Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest tonemgub1
Posted

I have a choice between both phones, which one is better? I know G1 has froyo 2.0, and SF should be getting it soon. If SF had froyo would it outperform G1? Also, I mainly want to use the device for music and videos.

Posted

Sit back and think about what you just asked there.

(spoiler: the SF wins hands down :))

Guest tonemgub1
Posted
Sit back and think about what you just asked there.

(spoiler: the SF wins hands down :))

Lol, I'm a noob at just about everything phones. Please say why!

Posted
Lol, I'm a noob at just about everything phones. Please say why!

RAM:192MB vs 460MB~

CPU: Faster/Newer

Screen: So much nicer then the G1, higher res, sharper, OLED

ROM: More space for apps.

Any thing else?

Guest tonemgub1
Posted
RAM:192MB vs 460MB~

CPU: Faster/Newer

Screen: So much nicer then the G1, higher res, sharper, OLED

ROM: More space for apps.

Any thing else?

Oh wow, thanks :] Guess that answers my question!

Guest Andysan
Posted
Oh wow, thanks :] Guess that answers my question!

Ive just gone from a G1 (1.6 in the UK, 2.x only with Cyanogen mod) to a 'Frisco and theres no contest. Everything is miles better/faster with the exception of the lack of a keyboard which I miss a little.

Guest hillmie87
Posted

I'd go for G1 for the keyboard, but for the specs of SF, i dont mind not having the physical keyboard at all.

SF wins for me, for being a better spec-ed phone at an incredibly cheap price.

Also, once the SF community grow bigger, we'll definitely see a lot of improvements of San Francisco. But u gonna have to wait for a bit though.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.