96 replies to this topic

[shokka9]

lupus_hegemonia, on Mar 12 2010, 00:38, said:

I wish that TOO!!!

[lupus_hegemonia]

shokka9, on Mar 12 2010, 12:53, said:

[shokka9]

lupus_hegemonia, on Mar 12 2010, 11:03, said:

(lets see how many emoticons we can reply with)

[lupus_hegemonia]

Forget 'bout it; I PM ya... reply me when you feel better. Regards to you (NOT to your... city! HAHAHA!).

[raaj13]

khaunchai 21928 2nd test(lower then the first tests). The highest one being with xpuscalar set at 472mhz if that works(it sets the speed to 624mhz i think).the lower one being without it.The one being with titanium enabled.The m2d test is a suprise being a bit better then the titanium test.few more test to go through.

Attached Files

•  ScreenShot3.Jpeg   19.95K   15 downloads
•  ScreenShot1.Jpeg   19.96K   9 downloads
•  ScreenShot4.Jpeg   19.94K   8 downloads
•  ScreenShot5.Jpeg   18.21K   4 downloads
•  ScreenShot6.Jpeg   18.41K   5 downloads
•  ScreenShot7.Jpeg   13.21K   7 downloads
•  ScreenShot9.Jpeg   13.79K   4 downloads
•  ScreenShot10.Jpeg   19.95K   7 downloads

Edited by raaj13, 12 March 2010 - 05:17 PM.

[raaj13]

now the testing it with running apps.
titanium enabled.9 programs running(opera mobile 10 beta 3,opera mobile 9.5,zenonia,resco explorer,streaming player,corecodec player,file explorer,ucweb and media album). The fastest being again with xcpuscalar.

Attached Files

•  ScreenShot11.Jpeg   19.21K   8 downloads
•  ScreenShot12.Jpeg   18.02K   8 downloads
•  ScreenShot13.Jpeg   17.63K   5 downloads
•  ScreenShot15.Jpeg   19.19K   6 downloads
•  ScreenShot14.Jpeg   19.18K   8 downloads

[jms2367]

Haven't flashed my phone for quite some time now. decided to try (again) shokka's last wm6.1 rom, SHKvRC lite 20270. Benchmark result is typical wm6.1 Omnia.  around 257.  One of shokka's greatest.  I installed Manila classic and used Shokka.s all black theme (used a different wallpaper though).  a very good wm6.1 rom.  Not as responsive as the more recent wm6.5 roms though but memory usage is much decent using this rom.  I have 52Mb of RAM left with phone dialer and Samsung's today2 UI after a day of use.

Attached Files

•  shkbench.jpg   25.02K   4 downloads
•  shkverlite.jpg   27.2K   8 downloads
•  shkallblack.jpg   25.51K   9 downloads
•  shklauch.jpg   36.79K   5 downloads

[X-pro]

jms2367, on Jun 6 2010, 05:40, said:

Haven't flashed my phone for quite some time now. decided to try (again) shokka's last wm6.1 rom, SHKvRC lite 20270. Benchmark result is typical wm6.1 Omnia.  around 257.  One of shokka's greatest.  I installed Manila classic and used Shokka.s all black theme (used a different wallpaper though).  a very good wm6.1 rom.  Not as responsive as the more recent wm6.5 roms though but memory usage is much decent using this rom.  I have 52Mb of RAM left with phone dialer and Samsung's today2 UI after a day of use.

hehe running the same and why, because it just works By the way I have found no lag in responsiveness. I installed another "driver" for vibration and with spb,sense,Spam alert and s2u2 it still opens sms in 2 sek.

