Guest leszekpap Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 guys...i`m now on gsfb23 ....but if new kernel was applied on cm7 then maybe this is good reason to change to cm7 ? what is battery life ? any other bugs ? blade is my daily phone in work so I need to have full stable . thanks for all answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tsddave Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 guys...i`m now on gsfb23 ....but if new kernel was applied on cm7 then maybe this is good reason to change to cm7 ? what is battery life ? any other bugs ? blade is my daily phone in work so I need to have full stable . thanks for all answers. There is a new gsf with the new kernel now gsf 24. Ive installed it and all is very nice. I cant see that CM7 has the same battery life judging by recent replies to this question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shmizan Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Is it just me or is the phone not sleeping in patchset2 ? I can wake it with every button... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Benoe Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Is it just me or is the phone not sleeping in patchset2 ? I can wake it with every button... I have similar experience. No sleep even after 10 mins... Spare parts top3 is: Android System Google services Email In terminal in top, /system/bin/akmd2 seems to be the one with the most cpu time. Usually a reboot used to help with this issue, but now it doesn't solve it Edited September 12, 2011 by Benoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sej7278 Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 I have similar experience. No sleep even after 10 mins... Spare parts top3 is: Android System Google services Email In terminal in top, /system/bin/akmd2 seems to be the one with the most cpu time. Usually a reboot used to help with this issue, but now it doesn't solve it i noticed even with patch1 that akmd2 was using a lot of cpu. i found this from a quick google, not tried it though. my phone didn't sleep last night with patch2 perhaps the wakelock to make proximity work is not turning off after a phonecall ends? it would seem both issues are related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Err... now that you mentioned it... Yeah! Mine awoke with a button press and is showing 100% running (2 and a half hours) in spare parts vs 0.8% screen on. Still stays awake after a reboot. No call made. Edited September 12, 2011 by targetbsp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Benoe Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 i found this from a quick google, not tried it though. my phone didn't sleep last night with patch2 perhaps the wakelock to make proximity work is not turning off after a phonecall ends? it would seem both issues are related. I already tried that workaround meaning /data/delay is already set to 250 in my device. I did that because of the former non-sleeping issues, what I think was related to screen-rotation detection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 I went back to patch set 1 for the sleeping and I have to say one thing that became clear to me, as others noted on the previous page, patchset 2 is properly fast! Going back to 2 and will keep the charger handy until 3 lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ufoman Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 CM7 is again usable for me with the new kernel. I'm sure the device sleep issue will be resolved soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Yeah, TomG has noted the issue now in the code review. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tom G Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 I went back to patch set 1 for the sleeping and I have to say one thing that became clear to me, as others noted on the previous page, patchset 2 is properly fast! Going back to 2 and will keep the charger handy until 3 lol. The only change I can think of that would cause that is changing the default governor to interactive. Patchset 3 may impress even more, I'm about to test it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 I suspect that might well be the case. I've always just used On Demand before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tom G Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 perhaps the wakelock to make proximity work is not turning off after a phonecall ends? it would seem both issues are related. No call needed. All sensors get turned on when android boots (this is a normal part of start up on all devices), so it gets the wake lock at boot and then never releases it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Patchset 3 is up. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sej7278 Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 i'm taking patch1 and patch2 test builds off my server to save bandwidth, i'll make a patch3 build in a mo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Thanks kindly. :) I'd make one myself but I was hampered by the lack of kernel.org in recreating my build environment. :D And I say make one myself. I don't know how you get the as yet unmerged stuff into it. Are there instructions for that anywhere? Or is it just a matter of typing in the git fetch command shown next to download in the codereview? Edited September 12, 2011 by targetbsp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tom G Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Thanks kindly. :) I'd make one myself but I was hampered by the lack of kernel.org in recreating my build environment. :D And I say make one myself. I don't know how you get the as yet unmerged stuff into it. Are there instructions for that anywhere? copy the git command line from the 'download' section of the gerrit page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Thanks! That's easy enough. I'm used to having Windows GUI's with my source code control. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CaptainSpectacular Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Hope the scroling Speed will be more faster in future build, it's the real "bad" point of CM7 for me I think. (except the wavelock bug ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sej7278 Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) The only change I can think of that would cause that is changing the default governor to interactive. Patchset 3 may impress even more, I'm about to test it. so which should we be using these days - the default interactive, not ondemand anymore? what's this smartass2 i keep hearing about? edit: interactive explained here, seems like its more responsive than ondemand. as far as scrolling goes, i've never seen a real issue with it, but patch2 seemed visibly faster than patch1 at that. bit of an overclock helps too oddly enough, cwm5020 and rommanager4407 didn't fail this time! Edited September 12, 2011 by sej7278 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CaptainSpectacular Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Yep, patch 2 is a little bit faster. :) But I think it miss a little bit of smoothness to make the scrolling experience better, IMO off course. Anyway, Sej (and Tom & others devs off course), thanks again for your work, this is what I came back to CM7. :D Edited September 12, 2011 by CaptainSpectacular Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hlubepet Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 Yep, patch 2 is a little bit faster. :) But I think it miss a little bit of smoothness to make the scrolling experience better, IMO off course. Anyway, Sej (and Tom & others devs off course), thanks again for your work, this is what I came back to CM7. :D yeah those people... must have in the middle of the name something like "cannot stop the development". waiting for patch3 :)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sej7278 Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) waiting for patch3 :) go get it: download Edited September 12, 2011 by sej7278 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest targetbsp Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 so which should we be using these days - the default interactive, not ondemand anymore? what's this smartass2 i keep hearing about? edit: interactive explained here, seems like its more responsive than ondemand. Benchmark wise, interactive and smartass perform equal for me and both better than On Demand. I'm not sure which of interactive or smartass is better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hlubepet Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 go get it (see sig) yeah, downloading and flashing..... thanks :) (to everybody who is involved..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now