21 replies to this topic

[Patrick73]

 IMG_0581.JPG   127.1K   65 downloads  IMG_0580.JPG   2.52MB   93 downloads  IMG_0579.JPG   105.49K   94 downloads

I have tested a few games on it that i have got


GTA 3 works very well on it so far.

Minecraft is smooth too.
I have done neocore and Quadrant standard test and both good for the spec.

Edited by Patrick73, 15 April 2012 - 04:33 PM.

[flibblesan]

Good scores. The Cortex A5 is a fantastic chip and hopefully these results will please people who think the phone won't be much better than the Monte Carlo/Skate  

2072 is pretty nice in Quadrant. Could somebody please run antutu and Linpack and provide those results please?

[toyotahilux]

Deary me, that is a fair jump from the Blade. I know people say Quadrant scores don't mean much, but there must be something meaningful when it's more than double.

[flibblesan]

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

[Davidoff59]

my highest blade score on antutu. was around 1950 on stock sd card at 729 MHz but most Roms are around 1600-1700 so will be interesting to see comparisons

Edited by Davidoff59, 15 April 2012 - 03:21 PM.

[flibblesan]

Davidoff59, on 15 April 2012 - 03:00 PM, said:

my highest score on antutu. was around 1950 on stock sd card at 729 MHz but most Roms are around 1600-1700 so will be interesting to see comparisons

Not bad. I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S. If it's true then that's impressive.

[Davidoff59]

Sorry. those scores were on blade.. Opera playing up so could not edit

[irishpancake]

flibblesan, on 15 April 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

Was that a stagefright thing...

like was it not broken on Froyo....

giving double scores cos when enabled.....

lotta really good Blades out there, I seem to remember!!!1

[Patrick73]

yeah its very good for the price shame about the rear speaker ( i might go on about that a bit ).

And the Shite UI.

I was looking at getting the Nokia 710 for £129 plus top up, but I did like the feel and look of this one. But as I have just under 100 app's for Android, It was better for me to get this lol.



Thinking of doing a youtube video review, but my voice is a bit rough at the min.


Its a twat to open fully up too. and not much inside

[flibblesan]

irishpancake, on 15 April 2012 - 03:50 PM, said:

Was that a stagefright thing...

like was it not broken on Froyo....

giving double scores cos when enabled.....

lotta really good Blades out there, I seem to remember!!!1

Yes it was but they fixed that in the latest versions of Quadrant.

[putbinoot]

flibblesan, on 15 April 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:

This phone has a much better CPU than the Blade. Quadrant can be a little misleading which is why I'd like to see the antutu score.

2985 score for antutu.
Although that does not show up the poor scrolling of web pages which is terrible for some reason  , not a patch on the monte carlo , think it must be a software issue.

Edited by putbinoot, 15 April 2012 - 04:00 PM.

[flibblesan]

Paul O'Brien has run AnTuTu! Score of 2882
 561320107.jpg   133.45K   56 downloads

And Quadrant score is 2105
 561322737.jpg   144.78K   59 downloads

[Andymac1969]

flibblesan, on 15 April 2012 - 03:11 PM, said:

Not bad. I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S. If it's true then that's impressive.

If it helps here is a Quadrant of a Galaxy S 1270, I have just got the new Galaxy S Media 3.6, and this hammers the Galaxy S, hope these help in your comparisons

Attached Files

•  SC20120415-191933.png   38.19K   15 downloads
•  SC20120415-193754.png   29.74K   14 downloads

[JetKun]

Well, bugger. I bought a skate, and this is lovely

[UnbelievablyScrewed]

flibblesan, on 15 April 2012 - 03:11 PM, said:

I saw scores of 2008 reported on Hot UK Deals which puts the phone about the same as the Galaxy S.

So you're saying this is better than the galaxy s? Z

[flibblesan]

UnbelievablyScrewed, on 15 April 2012 - 08:20 PM, said:

So you're saying this is better than the galaxy s? Z

Well it's not as easy as that. Obviously the Galaxy S build quality is far higher and it has a much nicer screen. The benchmark scores just show that the G300 is a pretty decent device and should have some room for improvement.

[UnbelievablyScrewed]

flibblesan, on 15 April 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:

The benchmark scores just show that the G300 is a pretty decent device and should have some room for improvement.

Yup that's what I meant by better . Of course the Galaxy S' build quality would be better. Always find myself wanting to knick the lover's phone

[PaulOBrien]

I'm not sure the Galaxy S build quality is really better than the G300...

P

[Sere83]

Good results but I still think the Mediatek MTK6575 is superior. I found some comparisons...

http://www.technolog...t-MSM7227A.html

Edited by Sere83, 30 April 2012 - 10:58 PM.

[fahim.yaqoob]

Patrick73, on 15 April 2012 - 03:53 PM, said:

yeah its very good for the price shame about the rear speaker ( i might go on about that a bit ).

And the Shite UI.

I was looking at getting the Nokia 710 for £129 plus top up, but I did like the feel and look of this one. But as I have just under 100 app's for Android, It was better for me to get this lol.



Thinking of doing a youtube video review, but my voice is a bit rough at the min.


Its a twat to open fully up too. and not much inside

the speaker is a software problem. an app called spirit will enable the fm transmitter without hedphones enabled to increase sound.