You always can find gapps on AOKP project site
[ROM][JB][Android 4.1.2] AOKP BUILD 5 [UPDATED 23.10.2012]
Started by
Kseliozm
, Oct 22 2012 03:18 PM
#21
Posted 24 October 2012 - 03:54 AM
#22
Posted 24 October 2012 - 06:02 AM
google now is not working..!! can u post the link of the gapps?
Edited by sugur, 24 October 2012 - 06:13 AM.
#23
Posted 24 October 2012 - 12:22 PM
yup! Google now is not working! I flashed the same GAPPS on PA build and it dint work der too.... guess it will never work!
#24
Posted 24 October 2012 - 04:52 PM
Fix for com.android.phone FC: http://www9.zippysha...28686/file.html
#25
Posted 24 October 2012 - 05:18 PM
GoogleNow from KonstaKANG gapps is working
#26
Posted 24 October 2012 - 05:23 PM
Link to the newest (23.10) version just died?
#27
Posted 25 October 2012 - 02:20 PM
No, it's working.
#28
Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:11 AM
So far fastest CM 10 based rom 
But i got some errors and process not responding ;X
But i got some errors and process not responding ;X
Edited by Demon Hunter, 26 October 2012 - 11:11 AM.

#29
Posted 26 October 2012 - 01:06 PM
Logcat ?
#30
Posted 26 October 2012 - 01:23 PM
Attached Files
Edited by Demon Hunter, 26 October 2012 - 01:24 PM.

