Benchmarks for San Francisco / ZTE Blade

[Guest Peter H]

I've seen all these folks saying how much faster the Froyo ROMs were and I actually couldn't feel any difference. My beautiful widgets was much slower but that was it. So I went in search of a benchmark and found this one it gave me some numbers (below) but also did a comparison which said my £100 San Fran was faster than a Galaxy S. My numbers are:

Total - 990

CPU - 3403

MEM - 749

I/O - 363

2d - 103

3d - 336

New to android so very happy for someone to tell me a better b'mark for comparisons?

I am using gforums Froyo.

[Guest ArcticFox]

Im using same rom with launcher pro and i get similar results.

[Guest ejhollin]

Using the Modaco r4 custom ROM (So that's 2.1), and using Launcher Pro I get:

Total - 392

CPU - 368

MEM - 774

I/O - 440

2d - 99

3d - 278

Your Total and CPU are way different to mine. If that's the improvement with Froyo, then I can't wait to install a fully-working version

[Guest jimmy2x2x]

I've seen all these folks saying how much faster the Froyo ROMs were and I actually couldn't feel any difference. My beautiful widgets was much slower but that was it. So I went in search of a benchmark and found this one it gave me some numbers (below) but also did a comparison which said my £100 San Fran was faster than a Galaxy S. My numbers are:

Total - 990

CPU - 3403

MEM - 749

I/O - 363

2d - 103

3d - 336

New to android so very happy for someone to tell me a better b'mark for comparisons?

I am using gforums Froyo.

Using Froyo alpha 1 rom, my results are almost exactly the same as yours

I'm not sure how reliable this benchmark is, our CPU benchmark looks suspect to me

[Guest ejhollin]

Hmmmm.. That CPU benchmark in 2.2 does look a little spurious and therefore skews the total. Happy to be proven wrong though. 3d looks about 20% faster in 2.2 anyway, so that's good news.

I/O is lower in 2.2. What does that measure? SD card?

Edited November 9, 2010 by ejhollin

[Guest Peter H]

Using Froyo alpha 1 rom, my results are almost exactly the same as yours

I'm not sure how reliable this benchmark is, our CPU benchmark looks suspect to me

I can't comment on how good a b'mark prog it is or how it gets these scores. Doing a web search it does look like the CPU scores we are getting are huge with these froyo ROMs.

[Guest Peter H]

I have now tried linpack see here and got 7.192 MFLOPS. You can see here how that compares with other devices. Doesn't look bad to me.

[Guest ejhollin]

Okay, using the Modaco r4 custom ROM and Linpack I get 4 Mflops/sec.

That's a big difference (unless I'm doing something wrong). I was expecting them to be similar.

[Guest fishb00n]

froyo uses a JIT compiler and therefore drastically improves performance.

that explains why you have more mflops with a froyo rom, cpu score is much better (maybe too good) and everyone is so keen on getting it :rolleyes:

quadrant says your phone is better than galaxy s, but galaxy s has a some problem with its stock 2.1 rom. there are several lagfixes out there so galaxy s with 2.1 can archieve almost 1900 score in quadrant with 2.1 and with 2.2 its about the same. we have a score of 9xx with 2.2. and maybe a score of >1000 with 2.2 and overclocked kernel :huh: everthing should be smooth then.

Edited November 9, 2010 by fishb00n

[Guest ejhollin]

froyo uses a JIT compiler and therefore drastically improves performance.

that explains why you have more mflops with a froyo rom, cpu score is much better (maybe too good) and everyone is so keen on getting it :rolleyes:

quadrant says your phone is better than galaxy s, but galaxy s has a some problem with its stock 2.1 rom. there are several lagfixes out there so galaxy s with 2.1 can archieve almost 1900 score in quadrant with 2.1 and with 2.2 its about the same. we have a score of 9xx with 2.2. and maybe a score of >1000 with 2.2 and overclocked kernel :huh: everthing should be smooth then.

Yeah, I knew that Froyo was supposed to have better performance, but I didn't realise the difference would be so great, especially when some people said Froyo felt sluggish. I suppose that could be down to the Alpha ROM.

Anyhoo, I too hope we will see a stable 2.2 and an overclocked kernel in the near future :huh: