Yeah not bad at all. Definitely looking forward to the rest. Cheers Tomchap!
Camera lens cover!
Started by
siksik6
, Jun 25 2008 05:24 PM
#21
Posted 01 July 2008 - 03:31 PM
#22
Posted 02 July 2008 - 01:13 PM
A bit over exposed maybe but this one turned out ok for a HTC camera! 
Attached Files
I still exist
#23
Posted 02 July 2008 - 03:47 PM
WearTheFoxHat, on Jul 1 2008, 15:33, said:
Nice images, although when full size, the quality of the camera still isnt up to par with the likes of SonyEricsson. Even on their 3.2Megapixel one.
agreed, its quite terrible quality - like all HTC cameras alas
SE and NOKIA are leading by some margin on that front
even the iPhone 2meg camera is better. - though some of it could be firmwarefixable?
#24
Posted 02 July 2008 - 04:07 PM
I really do have my fingers crossed that the camera on the Samsung i900 is amazing! I will be the happiest WinMo user EVER!
Orange regrets to inform you that their network will be going down in 1 hours time for all users apart from yourself. This is because nothing would go down on you, not even a network!
#25
Posted 04 July 2008 - 01:01 PM
I have done the with/without back plate test and there is no difference whatsoever on my Diamond. I copied the monitor photo test posted here and both my pictures looks like the one without the back plate on.
I wonder if they have changed the dust cover material already, or the bad pictures are just a result of finger prints on the cover?
I wonder if they have changed the dust cover material already, or the bad pictures are just a result of finger prints on the cover?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







Sign In
Create Account


Back to top










