Neocore Benchmark

[Guest blackmath]

At the same resolution of Nexus One and HTC Desire (i.e. first generation snapdragon phones) this phone seems to do better. Food for thought! What is the gpu in the MSM7227 SoC?

http://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2009...nce-chipset-sup

Edited September 27, 2010 by blackmath

[Guest badboy165]

According to

the desire and nexus get a 26.5 fps...so the san francisco is better in terms of 3d graphics?

sure that can't be right?

[Guest blackmath]

According to

the desire and nexus get a 26.5 fps...so the san francisco is better in terms of 3d graphics?

sure that can't be right?

hence my post :lol:

[Guest mannybianco]

As far as I know both the Snapdragon QSD8250 SoC (Nexus One, Desire, X10 etc) and the MSM7227 SoC packs the same Adreno 200 GPU. The Neocore 3D benchmark was supposedly developed to show off the capabilities of the MSM72xx platform, so I guess the difference in end score could be all down to optimization.

Edited September 27, 2010 by mannybianco

[Guest blackmath]

As far as I know both the Snapdragon QSD8250 SoC (Nexus One, Desire, X10 etc) and the MSM7227 SoC packs the same Adreno 200 GPU. The Neocore 3D benchmark was supposedly developed to show off the capabilities of the MSM72xx platform, so I guess the difference in end score could be all down to optimization.

Cool. :lol: I was hoping it wasn't down to optimisations.

Anyone got Quadrant pro? Need to compare the gpu scores.

[Guest Teasy]

I noticed a NeoCore benchmark on a website on a T-Mobile MyTouch 3G Slide (same Qualcomm MSM7227 Soc as ZTE Blade). It scored 31.2fps, over 9 frames per second slower then the Blade and that's with the benchmark running at a lower res on the Slide.

Looking around on Google that score seems to be the norm, I wonder why the Blade would score higher while rendering more pixels when its using the same CPU/GPU at the same speed? Better ram?

Edited October 9, 2010 by Teasy