Guest kabirsaini2011 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Lol i installed it and it don't installation to system at all version 1.2.0 ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 v 1.5.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 have you looked in system/app to see if its there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kabirsaini2011 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 have you looked in system/app to see if its there yep its there .. or may be it shifted by accident lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 pm me the link to the application Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 have you see the mount of Permissions that application has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ben1066 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Righto, hello guys. I've been speaking to someone who actually develops the firmware for the device, and he can't tell me any more but he has told me that: 1) The IFWI is the modem firmware for the device 2) The K800 and OSD use the same Intel CPU but a different modem so their IFWI is not compatible 3) Their user builds are labelled similarly to the leak we have, however instead of eng.release it's something like supk_user.release.mfld_pr2.BKB4OUK.devr3.i284 4) They do not use the tool to flash engineering firmware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 (edited) MiHome v1.20 just installed and x-plore does not show it on system/app for me. Also, uninstalled without problem, maybe it is that apk you have. Edited August 3, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Righto, hello guys. I've been speaking to someone who actually develops the firmware for the device, and he can't tell me any more but he has told me that: 1) The IFWI is the modem firmware for the device 2) The K800 and OSD use the same Intel CPU but a different modem so their IFWI is not compatible 3) Their user builds are labelled similarly to the leak we have, however instead of eng.release it's something like supk_user.release.mfld_pr2.BKB4OUK.devr3.i284 4) They do not use the tool to flash engineering firmware so how do thay flash the bootloader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 where has he gone lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ben1066 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 As I said, they can't say any more. It doesn't seem like he touches the bootloader at all, they have engineering devices with the engineering bootloader already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 dam it lol wish thay could tell us how to root it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rickywyatt Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 he cant unstall it untill he disables the one key locker lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kabirsaini2011 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 he cant unstall it untill he disables the one key locker lol lol u r right ...this was totally noobish and foolish :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zodh Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 look.I do not know if this is of interest. http://www.bestfreeblackberryapps.com/root/root-access-intel-az210.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vermat17 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 The page just says "Not Found"...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zodh Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 http://upcomingmobilephones.com/root/root-access-intel-az210.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 (edited) "Root access intel az210 The Intel AZ210 (also marketed as XOLO X900 in India and Orange San Diego in the *Adb/Hard Root – Access to Android Commander *Soft Root- SU *Pre Deodexed the ability to flash custom ROMs onto the phone, and also providing easy root access." But that is all it says, no further info. Edited August 3, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest i am not a hacker Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Android commander requires root to use and there are no links of any form to continue with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vermat17 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 (edited) If root was achieved, could it then be used to flash custom roms etc.? As in even if we didn't have a custom recovery or flashing tool?? Edited August 3, 2012 by vermat17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest i am not a hacker Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Potentially yes, but I think we need the bootloader unlocked which should be easier with root achieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vermat17 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 I've sent another email to Xolo explicitly asking whether they intend to unlock the bootloader or not, as they keep avoiding giving a proper answer to this... If they say no, then we should count that as the final nail in the coffin in terms of getting outside support :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jul655 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Hi, And we can't have root or flash with JTAG ? (http://software.inte...roid-atom-jtag/) In Intel embedded software development Tools, it's said : (http://software.inte...tom-processors/ in 'What's new') Intel® JTAG Debugger – extended Intel® Atom™ platform supportLinux kernel debug, On-Chip trace & SMP run controlRegister access via bitfield editor, translation and descriptor table accessFlash memory toolJTAG probe connectivity the problem is the hardware necessary to do this ... : ( I'm newby, I just wanted to put together an idea already known but not tested and may have forgotten ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vermat17 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Maybe I'm being noobie here, but doesn't flash memory in that context mean storage??? Like as in a usb flash drive?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ben1066 Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 If you want to go to hardware hacks, we can flash the flash directly and overwrite the bootloader easily. The point is, it's not practical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now