San Francisco vs HTC wildfire

[Guest 325i]

I know the SF is a very good phone especially considering the price of it. I can get a HTC wildfire for around £20 more than the SF.

So as the price difference between the two is not much, which phone out of the two would be better? To me, both phones seem very similar other than the SF has a bettr screen and wildfire has a better camera.

[Guest tiggerlator]

I sold my wildfire and got this.

The wildfires screen is waaay too small especially with a resolution of only 320x240. Also the wildfire has 384mb ram and the blade has 512mb ram. Get the blade and save £20.

[Guest GraviticVortex]

Blade forum need serious moderating. This is now 4th SF vs. Wildfire thread:

http://android.modaco.com/content/zte-blad...r-htc-wildfire/

http://android.modaco.com/content/zte-blad...s-htc-wildfire/

http://android.modaco.com/content/zte-blad...de-vs-wildfire/

Bottom line is: Wildfire has better camera and masses of HTC users behind it, in other areas SF beats it

Wilfire screen is specially weak point.

[Guest steviem]

Does the Wildfire have CyanogenMod? I guess that would be a (short term) pro for the HTC handset.

[Guest GraviticVortex]

What advantages does CyanogenMod give (apart from obvious AudioDSP and FLAC support)?

[Guest Mangemongen]

What advantages does CyanogenMod give (apart from obvious AudioDSP and FLAC support)?

ooh, sounds intriguing. I'd like that for the Frisco.

[Guest GraviticVortex]

Yes, those are 2 things i really would like to see on SF too...