New phone selection

[Guest zenchan]

Like many people here, I got a Pulse towards the end of 2009 on an 18 month contract with t-mobile, then moved over to the San Francisco/Blade as a fantastic Android replacement.

My contract is now up, I'm still quite happy with the San Francisco but I can get the following, amongst others, free:

HTC Wildfire

LG Optimus 1

Samsung Galaxy Ace

Xperia X8

For a little extra (£40) I could also get an LG Optimus Black

Are any of these actually significantly better than the San Francisco, particularly in screen resolution? I'm not interested in games and suchlike so raw power isn't as important to me, the most important thing for my use of the phone is really screen size/quality. I might just get one and eBay it.

Cheers in advance for anyone that has read this far :unsure:

[Guest rbbrslmn]

Like many people here, I got a Pulse towards the end of 2009 on an 18 month contract with t-mobile, then moved over to the San Francisco/Blade as a fantastic Android replacement.

My contract is now up, I'm still quite happy with the San Francisco but I can get the following, amongst others, free:

HTC Wildfire

LG Optimus 1

Samsung Galaxy Ace

Xperia X8

For a little extra (£40) I could also get an LG Optimus Black

Are any of these actually significantly better than the San Francisco, particularly in screen resolution? I'm not interested in games and suchlike so raw power isn't as important to me, the most important thing for my use of the phone is really screen size/quality. I might just get one and eBay it.

Cheers in advance for anyone that has read this far :unsure:

there is no android phone available with better screen resolution than the san francisco

all the phones you have listed have significantly inferior screens and despite their retail price would actually be a downgrade, if you want a better phone you will need to go high end. aside from its awful camera the blade pounds all these phones with its specs.

[Guest k0zmic]

Like many people here, I got a Pulse towards the end of 2009 on an 18 month contract with t-mobile, then moved over to the San Francisco/Blade as a fantastic Android replacement.

My contract is now up, I'm still quite happy with the San Francisco but I can get the following, amongst others, free:

HTC Wildfire

LG Optimus 1

Samsung Galaxy Ace

Xperia X8

For a little extra (£40) I could also get an LG Optimus Black

Are any of these actually significantly better than the San Francisco, particularly in screen resolution? I'm not interested in games and suchlike so raw power isn't as important to me, the most important thing for my use of the phone is really screen size/quality. I might just get one and eBay it.

Cheers in advance for anyone that has read this far :unsure:

Go for the Optimus Black.

[Guest Denzo]

Which is cheaper and which is better, Huawei Ideos x5 with a MSM7230 @800mhz, which is pretty good, just like Desire Z or Optimus BLack's TI OMAP 3630 @ 1ghz. Of course I still trust LG more as it is more reputable than Huawei. Optimus black looks sleek tho.

[Guest HMZX]

Go for the Optimus Black.

that link is for the optimus gt540??

[Guest darkado]

go for the most expensive one. sell that and the blade and buy acer iconia smart (1024x480)

[Guest Mushroom_Lord]

there is no android phone available with better screen resolution than the san francisco

all the phones you have listed have significantly inferior screens and despite their retail price would actually be a downgrade, if you want a better phone you will need to go high end. aside from its awful camera the blade pounds all these phones with its specs.

Well - there are a few 480x854's and the atrix is qhd :unsure:

But no really-blade has a top of the range screen in a low end device :)

[Guest Magnets]

that link is for the optimus gt540??

The affiliate links are auto-generated by modaco forum, based on keywords.

http://skimlinks.com/

OP didn't add any links to his post.