Guest kyrkesmith Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 I think he's replying by editing the posts containing the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Paul [MVP] Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Indeed I am, apologies for any confusion. The replies appear... ...like this. Saves cluttering up the thread :D P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gorskar Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 I would Love the MPX - its small enough to abandon the smartphone platform and run proper PPC apps. However its going to be expensive - Almost certainly too expensive for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest siu99spj Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Well, I'm just gonna stay waiting for the MPx220. From what I've seen and heard it should be perfect for me, so long as it doesn't come out at some of the price esitimates which have been floating around. I very much doubt Orange will treat me to a discount even if I have been waiting as long as I have (Since BEFORE Xmas!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest egghead101 Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Hi Paul, Can you tell me what phone has the bext battery life, Multiple Email Checking and Bluetooth capability in your opinoin? thanks It's hard to say, as I haven't extensively used all the phones, and the software builds are not finalised. E-Mail Checking is likely to be the same on all, as they are all Second Edition, and I know that Orange have been doing work with HTC on vastly improved BT support in the C500, but other than that, it's too early to say... ditto for battery life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aux Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Dear Paul, Did you get any change to ask about the MPX100? Regards, Aux Yes, 'no announcements to make about devices that are not on this stand'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest blewer Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 ATM there doesn't seem to be any competition to what my next phone will be.....MPX Same here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pagemakers Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 The MPX100 (my favorite) appears to have died a silent death of late. Paul can you not even tweak a little bit of info out of them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pigo Posted July 2, 2004 Report Share Posted July 2, 2004 I think the MPX is pretty big... but the 220 is bigger than 200, so I'm a bit indecisive at the moment! 200 = out-dated 220 = to big MPx = expensive (hope not, but afraid it is) C500 = sounds good but it's not clamshell haven't gotten around to checking out the Sagem... gonna go see now actually. keep on getting the information out. helps me decide what my new phone should be. thanks a lot guys Pigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pigo Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 OK I've decided ONE thing. it HAS TO BE flatter than my MPx200 and not a lot bigger either. don't care about weight or width of the phone. just not too long and not to thick!!! I hate the bulge in my pants when I've got it in my pocket (no not that bulge you pervert!!!!). Sagem's not bad by the way. just can't seem to find measurements of it anywhere. Pigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Paul [MVP] Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 I was alarmed to see the MPx220 screen is physically smaller than that of the E200... P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kyrkesmith Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Really? Is it smaller than MPx200's then too? Same resolution I trust? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeta101 Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 hmm, the resolution HAS to be the same, its a requirement of the OS, so this must mean the pixels on the 220 must be smaller (but there is still the same number of them?). Wouldnt this make things on the screen look better (cos of the smaller pixels?) ofcourse it depends on how much smaller the screen is, and it cant be too much im guessing. Anyway strange, i always though screen size as well as res were fixed by MS rule. Can you give a rouch estimate of how smaller the screen is paul? a few mm or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kyrkesmith Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 The resolution HAS to be the same, its a requirement of the OS Is it though, if the MPx220's running 2003 SE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pagemakers Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 I thought the screen was was a requirement of the os too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brody Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Nope, just the resolution. We are now allowed 176*220 pre-WM2003SE and 240 x 320 in SE :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest morpheus2702 Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 But there is nothing to dictate the actual size of the pixels, is there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brody Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jmrecanize Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Ill the mpx220 be accompanied with a mini SD like previous spv's. If so what will be the storage capacity of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest midnight Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Microsoft announced recently that they have allowed manufacturers more scope on the screen sizes to drive down the size of the devices. There are several options (I did have a list of sizes somewhere, seem to have lost it though), but the resolution will remain 176x 220 or 240 x 320 (there is no landscape mode for MS Smartphone, only PocketPC). So, seems strange that Moto should use a smaller display, yet, create a bigger device, no doubt this will make the device 'appear' even bigger. yet HTC are still using the same size screen as the E200 and come up with a tiny device. And from what i hear, the C500 display is vastly superior to the MPx220 display, but of course that may change for the final release version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brody Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 If it does change then someone will be in trouble! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest midnight Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Brody, i mean Moto may improve the quality of their display :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brody Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 OK! I read it as the HTC device reverting to a worse display! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Monolithix [MVP] Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 But there is nothing to dictate the actual size of the pixels, is there? As far as i understand it, in theory there is. All Smartphone's should have the same dpi regardless. It's about 96dpi if i remember correctly. Brody: they told us about this at the msdn event a few weeks back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brody Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 I hold my hands up on that one, good point. They also told us of the DPI on the new screen res so what I don't understand is how the MPx220's screen is physically smaller than that of all other Smartphones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts