The competition wasn't based on "who has the most / or sufficient posts"
If the member has NEVER posted, and has only ever viewed this whole site six times in six years, provided he satisfies the requirements that Paul set out - a current or previous Plus Member etc, then he has EVERY right of winning.
All I was pointing out was that with such few views in those six years, he may be a member with a no longer active email adrress etc, and this might not be able to be reached to let him know he has one.
I certainly didn;t want to start a big debate about "I have plenty posts, I should win"
And it's ok, I know you only meant it in jest guys... I just would rather not open a big long list of follow up replies on that subject *lol*
Let's just wait and see :-)