• Announcements

    • Reminder - MoDaCo position on illegal content   07/30/15

      ILLEGAL CONTENT I'd like to just reaffirm MoDaCo's position regarding piracy and illegal content in the light of some recent questions / postings. Posts will be censored by myself or my moderation team if the contain or link to: Illegal / pirated / cracked software or sites that host such softwareNintendo emulators / ROMs or sites hosting them (in light of Nintendo's legal stance)CUSTOM ROMS You may discuss and post links to custom device ROMs on MoDaCo, provided the following rules are adhered to: ROMs must not contain any illegal 3rd party software (this includes trial versions included without permission)ROMs must give full credit to the original authorISSUES If you have any issues with this policy, please contact PaulOBrien directly via PM.
    • Reminder: Selling items on the forum directly is not allowed   07/30/15

      Please note that selling items on the forum directly is not allowed by the forum rules. There is a forum for eBay auctions whereby you can list the items on eBay and link to them there. This is the ONLY forum for this type of activity. You may also advertise links to the eBay forum in your signature. Please note that selling directly in contravention of these rules will result in a warning / suspension / ban.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Comparison between different MDA Touch versions

1 post in this topic

Posted

After conducting some benchmarks using the SPB Benchmarking tool with the MDA Touch (128Mb and 256Mb versions) and the Kaiser (v1615 version) I arrived at the results shown in this link.

The most surprising is that in 7 of the 28 tests, the Kaiser came last. Normally in memory or graphic-related tests (Despite the Kaiser having the better Graphics index!).

The 256Mb version was faster than the 128Mb version in 18 tests, relating more to CPU, reading single files or writing multiple files and general real world usability tests.

The 128Mb version out-performed the 256Mb version in 8 tests, more related to the smaller size of storage to search IMHO. The results pretty much match up with my experiences, in that the 256Mb version is faster, more powerful and responsive and appears to have better battery life so far than the 128Mb version.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

MoDaCo is part of the MoDaCo.network, © Paul O'Brien 2002-2015. MoDaCo uses IntelliTxt technology.