Jump to content

Why no one cooks roms with SPB shell?


Recommended Posts

Guest GesaugeN
Posted

I've noticed that no one cooks with SPB shell? Why is that?

I know that a possible reason could be that it is not free - so what? cook with trial version and users who have bought SPB shell can only register it ;)

I know that's a lot of work for something that is not free, but in my opinion, SPB shell is by far more user friendly that manilla or titanium

Guest corpisa
Posted (edited)
I've noticed that no one cooks with SPB shell? Why is that?

I know that a possible reason could be that it is not free - so what? cook with trial version and users who have bought SPB shell can only register it ;)

I know that's a lot of work for something that is not free, but in my opinion, SPB shell is by far more user friendly that manilla or titanium

they are some spb roms, chef Nicklaus has one that I remember but why go with the trouble of cooking one with spb when there are plenty of Ultra Lite roms to use from a lot of chefs, usually I think people go for UL and install SPB by themselves.

slds,

Edited by corpisa
Guest adhip
Posted

Gee....I'll be wondering if a chef cook some trial apps into ROM. Cause, if user didn't want to register or buy them then it will waste a lot of ROM space.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.