Guest hungary Posted May 16, 2010 Report Posted May 16, 2010 http://sholes.id.au/how-to/#jit This might work with our 2.1 rom :) Do a Nandroid backup before applying this! Do this only at your own risk. I am not responsible if anything happens.
Guest zerosignull Posted May 16, 2010 Report Posted May 16, 2010 http://sholes.id.au/how-to/#jit This might work with our 2.1 rom :) Do a Nandroid backup before applying this! Do this only at your own risk. I am not responsible if anything happens. Did that in my Vanilla ROM and posted the score ... im well out in front in the pulse section... shame the pulse rebooted momentarily after http://www.greenecomputing.com/apps/linpac...pack-by-device/
Guest Rizzly Posted May 16, 2010 Report Posted May 16, 2010 Well, it's not a very noticable difference, but 1 more MFLOP/s in the benchmark is not half bad :).
Guest Bakes Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 Ok, I just enabled it and got a tiny bit faster than zerosignull. my problem is not that it's not fast, but that it's very unstable. I haven't had any forced shutoffs, but I've had loads of 'program crashed' errors, and when everything is crashing it's really snow. It probably won't be much good until froyo, if we ever get that.
Guest zerosignull Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 Ok, I just enabled it and got a tiny bit faster than zerosignull. my problem is not that it's not fast, but that it's very unstable. I haven't had any forced shutoffs, but I've had loads of 'program crashed' errors, and when everything is crashing it's really snow. It probably won't be much good until froyo, if we ever get that. Think we must have installed different dalvik's. Mine is prity stable with.
Guest Rizzly Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 Think we must have installed different dalvik's. Mine is prity stable with. Same here, not more unstable than my rom already was with a2sd enabled :).
Guest zerosignull Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 Same here, not more unstable than my rom already was with a2sd enabled :). did u post ure linpack score?
Guest Rizzly Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 (edited) did u post ure linpack score? No I didn't, but I avaraged somewhere around 3.4. Somethimes though it went as low as 1.7, pondering if it has something to do with a2sd, or perhaps it just does that from time to time? Edited May 17, 2010 by Rizzly
Guest Bakes Posted May 17, 2010 Report Posted May 17, 2010 No I didn't, but I avaraged somewhere around 3.4. Somethimes though it went as low as 1.7, pondering if it has something to do with a2sd, or perhaps it just does that from time to time? Well, exactly. Sometimes it's pretty fast, but sometimes it's really slow and everything's crashing.
Guest Josh04 Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 I've installed this, system hung a few times when I first booted up, but after that it seemed really stable.
Guest gusthy Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 (edited) Think we must have installed different dalvik's. Mine is prity stable with. Which one did U use? Installed it, stable, but wery slooow, 0.5 linpack MFlops. Looks as if it were not JIT. *edit: once it was 3.2, but most of the time it is 0.5 and 2.0 *edit 2: strangely Zeam did this, removing it runs JIT well and stable Edited May 18, 2010 by gusthy
Guest zerosignull Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 Which one did U use? Installed it, stable, but wery slooow, 0.5 linpack MFlops. Looks as if it were not JIT. *edit: once it was 3.2, but most of the time it is 0.5 and 2.0 *edit 2: strangely Zeam did this, removing it runs JIT well and stable technically i was using the same dalvik that came in the rom. I didn't realise i needed to put the new dalvik into the lib folder. I was only using the other two .ko files
Guest Josh04 Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 On a fresh boot with Linpack, I'm getting 3.65 consistantly.
Guest BigBearMDC Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 On a fresh boot with Linpack, I'm getting 3.65 consistantly. Instead of?
Guest Gyurmaschine Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 Do you recommend to install this stuff? Im on Bobo&Paul's r6.1 with LauncherPro Beta and its quite fast already but i think this can be faster.. :) My linpack score is around 2,4 atm.
Guest gusthy Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 (edited) Do you recommend to install this stuff? Im on Bobo&Paul's r6.1 with LauncherPro Beta and its quite fast already but i think this can be faster.. :) My linpack score is around 2,4 atm. Launchers can cause problems, Zeam made it down to 0.47... @BoBo: instead of around 2.6 Edited May 18, 2010 by gusthy
Guest gusthy Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 Do you recommend to install this stuff? Im on Bobo&Paul's r6.1 with LauncherPro Beta and its quite fast already but i think this can be faster.. :) My linpack score is around 2,4 atm. Yes, absolutely, it is not so complicated and it is worth
Guest Josh04 Posted May 18, 2010 Report Posted May 18, 2010 Instead of? Not a clue, I only installed it because I expected it to break everything and be quickly uninstalled. I'll swap nandroid images later and do some proper benchmarking.
Guest Josh04 Posted May 19, 2010 Report Posted May 19, 2010 Okay, went back and did it properly, ran Linpack after killing all background tasks with TaskPanel. W/out JIT, all scores were around 2.2. With JIT, all scores were around 3.5.
Guest pulser Posted May 19, 2010 Report Posted May 19, 2010 I know it's not really of much difference, but the great Cyanogen told me recently there are 8 good reasons not to use JIT in 2.1. Some of our ROM users use it (Hero), but I personally don't like the instability. Froyo (2.2) should have JIT be default though, so lets hope for 2.2 releases :)
Guest psionandy Posted May 19, 2010 Report Posted May 19, 2010 I know it's not really of much difference, but the great Cyanogen told me recently there are 8 good reasons not to use JIT in 2.1. Some of our ROM users use it (Hero), but I personally don't like the instability. Froyo (2.2) should have JIT be default though, so lets hope for 2.2 releases :) what were the 8 reasons?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now