[X-pro]

Sb., on Mar 4 2010, 09:39, said:

I think you maybe need to get the tests from at least 3 different phones, I'm sure that each phone will give different readings judging by the responses in each thread regarding speeds but then again realistically when using how much can you really notice? I flash almost everyone's ROM and most of the time can hardly see any difference in speed for same builds, just depends on whats cooked in like M2D etc. I personally think people are getting too carried away with hopes of using another rom because its 1 millionth of a second quicker than the other. My point is how many seconds faster is one ROM running compared to another doing certain tasks?

fully agree with you. shokka's 6.1 rom might not be as fast when benchmarking it with sk tools, but the basic functions like opening an sms is so much faster and that games, and other programs, doesn't run so fast is for me irrelevant. Gps with xbic1 is ready in 30 sek with 5 to 9 satellites. To me omnia is just a phone and basic functions should work flawless, all other things is just glimmer By the way, wouldn't it be nice to see what shokka could cook for the i900 with all the new thing that have happen since 20270  

[jms2367]

X-pro, on Jun 6 2010, 15:08, said:

hehe running the same and why, because it just works By the way I have found no lag in responsiveness. I installed another "driver" for vibration and with spb,sense,Spam alert and s2u2 it still opens sms in 2 sek.

i agree it just works. what driver did you install to improve on responsiveness? i installed touchresponse. i am still experimenting with some registry tweaks and have achieved a relatively good responsiveness now.  i am comparing the responsiveness in terms of pdhee's com2 roms which are really quite responsive. the responsiveness i achieved now with shokka's rom is comparable with ock's and nick's roms.

i wonder if shokka would just cook one more rom for our omnia's.

[ProfJack]

I think no two omnias are the same. I flashed my omnia many times with different roms from different chefs, but steff195's roms are the most stable for me. I am using his 22022 M2Dv2 rom which happens to be the fastest and the best for me so far. Transcriber is not there so if anyone knows a workaround.....?!?

The only problem I have with you chefs is you remove the transcriber which I prefer so much. I then tried to install different transcriber cabs I have but these roms simply rejects them. I respect Nicks roms because of the transcriber, but his roms drain the battery faster even with the battery fix cab installed.

However, thanks to you chefs. You are doing a great job.

[X-pro]

jms2367, on Jun 6 2010, 09:19, said:

i agree it just works. what driver did you install to improve on responsiveness? i installed touchresponse. i am still experimenting with some registry tweaks and have achieved a relatively good responsiveness now.  i am comparing the responsiveness in terms of pdhee's com2 roms which are really quite responsive. the responsiveness i achieved now with shokka's rom is comparable with ock's and nick's roms.

i wonder if shokka would just cook one more rom for our omnia's.

first I deactivate vibration then I use touchback and after that install I use azharsunny's. It makes it more smooth, but if what you have know works, don't fix it

Attached Files

•  TouchBackv1_0_beta4.cab   37.66K   13 downloads
•  iTouch_azharsunny_ULTRAtouch.cab   1.32K   14 downloads

[jms2367]

X-pro, on Jun 6 2010, 22:41, said:

first I deactivate vibration then I use touchback and after that install I use azharsunny's. It makes it more smooth, but if what you have know works, don't fix it

thanks. i can't make touchback to work hence i went back to touchresponse. maybe because of some startup items i removed. shokka's rom really works and i think the rom is just settling down and i am able to get very good responsiveness and speed now.

cheers.  

[X-pro]

jms2367, on Jun 6 2010, 23:20, said:

thanks. i can't make touchback to work hence i went back to touchresponse. maybe because of some startup items i removed. shokka's rom really works and i think the rom is just settling down and i am able to get very good responsiveness and speed now.

cheers.  

ups sry notafication port 9, forgot to mention

[Compuse]

Nicklashidegard's rom does 308 moves  



Seems most roms are downscaling the 624 to 500mhz or less?

[jms2367]

for a wm6.1 rom, benzo's 21057 lite rom is very impressive. it does 296 moves.  and it is translated in the user experience. it is very fast, stable, and responsive. it is a lite rom but i added many applications already when i did the test. (posted the screen shots also at benzo's thread)

link to rom:  Benzo's 21057 WM lite ROM (WM6.1)

[andrew.mazlim]

Well, boys (and girls!), now after OCK's retirement, we - "we, the magnificent few" (i900ers) - lost ANOTHER good cheff for custom roms to flash our Omnia i900...
Only few around i900's cheffs left, by now.
So..., I think is time for us, to write down a review, for the most BEST/STABLE/FAST/BEAUTIFUL roms of all times, counting these last two years, 2009 & 2010.

What do you think about that?

We may help the "green" users (yap, there are quite some people, actually still buying i900, in these very moments) and we can help ourselves, as well.