times as fast, but what about videos :?: :?: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muude 0 Posted December 17, 2002 · Report post Could it really be that noone knows?? WOW!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pibrahim 0 Posted December 17, 2002 · Report post I read an article on the net somewhere that seemed to suggest that the difference in speed would be absolutely negligible on the SPV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aal234 0 Posted January 21, 2003 · Report post I use both mmc and sd cards in my pocket PC for video at rates upto 200kbps and there seems to be no real difference between them. So at the lower rates used on SPV there should be no problem at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Monolithix 0 Posted January 21, 2003 · Report post The SPV seems to be unable to write data to SD cards particulary quickly, hence the large delay when saving a picture taken by the camera. I managed to crash my SPV for the first time yesterday when trying to perform a load of other commands while saving a picture. Imho i'd go for SD cards over MMC, as they are more future proof. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
