European 2.1 slower than Taiwan 2.1?

[Guest Richard K. Szabo]

Hey all

I've been running MoDaCo r5 for a couple of days now, and I feel it's slower than the Taiwan release used in r4. Is anyone else experiencing this?

At first I didn't run Autokiller with 2.1 but two days ago I started using it with the preset Strict.

It's basically the responsiveness that's changed. The software and settings I'm using in r5 was used in r4 too so I haven't changed anything besides the OS.

Thanks

Details:

Battery temp. on 29-32C

No A2SD

Mobile network enabled at all times, Wifi/Bluetooth and GPS on request

One widget

4 folders

4 shortcuts

2 pages in use

PS: I did a full wipe etc

Edited July 4, 2010 by Richard K. Szabo

[Guest]

I think r5 runs smoother than r4, but that is probably because I did a full wipe. No problems here!

Edited July 4, 2010 by Guest

[Guest Richard K. Szabo]

Updated my post; I did a full swipe.

I think r5 runs smoother than r4, but that is probably because I did a full wipe. No problems here!

[Guest Dr. dre]

Updated my post; I did a full swipe.

There is no as such difference between the performance of both the ROM's, But I find it to be a little more stable and a little more responsive.

[Guest Andrew Lim]

I flashed r5, and it did feel a little slower than the rooted ChungWa ROM. Could have been my imagination.

But today I gave VillainROM 12 a shot, and I'm pretty sure that VillainROM 12 is noticeably faster.

Edited July 5, 2010 by Andrew Lim

[Guest gangreu]

I think R5 is faster than R4

About Villain, yeap i agree it is faster, but battery life is REALLY short.

With MCR R5 i get almost 16hours of average use

With Villain less than 7 hours.