morpheus2702, on Feb 3 2006, 20:33, said:
It constantly amazes me how much of a positive spin the C600 is given in comparison to the C550 on MoDaCo.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And to add to your valid point mate, it NEVER ceases to amaze me, 'how much of a positive spin the c600 is given in comparison to the SP5 on MoDaCo'.
By that, I mean I hear users signing its praises left, right, centre, down below, up above and anywhere in between on this forum, yet hardly a word spoken (in the same praising way - there is plenty of technical stuff on it though) about the sp5.
And I find that utterly bizzare, as surely if ever there was an argument that was substantive, not opinion based, this has to be it.
You see, I'm not saying the C600 is poor... On the contrary, the strengths of the C600 are the very requirement for my argument about the sp5. My point is that if the sp5 is the same identical phone under the hood that a c600 is, and it still looks good, and the screen is great, and its still not especially big or heavy, BUT it has wi-fi, then why is it not raved about in the same way as a C600 is on here.
If the only 'perceived' down sides to an sp5 compared to a c600 are; it's not QUITE as sexy, its a tiny BIT bigger, and its a tiny BIT heavier, but all the other good things about the c600 apply equally to it, AND it has wi-fi, then why oh why is the sp5 not raved about on here like the c600 is...?
I really just dont get it.
To all you c600 users that rave about their device, let me say this... yup your right - its a GREAT device isn't it. But my sp5 does all that too, is barely larger or heavier, AND it has wi-fi.
So, how come MY device threfore, isn't utterly amazing like your c600 is. What did I miss? Mine is everything your phone is, and even more. The only difference is looks, and yet in the early days of the sp5 people were raving about its sleek, sexy, understated looks...
Oh well... at least "I" think my device is amazing *lol*