#31
Posted 27 October 2012 - 10:43 AM
Hi I still check this site all time mainly now to read news im not using blade anymore but these blade forums havesome of the most talented and helpful devs ever but equally some of the most rude disrespectful users one could ever imagine no names but IE hackers 1st comment on page one your mum really would be proud
#32
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:33 PM
Automatic brightness is not working, it doesn't remember the preference.
Besides that, this ROM is flying.
Also I would recommend to set the background process limit to "no background processes", made a significant boost for me in battery life and performance.
Besides that, this ROM is flying.
Also I would recommend to set the background process limit to "no background processes", made a significant boost for me in battery life and performance.
#33
Posted 29 October 2012 - 03:20 PM
I have tested almost all ICS and JB roms. I was not able to settle with any ICS roms as S2E didn't support moving App data to SD. Which infact is supported at api level in JB. I have tried KonstaT & Burstlam roms. I never liked KonstaT as he only concentrates on reducing rom size rather anything else. I liked Burstlam roms but it seems that he has abandoned development for AOKP. Now I am your fan. Your ROM is super smooth and has lot of customization option. Great job done. Developers like you keep our blades running with pride. Ignore what KonstaT says. He is little concerned that he will lose out to competition. Andriod is open. Lets keep it that way.
#34
Posted 29 October 2012 - 03:45 PM
I get it you got no idea why those guys are coding, do you? So please stop writing about things and incentives you know nothing about.
#35
Posted 29 October 2012 - 04:03 PM
#36
Posted 29 October 2012 - 04:37 PM
I'm sorry you really don't understand what has happened. This ROM uses konstats as a base so you are speaking rubbish.
If you like my work or if I helped, click the Plus button.
#37
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:50 PM
neothegod, on 29 October 2012 - 03:20 PM, said:
I have tested almost all ICS and JB roms. I was not able to settle with any ICS roms as S2E didn't support moving App data to SD. Which infact is supported at api level in JB. I have tried KonstaT & Burstlam roms. I never liked KonstaT as he only concentrates on reducing rom size rather anything else. I liked Burstlam roms but it seems that he has abandoned development for AOKP. Now I am your fan. Your ROM is super smooth and has lot of customization option. Great job done. Developers like you keep our blades running with pride. Ignore what KonstaT says. He is little concerned that he will lose out to competition. Andriod is open. Lets keep it that way.
I was just saying that the topic title/first post are very misleading to say the least. Someone still might think that this is an actual AOKP build (and I guess you'd need to know what AOKP is to understand
And what comes to Android being open, both my CM9/10 builds are fully open source (you see any sources here?). One of the reasons for that is that it opens the possibility for other ROMs being ported to Blade (e.g. we've now got a great JB Paranoid Android). Feel free to use the device tree in my github if you want to build AOKP for Blade (properly, like it should be done).
ZTE Blade:
CyanogenMod 10.1 - KonstaKANG (Android 4.2.2) - ClockWorkMod 6.0.2.7
CyanogenMod 10 - KonstaKANG (Android 4.1.2)
CyanogenMod 9 - KonstaKANG (Android 4.0.4)
Swedish Snow RLS7 (Android 2.3.5)
ZTE Blade III:
CyanogenMod 10.1 - KonstaKANG (Android 4.2.2) - ClockWorkMod 6.0.3.2
CyanogenMod 10 - KonstaKANG (Android 4.1.2)
Aurora Borealis RLS1 (Android 4.0.4)
Firefox OS - Ubuntu Touch
#38
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:50 PM
neothegod, on 29 October 2012 - 03:20 PM, said:
I have tested almost all ICS and JB roms. I was not able to settle with any ICS roms as S2E didn't support moving App data to SD. Which infact is supported at api level in JB. I have tried KonstaT & Burstlam roms. I never liked KonstaT as he only concentrates on reducing rom size rather anything else. I liked Burstlam roms but it seems that he has abandoned development for AOKP. Now I am your fan. Your ROM is super smooth and has lot of customization option. Great job done. Developers like you keep our blades running with pride. Ignore what KonstaT says. He is little concerned that he will lose out to competition. Andriod is open. Lets keep it that way.
1. You have no idea what this is, do you? The OP didn't even compile this ROM, it's KonstaT's CM10 with ported AOKP code injected.
2. You have no idea what "Android is open" means, do you? If you had you'd be praising KonstaT for his contributions and openness while hounding the OP and Burstlam for sources.
In short, not one thing you said makes any sense and you should quit while you're behind.
Current stuff of mine:
CWM-6.0.1.1 Touch Stable
CWM-6.0.1.5 Touch Testing
Multiboot via loop, no partitioning needed
CWM-6.0.1.1 Touch Stable
CWM-6.0.1.5 Touch Testing
Multiboot via loop, no partitioning needed
#39
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:14 PM
KonstaT, on 29 October 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:
I was just saying that the topic title/first post are very misleading to say the least. Someone still might think that this is an actual AOKP build (and I guess you'd need to know what AOKP is to understand
) when in fact this is my CyanogenMod 10 build with AOKP framework/apps just slapped on top of it. And it's always another story when someone first takes my work and then says I've done a bad job with it.
And what comes to Android being open, both my CM9/10 builds are fully open source (you see any sources here?). One of the reasons for that is that it opens the possibility for other ROMs being ported to Blade (e.g. we've now got a great JB Paranoid Android). Feel free to use the device tree in my github if you want to build AOKP for Blade (properly, like it should be done).
And what comes to Android being open, both my CM9/10 builds are fully open source (you see any sources here?). One of the reasons for that is that it opens the possibility for other ROMs being ported to Blade (e.g. we've now got a great JB Paranoid Android). Feel free to use the device tree in my github if you want to build AOKP for Blade (properly, like it should be done).
This is easy to resolve KonstaT, next update put AOKP in your room, all here stay happy. I have your Room 4.1.2 KonstaT, in future we expect something with this too. Anyway good job what you do. Congratulation.
#40
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:32 PM
Ok. i thought KonstaT was not happy with his work been stolen. Atleast, that's how it sounded to begin with. I think instead of correcting other people and wasting time, why don't you guys try to write the libs to make hardware decoding work for blades or atleast resolve issues with ICS first before moving on to JB. ICS roms are useless if you can't move App Data to SD using S2E.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







Sign In
Create Account


Back to top











