Guest ermacwins Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 Hi Paul Is this worth looking into? Apparently it speeds up memory cards. Maybe worth putting in future roms? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010807
Guest tmirage Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 I just editted the file mentioned in the XDA thread from 128 to 2048 and 3072 i got 11/18 MB at 128 setting and 15/30 at 3072. The speed increase on the internal memory is very noticable. Pictures load way quicker then before
Guest Korumera Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 (edited) I just editted the file mentioned in the XDA thread from 128 to 2048 and 3072 i got 11/18 MB at 128 setting and 15/30 at 3072. The speed increase on the internal memory is very noticable. Pictures load way quicker then before Ah thought you could change it in CWM but that changed after the last beta :D i'll test it with fix permissions but dont know if that will help. Edited April 3, 2011 by Korumera
Guest Korumera Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 Ok it works like a charm. You cant do it anymore from CWM directly, but if this will be built into the rom directly it would be sweet indeed :D went from 14//20 to 20/40
Guest tmirage Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 (edited) Ok it works like a charm. You cant do it anymore from CWM directly, but if this will be built into the rom directly it would be sweet indeed :D went from 14//20 to 20/40 what value did you put it on? im getting 15/33.5 at most at 3072 Edited April 3, 2011 by tmirage
Guest Korumera Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 I've tested 3072 and 2048, on the moment i'm using 2048, but i think it also depends on what kind of sd card you are using, a class 2 card will never go as fast as a 6 or 10.
Guest tmirage Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 (edited) I've tested 3072 and 2048, on the moment i'm using 2048, but i think it also depends on what kind of sd card you are using, a class 2 card will never go as fast as a 6 or 10. True but i think that SD tools tests the internal storage as it mentions 5.51 gb as total space and i got a 16gb sdcard :D so we all should get about the same performance if nothing in the background is accessing the internal storage. Edited April 3, 2011 by tmirage
Guest Korumera Posted April 3, 2011 Report Posted April 3, 2011 True but i think that SD tools tests the internal storage as it mentions 5.51 gb as total space and i got a 16gb sdcard :D so we all should get about the same performance if nothing in the background is accessing the internal storage. Correct indeed, SD tools gives some information about the SD used. i'll look tommorow and post the info in here B)
Guest Paul Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Looks good, i've implemented this in the next release of my ROM / kernels.
Guest Sorensiim Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Sweet trick :D 2048 seems like the sweet spot for the LG2X - 16,9 & 36,2 B)
Guest sibbor Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Yes, that's what i've implemented. :D PLooking forward to it. Just curious: won't it be much overhead with small files though? And worse performance if performing file operations for multiple small/tiny files at the same time?
Guest crazy_elmo Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Ok it works like a charm. You cant do it anymore from CWM directly, but if this will be built into the rom directly it would be sweet indeed :D went from 14//20 to 20/40 How did you do this ? i'm new to android, so not much experience here.
Guest Xoneso Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Sweet trick :D 2048 seems like the sweet spot for the LG2X - 16,9 & 36,2 B) Interesting as i get the best result with 3072 which gives this result: 14,5 and 78.0
Guest Birthe88 Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 Interesting as i get the best result with 3072 which gives this result: 14,5 and 78.0 Same here, best result with 3072, however i wasnt able to make this permanent. I'm having trouble finding the init.d folder as refered to in the topic.
Guest matlegro Posted April 4, 2011 Report Posted April 4, 2011 You use CWM for apply this patch? Excuse me for my bad english...
Guest wapz Posted April 10, 2011 Report Posted April 10, 2011 Looking forward to it. Just curious: won't it be much overhead with small files though? And worse performance if performing file operations for multiple small/tiny files at the same time? i strongly believe so, and i have undone the changes. installing apps from the market really takes a hit in speed and also recovery with titanium seems to take about 5x as long (yes, really)! best to undo these changes on fr10 with the free app sd increase from the market and set it back to 128.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now