Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 http://gsmarena-mobile-phones.blogspot.pt/2015/08/55-fhd-zte-v5-pro-zte-n939st-mobile.html http://www.gsmarena.com/vodafone_smart_ultra_6-7313.php not sure if this matters for custom roms for our smart ultra but looks like same phone witn nubia ui ) maybe we can get lucky with this ?
Guest LiNe171 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 I dont know.. On build.prop shows that our CPU its msm8916 or something like that.. And that CPU its msm8939.. Maybe not compatible, i dont know :/
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 gsm arena says our cpu is msm8939 too weird
Guest Andrei221 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 anybody available to test the rom?
Guest Zeus_Alex Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 I'm available to test it out, no problem. but i think the fact that the V5 is a dual-sim and with no nfc, it won't work out of the box. To be honest i would like it to be a x64 build and be fully compatible but that is thinking too high, i think.
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) there is none not even in zte site anyway apart of dual sim look like pretty much same phone to me Edited September 18, 2015 by lunario
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 umm cpu-z says msm8916 too :\
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 http://www.devicespecifications.com/en/comparison/d2ac36834 smart ultra vs blade s6plus again msm8939 soc on both
Guest LiNe171 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 I think its 8916 because our OS is 32 bits.. Not sure of this "theory" xD
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) ok so 8916 has adreno 306 msm8939 has 405 adreno so our is 8939 because we have adreno 405 GPU this weird http://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-410-MSM8916-SoC.111656.0.html http://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-615-MSM8939-SoC.117495.0.html ours is snapdragon 615 8916 is 410 Edited September 18, 2015 by lunario
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) and 8916 is snapdragog 410 ours is 615 Edited September 18, 2015 by lunario double post
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 maybe konstat can enlighten this ;)
Guest Zeus_Alex Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 (edited) I think those "values" are written in build.prop and any app that will try to read the phone specs will just throw those same values. For that we needed some low level hardware check.If i modify build.prop with some other values, i get different information about some hardware. Edited September 18, 2015 by Zeus_Alex
Guest VenâncioFerreira Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 I think its 8916 because our OS is 32 bits.. Not sure of this "theory" xDYou can also have Windows 32Bit in a 64Bit capable hardware.8916 is the Quad Core Snapdragon 410. We have a Octa Core Snapdragon 615, which is the 8939.
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 indeed and soc 8916 is the smart prime 6 maybe our build.prop is from smart prime 6
Guest lunario Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 maybe that is why lonespeaker has problems with cm12 build (build.prop wrong)
Guest LiNe171 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Posted September 18, 2015 Well, he already resolved that. He is fixing (based on his last update on xda) WiFi, sensors etc.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now