Guest corwest Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Is there still the typing and double tap issue noted in the new roms? This is the whole reason im not switching to the new ones. Would love to see it fixed.
Guest Lancez Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Is there still the typing and double tap issue noted in the new roms? This is the whole reason im not switching to the new ones. Would love to see it fixed. 21851 is fine
Guest amahfouz Posted September 6, 2009 Report Posted September 6, 2009 Is there still the typing and double tap issue noted in the new roms? This is the whole reason im not switching to the new ones. Would love to see it fixed. 21851 works as it should and quite fast too, having a problem with igo but other from that all is good
Guest SSteve_C Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Ok I tried flashing 21851 and after downloading the image it stuck with the message 'waiting for reboot' for a couple minutes, so I manually soft reset the omnia and now my pc won't recognize omnia while connected to the USB. If 'NOT' connected to the USB the omnia turns on fine, and activesync works thereafter. And if I turn on the omnia while connected to the USB, the screen gets stuck at SAMSUNG OMNIA screen. So the bottom line is my phone didn't break, but while connected to the USB the phone gets stuck at SAMSUNG OMNIA screen and the pc doesn't recognize the phone. So I guess I won't be able to flash anymore. Does anyone have any ideas??
Guest Tormios Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 i meant the internal 16gb storage, might be a windows 7-vmware-windows xp fluke OK. Understand. It's weird.
Guest Tormios Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Ok I tried flashing 21851 and after downloading the image it stuck with the message 'waiting for reboot' for a couple minutes, so I manually soft reset the omnia and now my pc won't recognize omnia while connected to the USB. If 'NOT' connected to the USB the omnia turns on fine, and activesync works thereafter. And if I turn on the omnia while connected to the USB, the screen gets stuck at SAMSUNG OMNIA screen. So the bottom line is my phone didn't break, but while connected to the USB the phone gets stuck at SAMSUNG OMNIA screen and the pc doesn't recognize the phone. So I guess I won't be able to flash anymore. Does anyone have any ideas?? Try to hard reset it couple of times. May be it will help.
Guest wishyou Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Kob Khun Ka , Master K.C. for rom I will load and test. ^___^
Guest vlodek Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 I don't understand something about the ROM 21851 . It is COM2 . Where already we have COM3 with the 23XXX series and COM4 with the 234XX . So why go back to COM2 ?
Guest stradigm Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 I have been trying 21851 with BT-audio fix (6 September 2009) since last night. 21851 is definitely better than 23409, 23004, 23041, 23034 in terms of stability, speed, touch response and memory management. 21851 does not have new finger friendly big menu interface. You can not freely change the items in start menu but you can send any item to the top of menu. Although it needs at least a few days test to say the exact result, I feel that the memory leak problem that exists in all WM 6.5 ROMs seems to be fixed. I think this will be a reference ROM so that other ROMs will be compared to this one.
Guest gianton Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 I don't understand something about the ROM 21851 . It is COM2 . Where already we have COM3 with the 23XXX series and COM4 with the 234XX . So why go back to COM2 ? Could you please explain what is COM2 and what are the advantages to a higher COM#?
Guest mario.omnia Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 can't wait to get home and flash my Omnia... the faster and more stable the better...
Guest vlodek Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 (edited) Could you please explain what is COM2 and what are the advantages to a higher COM#? As I understand these are versions of WM6.5 when starting from COM1 and now developing the COM4 (maybe 6.5.1) while the final goal is WM7: 21700: version development 6.5.0.1, 6.5.0.20 a 6.5.0.40; line COM1 21800: version development 6.5.0.50; line COM2 23000: version development 6.5.0.60; line COM3 Edited September 7, 2009 by vlodek
Guest Lunchbox77 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 does igo work with 23409, or does this COM crap affect it?
Guest leap_ahead Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 As I understand these are versions of WM6.5 when starting from COM1 and now developing the COM4 (maybe 6.5.1) while the final goal is WM7: 21700: version development 6.5.0.1, 6.5.0.20 a 6.5.0.40; line COM1 21800: version development 6.5.0.50; line COM2 23000: version development 6.5.0.60; line COM3 23041=com3 was experimental ui stuff, now merged with com4 23409=com4 newest builds now include new ui elements 21851=com2 6.5 builds without new ui, this is a specific manufactures branch iirc
Guest gianton Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 After 24h with 21851, I find it to be the best so far in speedness, stability and screen sensisitivity. I also think that this build will be the reference for all future wm6.5 builds.
Guest leap_ahead Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 (edited) but not look nice: Edited September 7, 2009 by leap_ahead
Guest Tormios Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 May be it is not nice but stability is more important I think After all this positive feedback's on 21851 will flash my phone with it. Thanks for the feedback's
Guest dannych99 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Both Build are nice! All have quick GPS fix 23409 has handy UI but less touch response 21851 has standard UI but good third party software compatibility. Hard choice, ha! :)
Guest cyw Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Both Build are nice! All have quick GPS fix 23409 has handy UI but less touch response 21851 has standard UI but good third party software compatibility. Hard choice, ha! :) i would say 21851 would be a better choice. let MS fix the 234XX builds first.
Guest teddyking Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 i would say 21851 would be a better choice. let MS fix the 234XX builds first. +1 for 21851 Very fast and stable on my i900 too.
Guest vince1970 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Hi, I have "Khuanchai_UL_M2D_23016-21928_PP6" installed at the moment. All works well for me, including TomTom. Could some one please explain what is the different between 21851 and 23016-21928 UI and stability of these 2 great ROMs from Master K ??
Guest tingchung_chin Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 hmm... had been in this 21851 for a day, no hang like usual, stable, yes! but there is 2 times when receive call, there is no sound, weird, but for some other calls, the ringtone works, weird weird weird :) :) :)
Guest adithia Posted September 7, 2009 Report Posted September 7, 2009 Very Good ROM,...... I love it.... Thank Mr KC
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now