Guest muluman Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm still trying with other recoveries and settings... If I get it to install I'll let you know :P Thanks man :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matty-p Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm still trying with other recoveries and settings... If I get it to install I'll let you know :P cool btw are are you using the kernel from inside the zip or from deirectly attached to my post ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 cool btw are are you using the kernel from inside the zip or from deirectly attached to my post ?? Inside the zip, are they different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matty-p Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Inside the zip, are they different? yes use the one outside the zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 yes use the one outside the zip Trying it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matty-p Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Trying it now great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Trying it now Same error "Wrong digest: system/lib/libsurfaceflinger.so" tried all 3 kernels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 If I sign the zip with testkey it fails verification with error 0 and if I dont sign the zip we get the wrong digest error. How can we remove it and hopefully get it to boot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'll continue trying to fix this tomorrow :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingQ Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 c'mon guys dont give up , you can do it :P . hopefully you'll finish it within these weeks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matty-p Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'll continue trying to fix this tomorrow :P cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest macrules Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 That phone seems able to do everything :P I've decided that my next device will be one with excellent dev support (Like the Desire or Nexus or HD2) I really want to see how MIUI scales on the blade the JJ R9 rom works like a charm. MIUI is based on CM6, which is being ported by Tom G now. Since Froyo works like a charm on this, MIUI will run smooth. I only miss Flash support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest macrules Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 I had various problems, Status 6, Status 7, Status 0, Status 3, rebuilt the whole stuff a lot of times. Thank you very much for working on this. Would working from the JJ9 build make it easier maybe? If I can do anything to help, please let me know :P. Keep up the good work! We will love you even more if MIUI is running on the Blade :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fonix232 Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Same error "Wrong digest: system/lib/libsurfaceflinger.so" tried all 3 kernels As said, try disabling the signature verification, I haven't deleted the signature certificate, but replaced a lot of libraries (including libsurfaceflinger to have proper screen orientation), that's why you get the wrong digest message (it means, that the checksum of the file does not match the one in the certificate). You can try deleting all FILES inside /META-INF (not any folders, just the three files!!!!!!!!!!!!) and installing after that. Matty thank you, looks like it isn't the kernel, but something else. And, only for this ROM, none else did such. Not compression problems (used DSIXDA's kitchen for packaging), not kernel problem (three different kernel, none worked), but something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fonix232 Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Thank you very much for working on this. Would working from the JJ9 build make it easier maybe? If I can do anything to help, please let me know :P. Keep up the good work! We will love you even more if MIUI is running on the Blade :D It would be harder. MIUI is built upon CM6, so we have to use CM6 libraries and binaries built for Blade, and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 As said, try disabling the signature verification, I haven't deleted the signature certificate, but replaced a lot of libraries (including libsurfaceflinger to have proper screen orientation), that's why you get the wrong digest message (it means, that the checksum of the file does not match the one in the certificate). You can try deleting all FILES inside /META-INF (not any folders, just the three files!!!!!!!!!!!!) and installing after that. Tried disabling signature verification, it results in error 0, Ill delete the files from MERA-INF and see if it installs now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 (edited) Tried disabling signature verification, it results in error 0, Ill delete the files from MERA-INF and see if it installs now Deleted the files from META-INF and signed zip fails verification, unsigned zip says "No signature (625 files)" EDIT: Disabling signature verifications results in error 0 Any other suggestions? Edited February 7, 2011 by Russell Crawford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest muluman Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Deleted the files from META-INF and signed zip fails verification, unsigned zip says "No signature (625 files)" EDIT: Disabling signature verifications results in error 0 Any other suggestions? Would it help at all if you were to replace the libsurfaceflinger.so with one from another rom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Russell Crawford Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Would it help at all if you were to replace the libsurfaceflinger.so with one from another rom? tried it, didn't work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Togo1986 Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 fonix232~Thanks~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest muluman Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Hmm I replaced a couple of files and it recognised the rom as an update zip which wasnt much good. But I think that the file was an update zip sort of rom even before I replaced some files, but im not sure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingQ Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Hmm I replaced a couple of files and it recognised the rom as an update zip which wasnt much good. But I think that the file was an update zip sort of rom even before I replaced some files, but im not sure... So you got it running? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest muluman Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 So you got it running? Sorry no :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matty-p Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Sorry no :P who's kernal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest muluman Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 who's kernal? Whoevers fonix was using, i didnt change the kernel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts