Guest GesaugeN Posted April 12, 2010 Report Posted April 12, 2010 I've noticed that no one cooks with SPB shell? Why is that? I know that a possible reason could be that it is not free - so what? cook with trial version and users who have bought SPB shell can only register it ;) I know that's a lot of work for something that is not free, but in my opinion, SPB shell is by far more user friendly that manilla or titanium
Guest corpisa Posted April 13, 2010 Report Posted April 13, 2010 (edited) I've noticed that no one cooks with SPB shell? Why is that? I know that a possible reason could be that it is not free - so what? cook with trial version and users who have bought SPB shell can only register it ;) I know that's a lot of work for something that is not free, but in my opinion, SPB shell is by far more user friendly that manilla or titanium they are some spb roms, chef Nicklaus has one that I remember but why go with the trouble of cooking one with spb when there are plenty of Ultra Lite roms to use from a lot of chefs, usually I think people go for UL and install SPB by themselves. slds, Edited April 13, 2010 by corpisa
Guest adhip Posted April 13, 2010 Report Posted April 13, 2010 Gee....I'll be wondering if a chef cook some trial apps into ROM. Cause, if user didn't want to register or buy them then it will waste a lot of ROM space.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now