Guest nikufellow Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) Deleted Edited March 31, 2013 by nikufellow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nikufellow Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 I don't understand LG. They are upgrading Gingerbread branch despite of supporting us or upgrading to ICS at least... Ram is the biggest issue - their proprietary optimus crap ui + ics won't fit smoothly in mere 301 mb of dram nor would they ditch their launcher and bloats to give us upgrades, in short - we are on our own. Am happy that at least cm nightlies are available for us and guys like you, stan, gellamar and hectate are trying to make things better (sorry if I missed some one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ajeeshvijayan Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 it will be easy for us if they release v3 kernel source.. i know it won't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 http://pastebin.com/nYNph9YZ Where I'am so far, current bug is with LGE TEST MODE asking what board is this, so wont build so far. but it looks like a complete source for the E430 lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:28:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME> lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c: In function 'CheckHWRev': lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:173: error: implicit declaration of function 'lge_get_board_revno' lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c: In function 'LGF_TestModeAccelCal': lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: 'lge_pcb_rev' undeclared (first use in this function) lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: for each function it appears in.) lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2033: error: expected ';' before 'hw_version' lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2063: error: 'hw_version' undeclared (first use in this function) lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c:2070: error: 'LGE_REV_10' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [/code] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crazybyte Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 (edited) Where is included lg_diag_testmode.h? Do you know the functionality of this functions? Maybe we could remove related files. Edited April 1, 2013 by crazybyte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 Where is included lg_diag_testmode.h? Do you know the functionality of this functions? Maybe we could remove related files. currently comparing lge/factory/lg_diag_testmode.c from the e430 sources to the e400 sources... of course we dont actually need it as CM does without Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StanTRC Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 (edited) http://pastebin.com/nYNph9YZ Where I'am so far, current bug is with LGE TEST MODE asking what board is this, so wont build so far. but it looks like a complete source for the E430 Seems like you should set CONFIG_LGE_BOARD_HEADER_FILE in defconfig. Edited April 2, 2013 by StanTRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 3, 2013 Report Share Posted April 3, 2013 Seems like you should set CONFIG_LGE_BOARD_HEADER_FILE in defconfig. agreed, currently looking at: git clone https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm -b android-msm-mako-3.4-jb-mr1 and https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-p700.git as rmcc has recently added e610 (L5) support to the p700 (L7) kernel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DeathArrow Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 (edited) I've built CM 10.1 and tried to boot it with this kernel but I haven't had any luck so far. Tried different command line parameters for kernel, rebuilding ramdisk, messing with the kernel but still can't boot. Probably the boards differ too much. I don't have jtag or UART board to see why it doesn't boot. as rmcc has recently added e610 (L5) support to the p700 (L7) kernel He just merged e610 source provided by lg with p700 source also provided by lg. I don't understand LG. They are upgrading Gingerbread branch despite of supporting us or upgrading to ICS at least... It's simple, really. At the time of the release of L3, the only difference between L5, L7 and L3 was that L5 and L7 had more ram and a bigger screen at a much higher price. To justify the price difference, L3 has to have an "old" Android version while L5 and L7 has to have a "newer" Android version. Now they release L3 II and the only difference with L3 is that L3 II has more ram. So to show potential buyers that L3 II is "better" and they have to upgrade, LG overclocked the kernel to 1000Mhz and release L3 II with Gingerbread. Edited April 4, 2013 by DeathArrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nikufellow Posted April 13, 2013 Report Share Posted April 13, 2013 We have a booting cm 10.1 with kernel 3.4 now. Needs a hell lot of bug fixing though ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 13, 2013 Report Share Posted April 13, 2013 We have a booting cm 10.1 with kernel 3.4 now. Needs a hell lot of bug fixing though ! I can bug fix till the cows come home, where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest turvat1377 Posted April 13, 2013 Report Share Posted April 13, 2013 here buddy .. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2229798 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest f3tus Posted April 13, 2013 Report Share Posted April 13, 2013 That's CM10 not CM10.1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nikufellow Posted April 14, 2013 Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 but he hasnt pushed the sources to git yet :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 14, 2013 Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 but he hasnt pushed the sources to git yet :( here's the config used for the boot.img for the cm10 build http://pastebin.com/CSukbMUK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 14, 2013 Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 here's the config used for the boot.img for the cm10 build http://pastebin.com/CSukbMUK going to see if it builds from the e430 source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nikufellow Posted April 14, 2013 Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 (edited) well even if it doesnt build atleast we'll know whether any additional changes were made ;) Edited April 14, 2013 by nikufellow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hecatae Posted April 14, 2013 Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 well even if it doesnt build atleast we'll know whether any additional changes were made ;) it builds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now