Guest bladebuddy Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 (edited) I own a gen1 u.k bought orange San francisco (amold screen) my son has the same phone in white but TFT screen. We both have chainfire pluss plugins. My son has standard sd card bought with the phone I have Samsung 8gb class 4 they are both overclocked 710 with the same governors. We both are running sweedish snow rls3 and I have apps and dalvic stored on the sd card he has just apps. I am forever cleaning cash etc and my quadrant and antutu are a lot higher then my sons. I do this as I once noticed I got higher scores on quadrant before installing apps. I no that these do not mean much but one other thing I have noticed is on the cave area's of angry birds my sons phone struggles where mine is a lot smoother I have also noticed this on a different game. I also have sd booster installed on my phone don't know if it helps but I see a difference on antutu. Anyway talking today to someone who knows a lot more about phones then I do it should be my phone running slower I do notice games take a fraction longer to load and after reboot hy phone takes longer to load up. I also have a 1350 mh battery instead of the standard 1250 mh so why is my phone performance better could it be sd booster or as amold screens use less power does it manage it better and has anyone else noticed this sorry for the long post but its been puzzling me any help appreciated. Edited March 2, 2012 by bladebuddy
Guest davidloweruk Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 Because screen and sd boster and faster mem card ect
Guest bladebuddy Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 (edited) The post above is crap. What I am trying 2 say is both phones are on a level playing field apart from mine has a lot more internal memory free, has sd booster installed and dalvic moved to the sd card. And at the time of writing that post was running faster not just on benchmark scores but also playing games. That is no longer the case. It seems the longer the rom is installed and apps added the slower benchmark scores are but game play still better on my phone. Have now moved dalvic back to phone and I notice a big improvement on general running sorry for the first post. Edited March 4, 2012 by bladebuddy
Guest flshg Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 I'm no expert on phones, but I think this shows that location of dalvik cache, sdcard cache size and possibly sdcard fragmentation can have significant effect on phone performance. Initially with dalvik on sdcard and assuming large sdcard cache and low fragmentation the performance is higher. More apps might make the sdcard cache less efficient somehow. Moving dalvik back to phone is effectively defragging the dalvik cache, perhaps increasing read efficiency from the cache. I assume that fragmentation occurs, and that the caches are affected by it (presumably they read contigious blocks so fragmentation would cause unnecessary reads). Someone who really knows about this stuff could suggest how best to optimise performance on our phones.
Guest agpoli Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 (edited) Fragmentation is not an issue on flash based data storage (NAND/SDCard/SSD/etc), it only affects HDDs. Just read through an SSD installation guide, all of them suggest to disable Windows defragmenter. For a good reason. @bladebuddy: "...my quadrant and antutu are a lot higher then my sons." Could you share the exact numbers? Edited March 4, 2012 by agpoli
Guest bladebuddy Posted March 4, 2012 Report Posted March 4, 2012 (edited) Thanks for that . My quadrant was 1100+ his was 800 to 900 on antutu my was in the 1700s his 1400 but this was just after reflashing sweedish snow coming back from cold fusion his rom has been sweedish snow for a month or two now. I stupidly I though that the more spare memory which initially led to higher benchmark results was improving game play. But regardless of more internal memory my phone's benchmark still decreased over time with the dalvic and apps on the sd card. I am still puzzled why game play seems to be better on my phone. Probably down to heavy CPU usage apps on his phone . Who knows ? Edited March 4, 2012 by bladebuddy
Guest agpoli Posted March 5, 2012 Report Posted March 5, 2012 Thanks for that . My quadrant was 1100+ his was 800 to 900 on antutu my was in the 1700s his 1400 but this was just after reflashing sweedish snow coming back from cold fusion his rom has been sweedish snow for a month or two now. I stupidly I though that the more spare memory which initially led to higher benchmark results was improving game play. But regardless of more internal memory my phone's benchmark still decreased over time with the dalvic and apps on the sd card. I am still puzzled why game play seems to be better on my phone. Probably down to heavy CPU usage apps on his phone . Who knows ? It's hard to tell anything with just knowing the final score, could you share the detailed results? (CPU, RAM, 2D, 3D, etc.) Running benchmarks within different software configurations could easily result what you experiencing, different scores. Who knows, maybe on your sons Blade some software or syncing runned in the background when benchmarking, and resulted in a lower score. ps: I'm on Swedish Spring RLS4b with burstlams new modded kernel, my CPU is OCed to 672MHz, governor is SmartassV2, SD Card is a 8GB TeamGroup Class10, and I'm getting scores around 1600 points (+/-50 points).
Guest youngsta2010 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Posted March 5, 2012 Does anyone know how someone got 3500 odd on 729Mhz? Fake? People also get 1900 my Max is 1770 @ 729Mhz performance governor.
Guest bladebuddy Posted March 5, 2012 Report Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) Unable to get my sons results as I did not take any screen shots. I expected my sd reads/ writes to be better but the results where to high for it to be just that? The second screen shot is with sssingtracks theme added that's why it looks different. I also noticed in the build prop for sweedish snow rls3/4 that stagefright is added. I know with sweedish spring it was broken and gave false quadrant scores. There does not seem to be the same problem's with YouTube e.t.c so is it working properly now and can these scores be believed and right.! Edited March 5, 2012 by bladebuddy
Guest Maxsas360 Posted March 6, 2012 Report Posted March 6, 2012 Unable to get my sons results as I did not take any screen shots. I expected my sd reads/ writes to be better but the results where to high for it to be just that? The second screen shot is with sssingtracks theme added that's why it looks different. I also noticed in the build prop for sweedish snow rls3/4 that stagefright is added. I know with sweedish spring it was broken and gave false quadrant scores. There does not seem to be the same problem's with YouTube e.t.c so is it working properly now and can these scores be believed and right.! These scores are as true as Justin Bieber's puberty.
Guest flshg Posted March 6, 2012 Report Posted March 6, 2012 These scores are as true as Justin Bieber's puberty. Waaaaaayyyyyy off-topic :o
Guest Maxsas360 Posted March 7, 2012 Report Posted March 7, 2012 Get your point. Thanks Our phone can't be as fast as a 1ghz Armv7 and according to results it's faster. If that would be truth Armv6 would not be trashed.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now