Guest cmberry20 Posted November 16, 2011 Report Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) Firslty, apart from Atomicblue being ver 2.3.5, whats the difference between Bluemonte & Atomicblue? Is one better than the other or is one more stable (less bugs)? Are there any major issues with either of them? I like to use one of these custom ROMs rather than CM7 as I always found CM roms on the Blade a little flakey, one version I tried use to drain the battery like hell! edit: Forgot to ask - does overclocking come as standard with these ROMs like it does on the CM7 ROM? Just looking for a little feedback. Cheers guys. Edited November 16, 2011 by cmberry20
Guest wrtease Posted November 16, 2011 Report Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) i have both and use both backups to choose what i want to use .cm7 is good and bluemonte is a bit more zippier so currently useing bluemonte plus renamed atomic 2.3.5 and no bugs with me yet.i do like to change back and use cm7 for the themes and customisation .but both are okay.my opinion . Edited November 16, 2011 by wrtease
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now