Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I thing that was the Uk UPDATA.app If it's not I simply have 2 minutes left. Ah ok. I just flash the zip. Now the boot 2minutes left to test it. It'll hopefully work :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I did upload the UK kernel config. Okay then the kernel config is unlikely to be the cause of my smaller kernel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest totiadrenalin Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I did upload the UK kernel config. Booting with FLB mod 1.6a and the MT kernel img 1 minute left. They just call me that they are coming. My band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Ok I've compiled the kernel with the UK config. It should have all of BigBears changes and swap. boot.zip unzip and flash with fastboot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Ok I've compiled the kernel with the UK config. It should have all of BigBears changes and swap. boot.zip unzip and flash with fastboot. Thanks :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Okay then the kernel config is unlikely to be the cause of my smaller kernel. UK kernel has support for nettables etc which the HU kernel lacks. That might cause the size difference. Anyway as FLB is using UK kernel it's best, in my eyes, to use the right config :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest totiadrenalin Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Booting with FLB mod 1.6a and the MT kernel img 1 minute left. They just call me that they are coming. My band. I have to go now. I'll report from my pulse later. Bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eckengucker1 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 thrilling thriller. oh than michael could see this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 UK kernel has support for nettables etc which the HU kernel lacks. That might cause the size difference. Anyway as FLB is using UK kernel it's best, in my eyes, to use the right config B) The I guess I pulled the UK config? You can check what changed hen you click on a commit. Then you'll see that the only thing that changed is the SWAP bit :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Thanks :lol: No problem. Best I can do right now as I don't have enough time to fully test this and get a new FLB released. To be honest also I'd rather wait for the overclocking support to be changed like I suggested B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I have to go now. I'll report from my pulse later. Bye. Okay, thanks :lol: Have fun B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 The I guess I pulled the UK config? You can check what changed hen you click on a commit. Then you'll see that the only thing that changed is the SWAP bit :lol: You pulled the HU config. http://github.com/flibblesan/Pulse-2.6.29/.../master/.config I uploaded the new config, then I enabled swap and pushed a commit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 You pulled the HU config. http://github.com/flibblesan/Pulse-2.6.29/.../master/.config I uploaded the new config, then I enabled swap and pushed a commit. Ohhh okay, my bad, sorry :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thisweb Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 It boots, but its not faster. We'll have to find the right clock to get the most performance out of it. Thats brilliant news, but if its set at 785Mhz why isn't it faster? Can we make it faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Thats brilliant news, but if its set at 785Mhz why isn't it faster? Can we make it faster. RAM, basically. It's the biggest performance bottleneck in the pulse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Okay, my ToDo list for tomorrow: Undervolt the kerneladd minmax governormodify the kernel config and acpuclock to be able to disable clocks higher than 528MHzSet 528MHz as default clock Anything I missed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 RAM, basically. It's the biggest performance bottleneck in the pulse. We could also overclock the RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rem1x Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 RAM, basically. It's the biggest performance bottleneck in the pulse. Can't we just download more RAM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Can't we just download more RAM? +1 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest flip360 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 i`d go with BigBear`s offer :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimJam707 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Can't we just download more RAM? http://www.downloadmoreram.com/ If you guys do visit this website, don't download anything. There probably viruses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thisweb Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 RAM, basically. It's the biggest performance bottleneck in the pulse. Aah but then how will overclock help us. Whats the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 http://www.downloadmoreram.com/ If you guys do visit this website, don't download anything. There probably viruses. Please select the amount of RAM to download: 1GB * 1GB CT12864AA800 Memory * 240-pin DIMM * DDR2 PC2-6400, CL=6 Was: $99.99 Now: FREE Download Now 2GB * 2 GB ( 2 x 1 GB ) * 240-pin DIMM * DDR2 800 MHz ( PC2-6400 ) Was: $149.99 Now: FREE Download Now 4GB * 4 GB ( 2 x 2 GB ) * 240-pin DIMM * DDR2 800 MHz ( PC2-6400 ) Was: $199.99 Now: FREE Download Now Holy s*** I fell off my bed because I LoL'ed that much :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigBearMDC Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Aah but then how will overclock help us. Whats the point? Overclock will help us, we'll just have to find the exact right clock with which the Pulse works best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Simon O Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Okay, my ToDo list for tomorrow:Undervolt the kerneladd minmax governormodify the kernel config and acpuclock to be able to disable clocks higher than 528MHzSet 528MHz as default clockAnything I missed? No that's all good :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now