Guest newtonmj Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 (edited) Hi everyone, Ever since my first smartphone/PPC I've stuck with the habit of installing all 3rd party apps to the device, as opposed to the storage card. I think I probably did this initially for two reasons - 1) It allows me to change/remove cards and still have functioning programs, and 2) I wondered if there was any speed benefit from running the programs of the device as opposed to the card - I can only assume if there are speed differences then the device must be the quickest location. However, over time I have decided that reason 1 is not really relevent for me given I only have the one card and many of my apps (e.g. TomTom) rely heavily on the given card being in anyway. So, I'm wondering about reason 2 - is it valid? Can anyone categorically confirm that there could be a speed differential between running applications from/on the device as opposed to from the card? I appreciate that with a single-file binary the whole lot is likely loaded into memory so once loaded/running it'd make no difference, however I'm thinking perhaps more of additional/supporting files (libraries etc) that the program may call - would these benefit from being on the device as opposed to the card? Finally, one reason for me raising this question is simply that I have bags of room on my (expandable) storage card however am of course limited on the device. Mathew Edited February 15, 2007 by newtonmj
Guest rhedgehog Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Not a great deal of differece that i have ever noticed, except for programs that load at startup, like today screen plugins. When the phone boots, the card is not accessed until a second or two later when the drivers activate, and so this can slow down the boot times a tad, but other than that, I have never noticed a difference.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now